Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The dude was complaining about using it as a firetruck.......... not it's intended use and plopping a magnet light from Galls on top doesn't a firetruck make......so take your wooohooo "18" to the last year's model forum and stir your pot there. 

Posted

The ignorance and arrogance is strong in this forum.  Who in their right mind would buy anything from Galls?  Apparently it’s assumed that a volunteer fire Department is automatically a bunch of yahoos.  Maybe where you live, but that is not the rule.

 

The vehicles were completely upfitted by a professional installer.  I don’t see what they have to do with GMs extended idle feature, so you are still making a fool of yourself while desperately trying to make an ass out of me.

Posted

Regular vehicles are routinely purchased and used as fire apparatus.  It’s not something new.  These Sierras were built for use as Chief vehicles.  Not some $600,000 engine or rescue.  It seems like you’re such a die hard fan girl of GM that you refuse to see any wrong that they could do.  Personally, I’ve only owned GM products for the past decade.  I used to only buy Dodge before that.  I’ve never had an issue with my Chevys.  This is legitimately the first issue I’ve ever had with a GM product and their response to a concern from their customers is appalling. There are police departments that use these vehicles for their K-9 units.  I guess those agencies use a Galls light on the roof, too.

  • Like 1
Posted
The dude was complaining about using it as a firetruck.......... not it's intended use and plopping a magnet light from Galls on top doesn't a firetruck make......so take your wooohooo "18" to the last year's model forum and stir your pot there. 

 

Lol, nothing going on other than transmission or cylinder deactivation talk in the 18’s, but wow, nothing like what’s going on with the 19’s, the EPA has really got their grasp on the 19’s.

 

 

 

 

Sent from Above

 

Posted

Keep going guys, we’re all learning more and more about the 19’s and up.


Sent from Above

Posted
On 10/9/2019 at 10:28 AM, DeputyHoneybadger said:

Some back-story for you all:

I am a Deputy Chief of a volunteer fire department.  We recently purchased two 2019 GMC Sierras for our chiefs to use instead of beating the bolts off of our personal vehicles.  They were purchased through a state purchase program that significantly reduced the costs of them.  From the very beginning, it was known these would be used as emergency vehicles, which inherently must be left idling for extended periods to power equipment.  After we took delivery of the vehicles, we were on scene of an incident on a very busy and dangerous stretch of interstate highway.  After a while it was noticed that the Sierra had shut off.  Did some looking and found this lovely excuse of a safety feature.  This feature is not conducive to emergency vehicle usage.  At all.  It puts our lives in danger when the vehicle we are using to provide protection at a scene suddenly shuts off and kills the emergency warning lights.  Took it to a dealer and they were unable to manipulate the computer.  Called GM "Customer Service" and they started looking into it.  Meanwhile, we did find that putting the vehicle in neutral with the parking brake on does bypass the shutdown.  We haven't tested for a length of time, simply because idling it just to test this is a waste of fuel.  Also, having an emergency vehicle stationary, idling, in neutral with the parking brake on is not something that will hold up in court should the vehicle start to roll and then injure someone.

 

So I just got off the phone with GM's "Customer Service" after a few weeks of back and forth phone calls.  They stated that GM will NOT do anything to adjust the computer programming, that they CAN'T alter the programming for safety reasons, and that they will NOT work with us to replace these vehicles that were sold to us without disclosing this feature.  Needless to say, neither our department nor the surrounding departments in the area will be purchasing GMC's in the future.

I wonder if GM will offer the police package on the next gen Tahoe/Yukon and, if they do, if they'll shut themselves off. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

I wonder if GM will offer the police package on the next gen Tahoe/Yukon and, if they do, if they'll shut themselves off. 

I would hope they don’t include that.  They made mention that all vehicles would be push button ignition after next year and would therefore have this feature.  I’d be curious if they’ll keep the keyed ignition for the SSV packages.

Posted
8 hours ago, DeputyHoneybadger said:

The ignorance and arrogance is strong in this forum.  Who in their right mind would buy anything from Galls?  Apparently it’s assumed that a volunteer fire Department is automatically a bunch of yahoos.  Maybe where you live, but that is not the rule.

