Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Curious On this .

These “Catback” exhaust systems are just that, from the cat back replaced.

why pay all that money to replace GMs OEM piping which is already stainless!

 

The only gains you Get are from the muffler swap , taking the old muffler out with the flappers and replacing with a high flow muffler no flappers.

 

essentially that 13 HP gain for $2000 dollars can be had for around 200-300 dollars.

 

save your money people, replace the muffler you will get the same gains and sound or better lol.

 

as far as a cold air intake , get S&B , Volant or Cold Air Inductions. They make much better design intakes and filters. Disconnect the negative battery terminal during installation. This resets the ECM so it can re learn the fuel trims . 

 

No need to get GMs “Tune” . Its not a tune.

Edited by Chips
  • Like 3
Posted
39 minutes ago, Chips said:

Curious On this .

 

These “Catback” exhaust systems are just that, from the cat back replaced.

why pay all that money to replace GMs OEM piping which is already stainless!

 

The only gains you Get are from the muffler swap , taking the old muffler out with the flappers and replacing with a high flow muffler no flappers.

 

essentially that 13 HP gain for $2000 dollars can be had for around 200-300 dollars.

 

save your money people, replace the muffler you will get the same gains and sound or better lol.

 

as far as a cold air intake , get S&B , Volant or Cold Air Inductions. They make much better design intakes and filters. Disconnect the negative battery terminal during installation. This resets the ECM so it can re learn the fuel trims . 

 

No need to get GMs “Tune” . Its not a tune.

 

As of a couple months ago, the only emissions legal CAI was the GMPP.  Also, the GMPP exhaust does not cause any drone.  If you just get a muffler you'll may well get a drone.  You'll just have to research and try things.  All the reflash does is turn off the air filter minder.  

 

If you wind up with any rewards or discounts, you can beat $2k installed.  Even if you can't, the difference between $300 and $2000 over a 100,000 miles isn't significant.  At all in how much time and desire you have to fuss with stuff.

Posted
50 minutes ago, INTJ said:

 

As of a couple months ago, the only emissions legal CAI was the GMPP.  Also, the GMPP exhaust does not cause any drone.  If you just get a muffler you'll may well get a drone.  You'll just have to research and try things.  All the reflash does is turn off the air filter minder.  

 

If you wind up with any rewards or discounts, you can beat $2k installed.  Even if you can't, the difference between $300 and $2000 over a 100,000 miles isn't significant.  At all in how much time and desire you have to fuss with stuff.

 

Emissions legal? Must be talking Cali.

 

Anyway just thought it should be brought up you can buy just the muffler from borla and still get no drone and effectively accomplish the same thing.

 

A cat back exhaust system on these trucks wont produce much if any more than a muffler swap/ flapper delete. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Chips said:

 

Emissions legal? Must be talking Cali.

 

Anyway just thought it should be brought up you can buy just the muffler from borla and still get no drone and effectively accomplish the same thing.

 

A cat back exhaust system on these trucks wont produce much if any more than a muffler swap/ flapper delete. 

 

 

 

Not in CA and I will never live there.  Many states now follow CARB emissions standards, but there are federal emissions standards that all vehicles have to meet and as if a couple of months ago, none of the CAIs for the 2020 6.2 were legal.  

 

No doubt the muffler is the big issue, but when buying the GMPP/Borla, you are also paying for the testing and engineering that went into eliminating the drone and minimizing the helicopter sound.  That makes it worth the cost to many of us.  For those wanting to spend as little as possible, they will have to do their own research and testing.  

 

Neither choice is wrong, but people do need to be aware.......

Edited by INTJ
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, INTJ said:

 

Not is CA and I will never live there.  Many states now follow CARB emissions standards, but there are federal emissions standards that all vehicles have to meet and as if a couple of months ago, none of the CAIs for the 2020 6.2 were legal.  

 

No doubt the muffler is the big issue, but when buying the GMPP/Borla, you are also paying for the testing and engineering that went into eliminating the drone and minimizing the helicopter sound.  That makes it worth the cost to many of us.  For those wanting to spend as little as possible, they will have to do their own research and testing.  

 

Neither choice is wrong, but people do need to be aware.......

 

Edited by Tcolburntexas
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 7/26/2020 at 4:12 PM, Chips said:

 

Emissions legal? Must be talking Cali.

 

Anyway just thought it should be brought up you can buy just the muffler from borla and still get no drone and effectively accomplish the same thing.

 

A cat back exhaust system on these trucks wont produce much if any more than a muffler swap/ flapper delete. 

 

 

Just swapping in a Borla muffler will lead to drone.  If you do some more custom work or keep 1 or both flappers in you very well could reduce/stop the drone all together.

