Jump to content

Jingle jingle underneath only in 2wd

Limelight
 Share

Recommended Posts

atst2000 Enthusiast

atst2000

Posted
Posted

Ok. I’m going to go ahead and be the guinea pig and let them do the fix lol. It looks like this is the supposed fix since it dates August 5, and this was the same info that my SA had. Cross your fingers everyone!  Truck goes in Monday. 

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Limelight
Limelight

Dude the constant trolling is old. You sold your “Sad Chevy” so move on and enjoy your Ford. Really-  head on over to that Forum and enjoy your truck and let us enjoy ours. Every brand has proble

Thejet07
Thejet07

Truck is ready to be picked up. I will look to see the numbers on my axle and take a picture. Shocked they called me late today and not late tomorrow. Gm also called me yesterday wanting to talk about

ILSilverado
ILSilverado

So the Truck is back and so far no noise at all. Let's hope it stays that way. Will post updates .

Posted Images

atst2000 Enthusiast

atst2000

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Thejet07 said:

I already had this fix and it didn’t work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh ok...well guess that settles that lol....any insight on what to do next then?

Z06JPB Enthusiast

Z06JPB

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

Oh ok...well guess that settles that lol....any insight on what to do next then?

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

atst2000 Enthusiast

atst2000

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Z06JPB said:

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

Ok I will call them up and ask and let them know....so guess I should just live with it?

jbith Enthusiast

jbith

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Z06JPB said:

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

There should be a 4th part as well (the stub shaft, which is supposedly the cause of the issue). I'm not sure what the part # is though.

Edited by jbith
Autocorrect error
  • Like 1
atst2000 Enthusiast

atst2000

Posted
Posted

So just curious has ANYONE had this supposed "Fix" with the bulletin that came out Aug. 5 had it actually resolve the noise?  For me the noise isn't so much a jingle per say but more or less a scraping noise like the wheel hitting against the brakes

jbith Enthusiast

jbith

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

So just curious has ANYONE had this supposed "Fix" with the bulletin that came out Aug. 5 had it actually resolve the noise?  For me the noise isn't so much a jingle per say but more or less a scraping noise like the wheel hitting against the brakes

I'm waiting in my dealer to get the parts in. Mine sounds like a wheel bearing that squeals in a repetitive cycle. Only happens when it's hot out (90+) and I've driven a while (30 minutes or more)... Guessing that combo causes something to expand. Thankfully I don't have a long drive to work so I don't have to hear it frequently.

Wheelguy Enthusiast

Wheelguy

Posted
Posted

Guys, read the line above the table listing the P/Ns. Maybe I’m mistaken but I read that as there isn’t a full list of parts yet (updated when stub shaft is available.....). I’d be pointing this out & having the dealership confirm they’re doing this correctly & have all the parts.

Wheelguy Enthusiast

Wheelguy

Posted
Posted
On 9/5/2019 at 2:57 PM, Z06JPB said:

What’s all this then?

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2018/MC-10149050-9999.pdf

 

There seemed to be a problem with SU5 and SU8 GM axles? The original date was was from August 2018. As of June 24, 2019, the restriction had been lifted so dealers can work on the axles:

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10162153-9999.pdf

 

The whole time I was under the impression the SU4 was the only axle with problems. 

Again, not an expert but that is version A of the PIP & the document was later revised lifting restrictions apparently because they confirmed the issues were only related to SU4. I’m guessing they needed all axles to see which ones were the culprit(s)?

jbith Enthusiast

jbith

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wheelguy said:

Guys, read the line above the table listing the P/Ns. Maybe I’m mistaken but I read that as there isn’t a full list of parts yet (updated when stub shaft is available.....). I’d be pointing this out & having the dealership confirm they’re doing this correctly & have all the parts.

My understanding from my dealership was that the stub shaft is a special order part currently and not generally available. Apparently there's a special process they have to go through to order it along with additional documentation that they need to send to GM.

  • Like 1
Wheelguy Enthusiast

Wheelguy

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, jbith said:

My understanding from my dealership was that the stub shaft is a special order part currently and not generally available. Apparently there's a special process they have to go through to order it along with additional documentation that they need to send to GM.

Makes sense. So that P/N is missing from the PIP attached above....so unless the stub shaft is also at the dealer.....no sense in taking it in yet (IMO). And if it’s the same revision (B - dated 05AU19) that one owner (Thejet07) has already reported not so good results, things may not be looking so good.

 

Maybe this has been discussed already & forgive me if I’m rehashing but I’d think if the 4 P/Ns from Jet’s attempted repair were known (3 in chart should be consistent) & you other guys asked your dealer to check the P/Ns currently available to them, particularly the stub shaft, then you’ll get an idea if each truck is getting the same thing. If it is all the same, then I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much that this PIP revision is the answer.

 

I hope this is clear & not introducing confusion.

atst2000 Enthusiast

atst2000

Posted
Posted

Ok so from what I’m understanding if it doesn’t include the stub shaft it’s going to be a waste taking it in?  I tried emailing my SA yesterday morning and no reply yet. I’ll call and ask. 

Wheelguy Enthusiast

Wheelguy

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

Ok so from what I’m understanding if it doesn’t include the stub shaft it’s going to be a waste taking it in?  I tried emailing my SA yesterday morning and no reply yet. I’ll call and ask. 

I would tend to think so, based on what’s shown on the PIP, starting at the bottom of page 1 & continuing on page 2. It explains the stub shaft needs to be ordered from the Warranty Parts Center using a special form & from where the dealer can obtain that form. The PIP then states the PI (Parts Information) will be updates when the stub shaft is available through CC&A (customer care & aftersales - see here for that info: https://mccicorp.com/work/gm-cca/).

 

I read all of that to mean that the stub is a special order for now & once it becomes available via what is probably the "normal" ordering process through CC&A, then the PIP will be updated so the parts list can be updated and show the stub shaft & its P/N.

 

Please, don’t take my word for it. Go over this with your advisor, service manager, shop manager or technical bulletin specialist.

Thejet07 Enthusiast

Thejet07

Posted
Posted

The stub shaft is what’s the problem. My shop manager went through this same process, got the part, same issues. He said he thought maybe the splines might be different or something like plastic embedded at the end. Nope.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Sugar Bears 2015 GMC Terrain SLE-2 2.4 AWD

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...