Jump to content

So the 2020 HD models standard bed is now longer ?

f8l vnm

Recommended Posts

f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

Can someone confirm this ?  I think they went from 6/6 inches to 6/9 inches .. Like Ford and their SD line 

 

Thanks k

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

Its in the press release:  https://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/vehicles/silveradohd/2020.html

 

Quote

 

DuraBed: The segment’s most functional HD cargo box
The 2020 Silverado HD’s DuraBed builds on the breakthrough cargo box technologies and features introduced on the redesigned 2019 Silverado 1500 to offer the segment’s most functional HD bed.

For the first time on Silverado, the HD cargo boxes are not shared with the light-duty models. They are designed specifically for the HD with unique dimensions, but still incorporate the multi-piece inner panels (previously a single panel) design and strong, rolled-steel box construction featured on the Silverado 1500.

The multi-piece inner panels allow them to be pushed closer to box’s outer panels in certain areas, expanding the usable width by 6.7 inches on the standard box, compared to the current model. The box length is also about 3 inches longer on the standard box, extending length, adding volume and extra clearance for longer items. The long box length remains 8 feet long. With the extra width enabled by the multi-piece inner panel construction, the total cargo box volume expands 14 percent and about 9.5 percent, respectively, on the standard and long boxes. The larger volume for the long box — 83.5 cubic feet — is class-leading.

Standard Box (6’ 9”)

 

2020 Silverado HD

2019 Silverado HD

Dimension Change

Box Length at Floor:

82.2 in. (2089 mm)

78.8 in. (2003 mm)

+3.4 in. (86 mm)

Box Height:

21 in. (533 mm)

21.1 in. (536 mm)

-0.1 in (2.5 mm)

Box Width between Wheelhousings:

51.9 in. (1317 mm)

51 in. (1296 mm)

+0.9 in. (21 mm)

Max Box Volume:

69.6 cu. ft. (1970 L)

61 cu. ft. (1728 L)

+8.6 cu. ft. (242 L)

Box Lift-In Height:

38.9 in. (988 mm)

39.8 in. (1010 mm)

-0.9 in. (21 mm)


Long Box (8’)

 

2020 Silverado HD

2019 Silverado HD

Dimension Change

Box Length at Floor:

98.3 in. (2496 mm)

97.8 in. (2483 mm)

+0.5 in. (13 mm)

Box Height:

21 in. (533 mm)

21.2 in. (536 mm)

-0.2 in (3 mm)

Box Width between Wheelhousings:

50.6 in. (1284 mm)

51 in. (1296 mm)

-0.4 in. (12 mm)

Max Box Volume:

83.5 cu. ft. (2364 L)

76.4 cu. ft. (2162 L)

+7.1 cu. ft. (202 L)

Box Lift-In Height:

38.8 in. (986 mm)

39.6 in. (1005 mm)

-0.8 in. (19 mm)

 

I'd call it confirmed. 

CRApex Enthusiast

CRApex

Posted
Posted

What is the overall length on the Crew with standard bed?  I have a feeling it won't fit in my garage.

ApertureX Enthusiast

ApertureX

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CRApex said:

What is the overall length on the Crew with standard bed?  I have a feeling it won't fit in my garage.

Same media website linked above. There is A LOT of information there:

EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS

 

Regular Cab

Double Cab

Crew Cab

Wheelbase
(in. / mm):

141.5 / 3595 (long box)

149.4 / 3795 (std. box)
162.4 / 4127 (long box)

158.9 / 4037 (std. box)
172 / 4369 (long box)

Overall Length
(in. / mm):

235.5 / 5982 (long box)

240.4 / 6107 (std. box)
256.4 / 6514 (long box)

250 / 6349 (std. box)
266 / 6756 (long box)

Overall Width (in. / mm):

81.9 / 2079 (SRW)
96.7 / 2457 (DRW)

81.9 / 2079 (SRW)
96.7 / 2457 (DRW)

81.9 / 2079 (SRW)
96.7 / 2457 (DRW)

Overall Height
(in. / mm):

79.8 / 2027

79.8 / 2027

79.8 / 2027

Front Track
(in. / mm):

68.1 / 1731

68.1 / 1731

68.1 / 1731

Rear Track
(in. / mm):

68.3 / 1736 (SRW)
75 / 1905 (DRW)

68.3 / 1736 (SRW)
75 / 1905 (DRW)

68.3 / 1736 (SRW)
75 / 1905 (DRW)

m5guy Enthusiast

m5guy

Posted
Posted

Yep - Standard box, crew cab overall length now 10.5 inches longer.  I have 14 inches of clearance in my garage with my current '17 Denali.  Not parking outside (I'm too high maintenance for that).  Might be a deal breaker for me. :(

ApertureX Enthusiast

ApertureX

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, m5guy said:

Yep - Standard box, crew cab overall length now 10.5 inches longer.  I have 14 inches of clearance in my garage with my current '17 Denali.  Not parking outside (I'm too high maintenance for that).  Might be a deal breaker for me. :(

You'll still have 4" left. just put 2" in the front and 2" in the back using the new cameras. :D

 

 

 

P.S. Trying really hard not to post the all "inches" comments I have in my head right now.:angel:

m5guy Enthusiast

m5guy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ApertureX said:

You'll still have 4" left. just put 2" in the front and 2" in the back using the new cameras. :D

Sounds easy!  Not to get specific, but 3.5 inches - have to put inch and three-quarters on each end.  I've measured - very precisely.

ApertureX Enthusiast

ApertureX

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, m5guy said:

Sounds easy!  Not to get specific, but 3.5 inches - have to put inch and three-quarters on each end.  I've measured - very precisely.

Time for a remodel...

giphy.gif

CRApex Enthusiast

CRApex

Posted
Posted

It would fit in mine with roughly 1.5” on either side.  Chevrolet should have called me to find out my garage size before they designed the new trucks.

m5guy Enthusiast

m5guy

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, ApertureX said:

Time for a remodel...

giphy.gif

You, my friend, have your priorities right!  

  • 2 weeks later...
2018GMC Senior Enthusiast

2018GMC

Posted
Posted

The T1XX HD is larger in every aspect compared to K2xx HD. 

 

Yes, interior space improved but the truck is now taller, longer and wider. 

 

I wonder if fuel economy will be less than K2xx, like how people reporting in the half ton T1xx are getting less mpg than their K2xx.

 

Glad GM didn’t downsize the fuel tank in the HD like they did in the LD.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • PunchT37
      Oil Consumption

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...