Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I need to get mine done I’m at 5,000 miles and 43% pad life not as bad as some I’ve seen on here. I’m gonna get it done when I take it in for the seatbelt recall


If your over 6K they won’t reprogram it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
1 hour ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


If your over 6K they won’t reprogram it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

I won’t be when it goes in. Going to bring it in in the next week or 2 just broke 5,000miles

Posted

 

If your over 6K they won’t reprogram it

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Pretty sure they replace if over 6K but I was also well under

 

Posted
Pretty sure they replace if over 6K but I was also well under  


They aren’t supposed to


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
3 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


If your over 6K they won’t reprogram it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

I’m at 23k and they did. They were originally supposed to put on new pads, then said that was only for the Cadillac. So it was reset to 100%. They tell me that my pads weren’t showing any wear and our close to that. Maybe, those are almost all highway miles. But whatever. I’m just glad it’s not throwing up error messages any more, or showing 14%. 

Posted

It is an official recall for the 2019 Sierra soI assume for the Silverado also. Took about 45 mon for a software update. It shows 99 % now.

Posted
It is an official recall for the 2019 Sierra soI assume for the Silverado also. Took about 45 mon for a software update. It shows 99 % now.
Is there something else? A bulletin isn't the same as a recall.

Just curious because mine was fixed months ago and I never had a recall about it.

Since it's just something visual and not safety related, I can't imagine it was an actual recall.
Posted

When I went to mygmc.com it showed the recall. I took it to my dealer and they didn't know about it yet. When I told them it was on MYGMC.com they looked it up and said they had been updating them but were not aware of the recall but that it was right there. 

Posted (edited)

I found the receipt. The recall number is N192264451.

11/22/2019 N192264451 Customer Satisfaction: PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR NOTIFICATION
Edited by RVJ
Posted
I found the receipt. The recall number is N192264451.

11/22/2019 N192264451 Customer Satisfaction: PREMATURE BRAKE WEAR NOTIFICATION
That's interesting.  I do see the recalls now on the website and I also have 2 but they are these:

  • N192273510 -  Loose Alternator Cable
  • N192268090 - Brake System Malfunction Warning
I do NOT have N192264451 but I wonder if that's because I had it fixed already.  I wouldn't expect them to be that "on the ball" quite frankly, but maybe they have an OTA system capable of this. Just because I had it fixed prior to an official recall.

 

 

Posted

Mine shows the same 2 recalls needed but does not show the one I had done anywhere. If I would not have found the receipt I would have never come up with the number.

Posted

I dropped off my '19 Sierra with 3007 miles at the dealership to fizx the brake pad life indicator (currently at 62% on mostly highway miles), seatbelt fire hazard recall, and learned of a loose alternator cable recall as they were writing up the service ticket. Being honest, I am disappointed that there are 3 recalls on a $60,000 vehicle in the first two months of ownership.

Posted
I dropped off my '19 Sierra with 3007 miles at the dealership to fizx the brake pad life indicator (currently at 62% on mostly highway miles), seatbelt fire hazard recall, and learned of a loose alternator cable recall as they were writing up the service ticket. Being honest, I am disappointed that there are 3 recalls on a $60,000 vehicle in the first two months of ownership.

 

Well, it's 4. You should call them back up and ask about the Brake recall I mentioned. (N192268090) There are 2 apparently. One for Brake Life % and one for malfunction.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...