Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just a guess but as the boiling point of ethanol is 173 F and bulk oil temperatures exceed that by a wide margin in any vehicle driven at least an hour any working CCV/PCV system should remove that fuel in its entirety, correct? 🤔

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Just a guess but as the boiling point of ethanol is 173 F and bulk oil temperatures exceed that by a wide margin in any vehicle driven at least an hour any working CCV/PCV system should remove that fuel in its entirety, correct? 🤔

In general I would agree that evaporation would have an impact, combustion would do most the work considering the oxygen component of ethanol.  

As you know the BP of gasoline ranges from ~ 100 - 400F so when the two fuels are mixed it affects both the ethanol component too. 

When testing deposits of spark and compression engines ethanol acted more like a cooling agent, octane booster, and solvent, even in vapor phase. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, customboss said:

In general I would agree that evaporation would have an impact, combustion would do most the work considering the oxygen component of ethanol.  

As you know the BP of gasoline ranges from ~ 100 - 400F so when the two fuels are mixed it affects both the ethanol component too. 

When testing deposits of spark and compression engines ethanol acted more like a cooling agent, octane booster, and solvent, even in vapor phase. 

 

Law of Partial Pressure. Yes... How silly of me to forget such a basic law. 

 

All said and done then more ethanol reduces fuel dilution and cleans the combustion chamber????

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Law of Partial Pressure. Yes... How silly of me to forget such a basic law. 

 

All said and done then more ethanol reduces fuel dilution and cleans the combustion chamber????

Essentially correct! 

Posted

Im really tempted to not even mix and do a full tank of e85 and see how it goes. The engine light on the dash might be annoying after awhile. Even worse I wonder if the ECU will compensate too much and put the truck into limp mode.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Slvrado said:

Im really tempted to not even mix and do a full tank of e85 and see how it goes. The engine light on the dash might be annoying after awhile. Even worse I wonder if the ECU will compensate too much and put the truck into limp mode.

 

 

I’ve never seen limp mode but the light is irritating. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, customboss said:

I’ve never seen limp mode but the light is irritating. 

 

Idea tossed out here. Injectors have a physical limit. It's why the Flex Fuel models had larger injectors/pumps/regulators or some combination of them all. At some point the just run out volume if the alcohol content it beyond their ability and the motor at THAT point will indeed go lean. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, customboss said:

I’ve never seen limp mode but the light is irritating. 

Have you tried a full tank of E85?

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Slvrado said:

Have you tried a full tank of E85?

 

 

Not in the  2022 Trail Boss.  The VW GTI pictured ran E85- E100 all the time.  I have run E85 at full strength in many non modded or ethanol spec'd cars and trucks with no issues all the way back to the 90's.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Idea tossed out here. Injectors have a physical limit. It's why the Flex Fuel models had larger injectors/pumps/regulators or some combination of them all. At some point the just run out volume if the alcohol content it beyond their ability and the motor at THAT point will indeed go lean. 

Thats true but it would be better to design the engine from ground up to burn ethanol so you optimize the head, pistons etc for mechanical energy benefit. 

 

Trying to make gasoline spec'd engines with modified fueling idealize ethanol fuels is only a part of the equation.  But thats reality. 

Posted (edited)

Got my first oil report back today. 15k on the truck and 4800 on this oil. Oil was Motul 8100. Looks good. I was worried about the fuel content after hearing that might be a problem with these. But no concerns here. I used amsoil after draining the Motul to do a comparison. Probably will go 6k or so on the amsoil. 

Screenshot_20220621-174857_Samsung Notes.jpg

Edited by CoolHandWayne
  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, customboss said:

Thats true but it would be better to design the engine from ground up to burn ethanol so you optimize the head, pistons etc for mechanical energy benefit. 

 

Trying to make gasoline spec'd engines with modified fueling idealize ethanol fuels is only a part of the equation.  But thats reality. 

 

I don't know about from the ground up. Flame speed is a bit quicker for alcohol and the detonation resistance is greater. So...less timing and more compression pressure BMEP (different than compression ratio). Could a fresh sheet design with a mechanical compression ration be of value? Perhaps but VVT and the ECU handle that within the programed alcohol content limits of the motor. VVT/VVL are there for more than passive EGR. Guys run Pikes Peak with alcohol mechanical ratios on gasoline that would frag a sea level motor in example and case in point. IVC angle is paramount. 😉 

 

Know why the Brits don't have skyscrapers? They can't figure out a way to complicate a hammer.

