Jump to content

Oil Recommendation


Stonehenge

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, AtlasFBG2 said:

If you look at the uao for the 5.3 where 0w20 and 5w30 was used on the same engine the wear numbers are real close.

 

The 5w30 does show slightly lower wear numbers on copper.

 

Yes the benefit of 20 weight is for MPG

The question I have is...does the AFM need the 0W20? Does that system operate better off of the 0W20? Do the lifters operate under a certain pressure that is in tune with what the 0W20 provides? Like will they collapse and fill as quickly with the 30 weight? 

 

I personally would rather run a 5W30, but I'm afraid of doing something like that until I start hearing from others (I mean a lot of others) that do it regularly with success. And I just haven't seems that yet. Maybe the engine just isn't old enough and too many people didn't want to chance it under warranty? But those 100,000 mile drivetrain warranties in the 2014's are just about up...and the newer models only have a 70,000 drivetrain warranty.

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
2 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

The question I have is...does the AFM need the 0W20? Does that system operate better off of the 0W20? Do the lifters operate under a certain pressure that is in tune with what the 0W20 provides? Like will they collapse and fill as quickly with the 30 weight? 

 

I personally would rather run a 5W30, but I'm afraid of doing something like that until I start hearing from others (I mean a lot of others) that do it regularly with success. And I just haven't seems that yet. Maybe the engine just isn't old enough and too many people didn't want to chance it under warranty? But those 100,000 mile drivetrain warranties in the 2014's are just about up...and the newer models only have a 70,000 drivetrain warranty.

 

Can I ask a question? The 4.3 and the 5.3 share the same thermostats, water pumps, oil pumps, lifters, filters and VLOM parts. Go ahead look them up. GM calls for 0W20 in a 5.3 but 5W30 for the 4.3. Why??? Okay, there is no question. GM provided the answer to a question that wasn't being asked. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Can I ask a question? The 4.3 and the 5.3 share the same thermostats, water pumps, oil pumps, lifters, filters and VLOM parts. Go ahead look them up. GM calls for 0W20 in a 5.3 but 5W30 for the 4.3. Why??? Okay, there is no question. GM provided the answer to a question that wasn't being asked. 

Same oil pump and oil pressure? And the 4.3 has the variable valve timing? How many lifters collapse when AFM activates? 2? 

 

I gather what you're saying is, GM is doing this just for CAFE regulations and fuel economy, right?  Makes sesne, I just didn't realize the 4.3 is that similar to the 5.3

Posted
23 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

The question I have is...does the AFM need the 0W20? Does that system operate better off of the 0W20? Do the lifters operate under a certain pressure that is in tune with what the 0W20 provides? Like will they collapse and fill as quickly with the 30 weight? 

 

I personally would rather run a 5W30, but I'm afraid of doing something like that until I start hearing from others (I mean a lot of others) that do it regularly with success. And I just haven't seems that yet. Maybe the engine just isn't old enough and too many people didn't want to chance it under warranty? But those 100,000 mile drivetrain warranties in the 2014's are just about up...and the newer models only have a 70,000 drivetrain warranty.

The 6.2 in the trucks spec 0w20. The same 6.2 in the Camaro up through 2018 spec 5w30. The same 6.2 in the 2019 Camaro spec 0w40 but says 5w30 can be used for street use. The 5.3 in trucks spec 0w20 and the 4.3 spec 5w30. All engines use AFM.

 

So i would say the AFM does not need 0w20. Does it operate better off the 0w20? I would say yes in my personal experiance so far.

 

On my 4.3 i used 5w30 up till last oil change at 36500 miles when i filled it with 0w20. It goes into v4 mode alot more and stays in v4 longer than it did with 5w30. It has only been almost a week so more time is needed.

 

The 2016 model year started the 60000 mile powertrain warranty. 14 and 15 had the 100000 mile powertrain warranty.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

Same oil pump and oil pressure? And the 4.3 has the variable valve timing? How many lifters collapse when AFM activates? 2? 