 

The vehicles were completely upfitted by a professional installer.  I don’t see what they have to do with GMs extended idle feature, so you are still making a fool of yourself while desperately trying to make an ass out of me.

Definitely not going for you looking bad - I apologize if that is the way it came across. 

Posted (edited)
On 1/23/2019 at 11:47 AM, Daverado said:

lol everyone just ignores the part about sleeping in it overnight when you need the heater on

That's because many of the fools on this forum have no idea what hard work on a 24-hour jobsite or multi-hour emergency site is and what all those trucks really have to be used for.  And obviously, GM management increasingly has no clue, either.  If a few snowflake tools want to kill themselves by running their Denalis in their garages with the door down, because their Starbucks foo-foo coffee drink wasn't made correctly that morning or Hunter Biden is being picked on or some other 'critical' issue like that, let them.  You can't fix stupid.  And it thins out the idiot herd that the rest of us have to deal with.  But make our damned trucks work like we need them to, 24/7/365.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

That's because many of the fools on this forum have no idea what hard work on a 24-hour jobsite or multi-hour emergency site is and what all those trucks really have to be used for.  And obviously, GM management increasingly has no clue, either.  If a few snowflake tools want to kill themselves by running their Denalis in their garages with the door down, because their Starbucks foo-foo coffee drink wasn't made correctly that morning or Hunter Biden is being picked on or some other 'critical' issue like that, let them.  You can't fix stupid.  And it thins out the idiot herd that the rest of us have to deal with.  But make our damned trucks work like we need them to, 24/7/365.  

Ok Top Gun.....Foo Foo and class warfare......making disparaging comments about a trim level of someone's truck.....class act there ace!   Bought cha a drink ?

giphy-2.gif

Edited by mwbutcher
Posted
On 10/10/2019 at 3:27 PM, MaverickZ71 said:

That's because many of the fools on this forum have no idea what hard work on a 24-hour jobsite or multi-hour emergency site is and what all those trucks really have to be used for.  And obviously, GM management increasingly has no clue, either.  If a few snowflake tools want to kill themselves by running their Denalis in their garages with the door down, because their Starbucks foo-foo coffee drink wasn't made correctly that morning or Hunter Biden is being picked on or some other 'critical' issue like that, let them.  You can't fix stupid.  And it thins out the idiot herd that the rest of us have to deal with.  But make our damned trucks work like we need them to, 24/7/365.  

Excellent post!!!  Well stated.  I started this thread after freezing my nuts off sleeping at a job site.  I laid down and it was nice and toasty only to be wake with icicles hanging off my nostrils and the engine stopped.  My first reaction was WTF!?!?

 

Too many people don't realize there are MEN working jobs that run 24/7/365 like oil and gas drilling rigs.  We never shut down.

 

I will proudly mention I've never been inside a Starbucks and have never imbibed in any of their product(s) or spent a single penny with that despicable company.  I know, I digress...

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, rikhek said:

Excellent post!!!  Well stated.  I started this thread after freezing my nuts off sleeping at a job site.  I laid down and it was nice and toasty only to be wake with icicles hanging off my nostrils and the engine stopped.  My first reaction was WTF!?!?

 

Too many people don't realize there are MEN working jobs that run 24/7/365 like oil and gas drilling rigs.  We never shut down.

 

I will proudly mention I've never been inside a Starbucks and have never imbibed in any of their product(s) or spent a single penny with that despicable company.  I know, I digress...

Thanks.  Yeah, 4th generation oilfield and trucking family here.  

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Yes my Denali does the same thing cuts off while I am setting in it after 30 minutes. Got to be a way to override this problem. Any help is appreciated 

Posted

This is the worst possible feature you can have for a truck,  especially a work truck.   I work in remote locations throughout the year and now that winter is coming, the truck is my life line for heat !!.   I spend my day hiking through snow and brush sweating in -35-40° temperatures and this is the first week catch up with the 2019 truck. I’ve lost a lot of hours of work because the truck shuts off and I didn’t know it,  come back to the truck for batteries, but nothing is changed and it’s off. No heat, no chargers working means no equipment for work and no pay.   

  This should’ve been an option that you could disable and because it’s not, Catch they should’ve had warning labels on the truck to let people know.  I really miss ford 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,284 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...