 

Don't get me wrong, I went with a custom setup myself and the GM performance exhaust is a joke IMO and not worth the money, but it does have minimal drone but it also adds next to no sound, so really what was the point?

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, 204Denali said:

Just swapping in a Borla muffler will lead to drone.  If you do some more custom work or keep 1 or both flappers in you very well could reduce/stop the drone all together.

 

Don't get me wrong, I went with a custom setup myself and the GM performance exhaust is a joke IMO and not worth the money, but it does have minimal drone but it also adds next to no sound, so really what was the point?

 

 

I don't know what GM Performance exhaust you heard, but it is not a "joke", very well-built, and DEFINITELY adds sound over stock.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

I don't know what GM Performance exhaust you heard, but it is not a "joke", very well-built, and DEFINITELY adds sound over stock.

I said imo, and that is fine its built good and has some sound, barely, over the stock setup.  But I don't buy exhaust systems purely for sound, that is a component but not the entire reason.  If you want sound and that is your goal, do a muffler swap.  I've put on or had made many exhaust setups over the years, some are worth their price tag, Corsa and corvette come to mind, where others are not.  Is the GM exhaust worth the price tag? nope, but like I said that is my opinion.

Edited by 204Denali
Posted
1 hour ago, 204Denali said:

 has some sound, barely, over the stock setup.  

Should probably turn your hearing aids up.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, bshort said:

Should probably turn your hearing aids up.  

Good one.  Defensive much.  Its not loud, sorry that hurts your feelings 

  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/24/2020 at 5:37 AM, 204Denali said:

I said imo, and that is fine its built good and has some sound, barely, over the stock setup.  But I don't buy exhaust systems purely for sound, that is a component but not the entire reason.  If you want sound and that is your goal, do a muffler swap.  I've put on or had made many exhaust setups over the years, some are worth their price tag, Corsa and corvette come to mind, where others are not.  Is the GM exhaust worth the price tag? nope, but like I said that is my opinion.

 

Why do you feel it is not worth the price tag?  It is not cheap but the exhaust with the CAI offer fully factory engineered and backed parts, K&N filter, better sound, better flow and a new factory tune tying it all together.  It makes a legitimate 15 hp and 9 ft.lbs. of torque over stock set up (link:  https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package)

 - so unless you want more sound - what is not to like, other than maybe the OEM pricing!   Fully engineered OEM system that makes real power - that is a good combination in my book.  I have it on my 6.2L AT4 and find the total package a pretty good deal. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Supercup said:

 

Why do you feel it is not worth the price tag?  It is not cheap but the exhaust with the CAI offer fully factory engineered and backed parts, K&N filter, better sound, better flow and a new factory tune tying it all together.  It makes a legitimate 15 hp and 9 ft.lbs. of torque over stock set up (link:  https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package)

 - so unless you want more sound - what is not to like, other than maybe the OEM pricing!   Fully engineered OEM system that makes real power - that is a good combination in my book.  I have it on my 6.2L AT4 and find the total package a pretty good deal. 

Mine didn't come with a K&N filter.

Posted
45 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

Mine didn't come with a K&N filter.

I could be wrong, but my buddy works at K&N and he told me they make the filter for GM, just like the K&N filter in my 2015 Z/28.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/10/2021 at 7:00 PM, Supercup said:

 

Why do you feel it is not worth the price tag?  It is not cheap but the exhaust with the CAI offer fully factory engineered and backed parts, K&N filter, better sound, better flow and a new factory tune tying it all together.  It makes a legitimate 15 hp and 9 ft.lbs. of torque over stock set up (link:  https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package)

 - so unless you want more sound - what is not to like, other than maybe the OEM pricing!   Fully engineered OEM system that makes real power - that is a good combination in my book.  I have it on my 6.2L AT4 and find the total package a pretty good deal. 

I don't see the value in it.  If we were talking the Corsa setup then I might agree.  Like I said I  am all about aftermarket setups if I see the benefit, all my summer cars have full setups from the headers back, Corsa on the Vette, Magnaflow on the Roush, but the GM perf exhaust I do not see the setup matching the price tag.  The muffler is basically the XR, which imo is not loud enough.  It just doesn't make enough sound for me.  Your basically paying the GM tax for the setup.  I put a custom mandrel bent setup on mine instead.