 

I gather what you're saying is, GM is doing this just for CAFE regulations and fuel economy, right?  Makes sesne, I just didn't realize the 4.3 is that similar to the 5.3

Yes the 4.3 has VVT and it shuts off the 2 middle cylinders when in v4 mode.

 

My 4.3 did drop about 5 psi at hot idle when i switched to 0w20

Posted
11 minutes ago, AtlasFBG2 said:

The 6.2 in the trucks spec 0w20. The same 6.2 in the Camaro up through 2018 spec 5w30. The same 6.2 in the 2019 Camaro spec 0w40 but says 5w30 can be used for street use. The 5.3 in trucks spec 0w20 and the 4.3 spec 5w30. All engines use AFM.

 

So i would say the AFM does not need 0w20. Does it operate better off the 0w20? I would say yes in my personal experiance so far.

 

On my 4.3 i used 5w30 up till last oil change at 36500 miles when i filled it with 0w20. It goes into v4 mode alot more and stays in v4 longer than it did with 5w30. It has only been almost a week so more time is needed.

 

The 2016 model year started the 60000 mile powertrain warranty. 14 and 15 had the 100000 mile powertrain warranty.

I read that the AFM activates much more frequently in the 5.3 than the 4.3 - you mentioned since switching to the 0W20 that you've noticed it going into V4 mode much more frequently - I wonder if the oil has something to do with the 5.3 activating more frequently? Kind of doubt it, Imagine that's a factory software demand to keep fuel economy as optimal as possible in the V8 

Posted
10 minutes ago, AtlasFBG2 said:

Yes the 4.3 has VVT and it shuts off the 2 middle cylinders when in v4 mode.

 

My 4.3 did drop about 5 psi at hot idle when i switched to 0w20

The cure for that is the 180F thermostat. That said, are you gauging the pressure by the dash gauge or a scan tool? Hot idle for me is 20-22 psi by scan tool. Shows one needle width under 40 psi on the dash. Matted the dash shows 75-80 psi but a gauge shows 50-52 psi. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

I read that the AFM activates much more frequently in the 5.3 than the 4.3 - you mentioned since switching to the 0W20 that you've noticed it going into V4 mode much more frequently - I wonder if the oil has something to do with the 5.3 activating more frequently? Kind of doubt it, Imagine that's a factory software demand to keep fuel economy as optimal as possible in the V8 

I read the same thing. The 6.2 guys seems to be in v4 mode the most from what i have read. The more torque the engine makes the more it would be in v4 mode. Dont think it has anything to do with software.

 

I only switched to 0w20 as a experiment to see if v4 did work more often. I might do a second run with 0w20 if the uao looks good. But after that i will be back to 5w30

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

I read that the AFM activates much more frequently in the 5.3 than the 4.3 - you mentioned since switching to the 0W20 that you've noticed it going into V4 mode much more frequently - I wonder if the oil has something to do with the 5.3 activating more frequently? Kind of doubt it, Imagine that's a factory software demand to keep fuel economy as optimal as possible in the V8 

5.3 in V4 is a 2.65 liter motor. 4.3 in V4 mode is a 2.86 liter motor. Ain't that a hoot! 

 

AFM is a load based program. Less viscous oil = less load = being on more. Worked that way with mine as well. 

 

23 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

Same oil pump and oil pressure? And the 4.3 has the variable valve timing? How many lifters collapse when AFM activates? 2? 

 

I gather what you're saying is, GM is doing this just for CAFE regulations and fuel economy, right?  Makes sesne, I just didn't realize the 4.3 is that similar to the 5.3

AtalsFBG2 answered part of this. Drops the two center cylinders. Yep, motors are sisters. Right, CAFE. 

 

Do what you're comfortable with. It's your truck. Show it some love brother. 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

The cure for that is the 180F thermostat. That said, are you gauging the pressure by the dash gauge or a scan tool? Hot idle for me is 20-22 psi by scan tool. Shows one needle width under 40 psi on the dash. Matted the dash shows 75-80 psi but a gauge shows 50-52 psi. 

180F thermostat too cold for here in Ohio.

