Jump to content

Flex Fuel Conversion

Stonehenge

By Stonehenge
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

Stonehenge Enthusiast

Stonehenge

Posted
Posted

I have a 2017 5.3l non flex fuel l83.  Looks like there are some conversion kits out there.  CJPerformance (http://www.cjtunes.com/store/flex-fuel-conversions/14plus-gm-truckssuv-flex-fuel-conversion/) offers a conversion kit.  Anyone done this? 

 

I have a BlackBear Performance tune, I inquired about an E85 tune before I realized my vehicle was not flex fuel.  I was told that I don't need an E-85 tune specific, that the 93+ tune they provided me would work with E85, that the computer would adjust to the E85 fuel.  Would that logic change if I use this CJPerformance kit?

 

 

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SinisterZ71
SinisterZ71

I've got a 2018 Silverado K1500 extended cab short bed that did NOT come with the flex fuel option.   I ordered a Continental brand flex fuel sensor p/n: 13577429 and Flex Fuel Sensor Rear l

CamGTP
CamGTP

Yes, the sensor and a tune will allow you to run E85.   Once everything in the computer is enabled it will work as if it came that way from the factory.   I'm currently running som

Mike GMC
Mike GMC

Besides the fuel sensor, what comes in the "kit"?  Why not just buy GM OEM parts?  They seem to work pretty well.

Posted Images

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted (edited)

A non flex fuel vehicle will not compensate for the E85, whoever said it is an idiot.

 

The computer has to known the real alcohol content to make real time adjustments and it has to be setup in the tune to use it. Without a real sensor it can't alter the stoich ratio for the fuel nor can it use the flex fuel features such as spark advanced changes or commanded fueling under power enrichment to use the E85 or mix of fuel to the best of it's abilities.

 

DSX tuning also offers a flex fuel kit or you can buy the parts and plumb it yourself to save money. That is, if you can do your own work and wiring.

 

I have no experience with black bear as I do all my own tuning but I can only hope they are smart enough to know how to enable that feature and use the tables in the calibration to provide the customer with what they want.

Edited by CamGTP
Stonehenge Enthusiast

Stonehenge

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

A non flex fuel vehicle will not compensate for the E85, whoever said it is an idiot.

 

The computer has to known the real alcohol content to make real time adjustments and it has to be setup in the tune to use it. Without a real sensor it can't alter the stoich ratio for the fuel nor can it use the flex fuel features such as spark advanced changes or commanded fueling under power enrichment to use the E85 or mix of fuel to the best of it's abilities.

 

DSX tuning also offers a flex fuel kit or you can buy the parts and plumb it yourself to save money. That is, if you can do your own work and wiring.

 

I have no experience with black bear as I do all my own tuning but I can only hope they are smart enough to know how to enable that feature and use the tables in the calibration to provide the customer with what they want.

Thanks for the insight.  And to BlackBear's defense I am sure they were acting under the assumption my vehicle was already flex fuel compatible.  It wasn't until after I inquired that I realized it wasn't.

 

Stonehenge Enthusiast

Stonehenge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So I reached out again with BlackBear and they stated they can absolutely enable the flex fuel routines for a flex fuel conversion kit.  The sensor has to be installed prior to any tuning being provided.   

 

Of the two flex fuel conversions, CJ or DSX, I think I am going to go the DSX route. 

 
Appreciate the input CamGTP!
Mike GMC Enthusiast

Mike GMC

Posted
Posted (edited)

Besides the fuel sensor, what comes in the "kit"?  Why not just buy GM OEM parts?  They seem to work pretty well.

Edited by Mike GMC
  • Like 1
Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted

Either kit will work and they are both priced pretty similar.  I have the DSX kit in my CTSV and its a quality setup. 

 

Let us know how the install goes

Stonehenge Enthusiast

Stonehenge

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Mike GMC said:

Besides the fuel sensor, what comes in the "kit"?  Why not just buy GM OEM parts?  They seem to work pretty well.

I'm not exactly sure what's the difference. 

Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted

Im pretty sure its all GM parts preassembled that you're just buying from someone else for an upcharge

AtlasFBG2 Enthusiast

AtlasFBG2

Posted
Posted

I think all the OEM parts needed to do the conversion are listed in this thread with part numbers.

 

 

Should be able to order those parts online cheaper than what the conversion kits cost.

JONBLARC7 Enthusiast

JONBLARC7

Posted
Posted

Your wasting your money going with those expensive kits.   I just did this to my CREW CAB 2014 6.2 for about 60 bucks.  Then I enabled it in the tune with HP tuner myself.  You can just get Black Bear to do it.

 

You need to watch this video from Pmoore4321.  The reason I capitalized CREW CAD is the fuel lines are a little different from his Reg cab to a crew cab.  On mine I placed the sensor right where the soft line from the fuel tank makes a connection too the hard lines.  If you just unclip the soft line from the little clips that hold it down there is enough slack to fit the sensors and the fitting  right where the soft line make a 90% turn.