Your also taking the catback and combining it with the CAI for the numbers, which I'm not denying they are there, but not many are buying both. I also think the GM CAI is overpriced as well, plenty of other choices out there that cost less and look better, and put up good numbers.  I'm not after numbers, if that was what I  was looking for I'd be looking into heavy engine mods.  If I want to go fast, I pull out my car (when its not winter lol)

Edited by 204Denali
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Of course actually engaging four wheel drive is step one or even daring to use a ramp like that with a two wheel drive and getting into a mess because of it. As to 4 low, these last few years if its a GM half ton it may not even have low range. A lot of the newer pickups have a lot lower first gear in an automatic transmission then they once did as it was common at one time for a gas engine truck or even the older diesels to just sit there and bog the engine due to the torque converter stall point and not enough torque was generated on reasonable traction to even spin a tire or get out of its own way up a steep grade and 4 low HAD to be used to get enough power to four tires to get them turning. These days traction control systems may hinder a vehicle in a situation like that although that means a tire or tires are spinning so in some ways the traction control can reduce wild spinning and anyone can correct me on that but I think some vehicles cut traction control off in low range ?.    By the sounds of it and you may have the proper equipment but if your responsible for helping vehicles out if they are not able to get out under their own power, I would say to be using a nylon tow rope or have one available so that one is able to give a bit of a run to help sling shot them some initial momentum as most tow straps are made out of polypropylene and impart way too much shock load if used to jerk a stuck vehicle into motion but are totally fine to use if going more from almost a dead pull with the tow vehicle and they are a lot less expensive to replace if damaged. That and some soft shackles to hook onto closed loop tow hooks on the truck your pulling as well as you having the proper shackle insert in your truck so there are no bad accidents with metal clevises joining things together or chain on the end of a tow rope or tow balls being hooked onto etc flying and causing damage or worse if it lets go. Its always a challenge pulling people because some are clueless and will over run the tow rope or strap and drive over it or that risk of ramming into the back of the tow vehicle so usually a few instructions are needed to clue in the driver of the stuck truck. Yeah ... have fun out there 😉
    • In their own words:    https://blog.amsoil.com/how-engine-sludge-forms-and-how-to-prevent-it-2/   [Quote] Synthetic Oil Helps Prevent Sludge Fortunately, sludge and varnish deposits are something that can be controlled. Using thermally stable synthetic base oils reduces the rate of degradation (oxidation).   Antioxidant additives further help reduce the rate of degradation. One of the most widely used is zinc dithiophosphate. Not only is it an excellent oxidation inhibitor, but it is also an outstanding anti-wear additive.   High-Quality Additives Fight Sludge Fortunately, it is possible to address many of the issues that occur after the initial oxidation stage. Additives, such as detergents and dispersants, help promote the suspension of contaminants within the oil and keep them from agglomerating.   Detergents, which are also alkaline in nature, assist in neutralizing acids generated in the sludge-building process. Antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives are consumed during use.   To achieve maximum life expectancy, use a motor oil with high concentrations of antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives.  [End Quote]   So quality base oil and then the last sentence above. TBN and ZDP levels matter. The one thing not covered was sufficient viscosity. Sad.     And yet we now have since API SN lower amount of them all with the only real change being a slight up tick in base oil selection. Along with lower concentrations of everything that makes oil work and lower and lower viscosity there is still an insistence on longer OCI's.    How low does the peanut butter and jelly level have to get before we say it's just white bread folded?    The new smoke and mirror treatment is the 'additives are INVISIBLE' to UOA testing with a health dose of TRUST ME.    I'm not picking on AMSOIL. This is coming from all of them. Every last one of them that abandon the low wear model in favor of the high mpg/EPA compliance model. 
    • First off use it in the way you’re more comfortable. In working in off road situations most of my life I used 4WD low range very little. In most cases when equipped I used auto 4WD. If I wanted maximum control going up and down very steep terrain  I used low range. Especially if I was driving a diesel. Same with very rutted terrain. In very muddy or snowy conditions I wanted momentum so high range worked well for that. With gravel ramps with limited traction I would try high range first. I would want smooth even increasing speed if I was fighting traction. Low range could give you too much to the wheels breaking traction trying to move. 
    • Having owned 4wd vehicle since the 1970s I find there are varying opinions on how to use 4wd, every owner is an expert in their minds.  IMO, 4LO is the appropriate gear and what I would use,  You have to feather the gas to avoid spinning tires and the lower the gear the better chance.  But like I said you will find those that think their method is best.  I live near a boat launch.  Yesterday there was a new Ford Maverick pulling out a pontoon boat almost 2x its size, they had no problems and they don't have a LO range.   True story. One winter day not long ago I was coming out of small town post office and there was a F150 4wd parked in front and was stuck foot deep snow ruts. I knew the lady so I asked her to put it in 4wd (wondering why in the middle of a 2-day snow storm she wasn't).  Her reply surprised me, "my husband" (the expert) told me not use that because it uses too much gas. She finally got unstuck spinning in 2wd which likely used more gas than not.  
    • Your tire pressure issue may just be batteries, you can reset them using tge Ing switch (I think) and the owner's  manual. ChatGTP will b e a faster, better help than Google.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...