 

Going by oil gauge on dash. It is right at the 35 psi mark now. Used to be just under 40 psi before. I will hook up my scan tool tomarrow and see if it shows oil pressure.

Posted
Just now, AtlasFBG2 said:

180F thermostat too cold for here in Ohio.

 

Going by oil gauge on dash. It is right at the 35 psi mark now. Used to be just under 40 psi before. I will hook up my scan tool tomarrow and see if it shows oil pressure.

I'm just west of Chicago and run a 180 F. It was GM's gold standard for over 50 years. I have plenty of heat. Warms quickly. Oil runs around 198 F winter, 208-210 F summer. Computers is happy as a clam at high tide. Perfect....Just say' n. However if that seems to cold you could use the GM 197 F unit mentioned several times in this thread. It won't hurt a thing. 10 degrees in the right direction. 

Posted

The debate rages on!  Like 3k oil changes they are gone and should be like the Elvis....0W-20's and 16's are next!  Less wear at start and Operating temp folks....Who cares what the outside temperature is?  If it's cold great!  If it's HOT what does that matter the engines run Hotter?  unless your engine is not working accordingly it protects and cools it much more efficiently....too

Posted

PeppersReport.thumb.png.344430e8c0f8056a07ed5a385dc1fbca.png

 

This graph is Peppers life time hand calculated fuel history. The life time average in orange and the 36 tank moving average in blue. the peaks are summer, the lows are winter. She has 87,000 mile on her now. The first 10K miles individual tank numbers were lost to a computer hard drive crash. Those miles I only have the averages for. 24 mpg and small change. 207 F thermostat. Trans stat as OEM and 5W30 Mobil 1. Right at the EPA estimate. Most people can't get that number. National average for this combination is 17 mpg. 

 

The far right peak is last summer and the end point is the end of this past winter. Yes, her winter average for the 2018/2019 winter is higher than the 2017 summer and over 1 mpg over the life time average. The 2017 summer higher that the EPA numbers by over 3 mpg. Summer over summer gains of 2 mpg. 7 to 8 % gains year over year. 

 

Over this entire history the driving has remained a constant. I'm a double nickel guy. I'm a rural driver. I don't short hop and I'm meticulous about maintenance. I live in up state Illinois and have a range of about 350 miles one way from home. So yes the deck is stacked but constant so the reflected changes are in the oil choice and heat management. The entire project has been data driven.

 

Reflect on this a minute. If last summers peak 36 tank moving average was touching nearly 30 mpg...what were the individual peak tank numbers?  24 tanks over 30 mpg with a high of 33.3 coming home from Des Moines. I average 396 miles per tank but my tank fills are roughly 13 gallons. Half a tank for 400 miles. 

 

If you go to a less viscous oil and the temperature falls the shear was too high. 

If you go to a less viscous oil and the temperature rises the boundary layer isn't thick enough and wear is on the rise.

If you go to a more viscous oil and the temperature falls your oil film was too thin.

If you go to a more viscous oil and the temperature rises the drag is to high.

If you cool the motor and fuel efficiency rises the boundary was to thin.

If you cool the motor and the fuel efficiency falls the oil is too viscous.

 

This is all cause and effect. Physics at work. When fuel prices hover $3 a gallon this sort of result makes $12 a quart oil cheap.

 

5,000 OCI at 24 mpg and $3 a gallon is  $625 in fuel. 28 mpg is $536 in fuel. $89 per oil change in fuel savings. Six quart difference? $14.88 a quart. I'm not wasting money using this oil or changing it this often. 

 

 

Posted

I like Grumpy Bears logic and a long time fan.

 

Only thing he didn’t touch on is below freezing starts. With 0-w20 oil below freezing it will crank over slow like your battery is low. I counter with half a quart of Slick50 synthetic engine oil treatment...fires quicker because there is lube left on parts in the engine.

 

Grumpy Bear is correct, thicker oil like what is recommended for the 4.3L will be less wear....better winter starts.

 

Simple test is the below freezing crank start test. Needs no further data.

Posted
13 hours ago, Jacoby said:

Who the hell is Pepper?

LOL I name my trucks. Pepper is my trucks name. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...