 

Then just cut wires for the sensor connector and solder or crimp.  And extend those three wires about 25" to reach the new location of the sensor.  I was done in about 30 mines from start to finish.  It the easiest and best dollar for dollar mod you can do.

 

He also has two other videos you can watch about E85 convertion.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Stonehenge Enthusiast

Stonehenge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I guess I am not patient enough.  I ordered the DSX kit then after doing so got all of this great advice.  Oh well...  I constantly see inquiries about easy performance mods.  See Headers, CAI, Cat back pretty common but seldom see mention of FlexFuel conversion.  It seems to be the best bang for your buck performance mod whether you spend $300 like I did or get it accomplished for under a $100. 

Jacoby Enthusiast

Jacoby

Posted
Posted

Either way it’s gonna be worth the cost once you start running E85. The performance boost is well worth the cost

JONBLARC7 Enthusiast

JONBLARC7

Posted
Posted

I agree 100%. I was getting ready to pull the trigger on the CJ kit too.  Then i just happen to come across this video.  it is well worth it.  Gas milage not so much.  But filling up for 45.00 to 50.00 bucks is worth it.  Performance really worth it.

tyler.frost92 Enthusiast

tyler.frost92

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, JONBLARC7 said:

Pm me if you have any question or I can take pictures of my set up.

I wouldnt mind some pics, If i do it the way youre talking about ill be close to the driveshaft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      In their own words:    https://blog.amsoil.com/how-engine-sludge-forms-and-how-to-prevent-it-2/   [Quote] Synthetic Oil Helps Prevent Sludge Fortunately, sludge and varnish deposits are something that can be controlled. Using thermally stable synthetic base oils reduces the rate of degradation (oxidation).   Antioxidant additives further help reduce the rate of degradation. One of the most widely used is zinc dithiophosphate. Not only is it an excellent oxidation inhibitor, but it is also an outstanding anti-wear additive.   High-Quality Additives Fight Sludge Fortunately, it is possible to address many of the issues that occur after the initial oxidation stage. Additives, such as detergents and dispersants, help promote the suspension of contaminants within the oil and keep them from agglomerating.   Detergents, which are also alkaline in nature, assist in neutralizing acids generated in the sludge-building process. Antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives are consumed during use.   To achieve maximum life expectancy, use a motor oil with high concentrations of antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives.  [End Quote]   So quality base oil and then the last sentence above. TBN and ZDP levels matter. The one thing not covered was sufficient viscosity. Sad.     And yet we now have since API SN lower amount of them all with the only real change being a slight up tick in base oil selection. Along with lower concentrations of everything that makes oil work and lower and lower viscosity there is still an insistence on longer OCI's.    How low does the peanut butter and jelly level have to get before we say it's just white bread folded?    The new smoke and mirror treatment is the 'additives are INVISIBLE' to UOA testing with a health dose of TRUST ME.    I'm not picking on AMSOIL. This is coming from all of them. Every last one of them that abandon the low wear model in favor of the high mpg/EPA compliance model. 
    • KARNUT
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By KARNUT · Posted

      First off use it in the way you’re more comfortable. In working in off road situations most of my life I used 4WD low range very little. In most cases when equipped I used auto 4WD. If I wanted maximum control going up and down very steep terrain  I used low range. Especially if I was driving a diesel. Same with very rutted terrain. In very muddy or snowy conditions I wanted momentum so high range worked well for that. With gravel ramps with limited traction I would try high range first. I would want smooth even increasing speed if I was fighting traction. Low range could give you too much to the wheels breaking traction trying to move. 
    • Z45
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By Z45 · Posted

      Having owned 4wd vehicle since the 1970s I find there are varying opinions on how to use 4wd, every owner is an expert in their minds.  IMO, 4LO is the appropriate gear and what I would use,  You have to feather the gas to avoid spinning tires and the lower the gear the better chance.  But like I said you will find those that think their method is best.  I live near a boat launch.  Yesterday there was a new Ford Maverick pulling out a pontoon boat almost 2x its size, they had no problems and they don't have a LO range.   True story. One winter day not long ago I was coming out of small town post office and there was a F150 4wd parked in front and was stuck foot deep snow ruts. I knew the lady so I asked her to put it in 4wd (wondering why in the middle of a 2-day snow storm she wasn't).  Her reply surprised me, "my husband" (the expert) told me not use that because it uses too much gas. She finally got unstuck spinning in 2wd which likely used more gas than not.  
    • dna9656
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By dna9656 · Posted

      Your tire pressure issue may just be batteries, you can reset them using tge Ing switch (I think) and the owner's  manual. ChatGTP will b e a faster, better help than Google.
    • Another JR
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By Another JR · Posted

      The thinking is that starting out in a higher gear makes it easier to avoid applying excessive torque when pressing the gas pedal. In a modern 4wd truck with 4 low and a limited slip or locking rear end, I would use 4 low and try to crawl up the ramp. Sometimes if they are too slippery, you have to back up to let the boat have some bouyancy, and then accelerate briskly to get some momentum to help you pull the through the slippery parts. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...