Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Low Elevation said:

Well they were the first to crack the new corvette ecu. So I would say this is the real deal. 
https://gmauthority.com/blog/2022/05/trifecta-becomes-first-company-to-natively-tune-c8-corvette-ecu/

 

Until GM says Trifecta is a partner I’m suspect. I retired in 2014 from Cummins and military grade encryption wasn’t being defeated by outside programmers nor have I seen anyone do it except backdoor patch piggyback systems that usually fail on new GM products. I’m all ears and eyes. Thanks for sharing. 

Posted
14 hours ago, customboss said:

The air intake is located upper left hand side ( drivers side under hood facing up).  Turbo air flow restriction NOT A PLAYER. I have pictures on this site of my trail boss buried in snow up to 

lower head lights and doing just fine. 

 

I don't plow but live in high snow area at 9000' msl in Southern CO. The front suspension is plenty 

tough to handle a once a week snow plowing.

 

You will need counter weight in bed as like majority of GM trucks its sprung too light in back over locking differential for my 2022 LTD

Trail Boss. I ended up needing about 720 lbs of sand tubes @ 60 lbs a piece.  

 

For a Custom it MAY not be stiff enough in front unless you have Z71 package or better shocks etc. 

 

Off topic All the sudden this site is wrapping wide on display is that happening to others or my browser? 


Thanks for the replies. I probably won’t be plowing with it this first winter but maybe next once it is broken in and I’m not terrified to put a scuff on it anymore. I will definitely. post of how it handles it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Update on the E85, engine light is back off, I suspect maybe the ECU finally adjusted enough in the 100 or so miles I've driven to not “run lean”. I will say there is a noticeable difference in bottom end torque, the truck on 87 feels torquey, but theres a difference on E85 that you can feel, I barely pass 2500rpm’s and the truck gets right up to speed.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Slvrado said:

Update on the E85, engine light is back off, I suspect maybe the ECU finally adjusted enough in the 100 or so miles I've driven to not “run lean”. I will say there is a noticeable difference in bottom end torque, the truck on 87 feels torquey, but theres a difference on E85 that you can feel, I barely pass 2500rpm’s and the truck gets right up to speed.

Light off in 100 miles? That’s really telling if you have over 50% ETOH content. Makes me think there is a ethanol fuel map embedded then. Hmmm.  Thanks for sharing. I can’t get E85 but when I can I’m gonna back up your testing. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah has to be over 50% ETOH in the tank especially at 15 gallons. Tired getting a family member with the same truck (2.7l) to run e85 with me and gather more data, but he called the dealership and “spoke with a mechanic” who said not to. So i guess ill be the only data point for now. I will say paying $3.99 for gas again is nice lol 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Slvrado said:

Yeah has to be over 50% ETOH in the tank especially at 15 gallons. Tired getting a family member with the same truck (2.7l) to run e85 with me and gather more data, but he called the dealership and “spoke with a mechanic” who said not to. So i guess ill be the only data point for now. I will say paying $3.99 for gas again is nice lol 

Your mpg will be interesting post 100 mile MIL code then disappearing. 

Posted

I was down to 11mpg all city with light on, since its gone off ive jumped up to 15mpg average

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Slvrado said:

I was down to 11mpg all city with light on, since its gone off ive jumped up to 15mpg average

Wow. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Slvrado said:

I was down to 11mpg all city with light on, since its gone off ive jumped up to 15mpg average

Do have a scanner to view dynamically?  I would like to see if you had a permanent MIL code set, the STFT and LTFT and timing at different RPM and loads.

 

If the MIL system corrected and extinguished the the light with no historical MIL code set then our L3B's are setup to correct for Ethanol fuels above 15% with no issues. 

 

Talk about a cheap improvement to HP, TQ and cleanliness!  

Posted
On 6/25/2022 at 4:31 PM, Mike Borowski said:

Aren’t there tunes for the 3.0 duramax?

Not yet but they are close

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 6/26/2022 at 2:14 PM, customboss said:

Do have a scanner to view dynamically?  I would like to see if you had a permanent MIL code set, the STFT and LTFT and timing at different RPM and loads.

 

If the MIL system corrected and extinguished the the light with no historical MIL code set then our L3B's are setup to correct for Ethanol fuels above 15% with no issues. 

 

Talk about a cheap improvement to HP, TQ and cleanliness!  

 

Everything past about 2001 is E-15 capable. 

 

https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2017-26-0072/

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I do not have a scanner, but the light did come back. It was 109 yesterday and I was driving the truck pretty hard so it could have attributed to it. Ill see if i can barrow a scanner from a GM buddy and log some data.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/25/2022 at 10:17 PM, customboss said:

Until GM says Trifecta is a partner I’m suspect. I retired in 2014 from Cummins and military grade encryption wasn’t being defeated by outside programmers nor have I seen anyone do it except backdoor patch piggyback systems that usually fail on new GM products. I’m all ears and eyes. Thanks for sharing. 

 

Side note, but military grade encryption? That's funny. The military doesn't come up with encryption algos, the computer science guys do. Military just uses standard off the shelf encryption algorithms, your bank or even this website are protected by the same stuff.

 

And while the encryption algorithm is not breakable, the truck comes with everything it needs to communicate which means the encryption keys probably have to be stored on the truck (much like a dvd player is crackable). Or there will be another way to crack in since all these devices don't operate on encrypted streams, they need to decrypt at some point in order to read the actual communications.

 

There is always a way in, it's just obfuscated a little more than in the past.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, the wanderer said:

 

Side note, but military grade encryption? That's funny. The military doesn't come up with encryption algos, the computer science guys do. Military just uses standard off the shelf encryption algorithms, your bank or even this website are protected by the same stuff.

 

And while the encryption algorithm is not breakable, the truck comes with everything it needs to communicate which means the encryption keys probably have to be stored on the truck (much like a dvd player is crackable). Or there will be another way to crack in since all these devices don't operate on encrypted streams, they need to decrypt at some point in order to read the actual communications.

 

There is always a way in, it's just obfuscated a little more than in the past.

 

“Military-grade” refers to AES-256 encryption. This standard was established in order to be in compliance with the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) that govern the handling of sensitive data. It offers 128-bit block encryption via the use of cryptographic keys.

 

Having said that I found out from my GM service manager who also races a Cadillac LTA with larger than stock twin turbo 6.2L V8 that there are 3 companies including Trifecta who has done the work to get into the GM ECU's and mod them.  So I was wrong about that. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You could try a used 1, they used that engine in the Astro vans, Plenty of them in the boneyard. Look for a wrecked or rotted 1 so the chance that it was scrapped for that reason and not a mechanical issue will be greater
    • Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • That computer lies!
    • My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...