No need of over complicate something that really is that simple. 

 

*********************

 

True about partial pressures. That said separating hydrocarbons and alcohols by boiling point in mixtures IS the art of distillation. Call me crazy but it was sort of my life's work. If the oil temp is above 173 F the alcohol is coming out as are most of the hydrocarbons with a boiling point less than the bulk oil temperature. The crankcase is an atmospheric column without a tray or reflux stream. Meaning the 'cut' for the hydrocarbons is not perfect but it is the cut. The alcohol cut however is a finite cut. When GC fuels are shown it is primarily those whose boing point is between the bulk oil temperature and the fuels 'end point'. It isn't maybe. It just is. If not then refineries are a myth and my life was a dream. 

 

:P

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I don't know about from the ground up. Flame speed is a bit quicker for alcohol and the detonation resistance is greater. So...less timing and more compression pressure BMEP (different than compression ratio). Could a fresh sheet design with a mechanical compression ration be of value? Perhaps but VVT and the ECU handle that within the programed alcohol content limits of the motor. VVT/VVL are there for more than passive EGR. Guys run Pikes Peak with alcohol mechanical ratios on gasoline that would frag a sea level motor in example and case in point. IVC angle is paramount. 😉 

 

Know why the Brits don't have skyscrapers? They can't figure out a way to complicate a hammer.

No need of over complicate something that really is that simple. 

 

*********************

 

True about partial pressures. That said separating hydrocarbons and alcohols by boiling point in mixtures IS the art of distillation. Call me crazy but it was sort of my life's work. If the oil temp is above 173 F the alcohol is coming out as are most of the hydrocarbons with a boiling point less than the bulk oil temperature. The crankcase is an atmospheric column without a tray or reflux stream. Meaning the 'cut' for the hydrocarbons is not perfect but it is the cut. The alcohol cut however is a finite cut. When GC fuels are shown it is primarily those whose boing point is between the bulk oil temperature and the fuels 'end point'. It isn't maybe. It just is. If not then refineries are a myth and my life was a dream. 

 

:P

 

 

 

At one of my old gigs at Cummins we purpose built a Turbo 4 2.8L E85 engine I have shared links for here and we went deep into all you mention and it worked better than using a diesel or gasoline design with ECM and injectors changes. 

 

I agree with everything else you shared and your refining background is solid! 

 

I have been testing Maverik E15 but caught them calling it 87 octane here at 7800' msl in Alamosa CO when in fact it was a 86. See data sheet and note who's blending it for them.  Its never less than 12.5% thus min 86. I did talk to Maverik tech folks about that.  The product runs well with minimal timing pull.  It burns very clean. Maverik :Phillips 66 831978 - SDS E15.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
20 hours ago, CoolHandWayne said:

Got my first oil report back today. 15k on the truck and 4800 on this oil. Oil was Motul 8100. Looks good. I was worried about the fuel content after hearing that might be a problem with these. But no concerns here. I used amsoil after draining the Motul to do a comparison. Probably will go 6k or so on the amsoil. 

Screenshot_20220621-174857_Samsung Notes.jpg

Wish they would do FTIR and KF water,GC fuels. I guarantee you the fuels dilution is at least 1% or higher. 

Posted

Okay, 15 gallons of e85 and 4 gallons of 87. Truck runs smooth, but the CEL did come on as expected. 
 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have A 2020 1500 5.3 8 speed. LTZ. Transmission problems since 60,000 miles. Started when I go to store in morning to get my morning coffee before work leave truck running get back in put it in drive/ rev no movement step on gas a little slams into gear. Put in neutral step on gas little shake then put in gear and gose.  Shut truck off start .. ok now at stop light stop truck after a few seconds feel a little kick if that doesn’t happen stuck in 3/4 gear shut truck off wait few seconds and start usually ok again. If you down shift manually ok as long as you get into 1st before stop. If not it kicks . I WANT A NEW TRANSMISSION. Now I want a new truck it just hit 80,000 IDK IF ILL BUY CHEVY CAUSE THEY STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM AND REFUSE TO RECALL . Oh I’ve changed the fluid and filter 3 times now. And yes used mobile 1 not ac/delco cause it’s not meeting the requirements that mobile is did use ac/delco filter 
    • Of course refrain from political debate but I myself have very dismal hope for what is all going on up here every where we turn so I nodded my head when I saw this joke.     
    • I'm looking at carpal tunnel surgery on my left hand and lumbar fusion. 
    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...