Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok. I’m going to go ahead and be the guinea pig and let them do the fix lol. It looks like this is the supposed fix since it dates August 5, and this was the same info that my SA had. Cross your fingers everyone!  Truck goes in Monday. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Thejet07 said:

I already had this fix and it didn’t work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh ok...well guess that settles that lol....any insight on what to do next then?

Posted
6 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

Oh ok...well guess that settles that lol....any insight on what to do next then?

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

Posted
5 minutes ago, Z06JPB said:

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

Ok I will call them up and ask and let them know....so guess I should just live with it?

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Z06JPB said:

Get the part numbers for the fix your dealer is offering first. See if they are different from the part numbers listed on the pic I posted. If they are the same, skip it.

E9E404F9-5AD5-4723-8ED3-69221DF84C6B.jpeg

There should be a 4th part as well (the stub shaft, which is supposedly the cause of the issue). I'm not sure what the part # is though.

Edited by jbith
Autocorrect error
  • Like 1
Posted

So just curious has ANYONE had this supposed "Fix" with the bulletin that came out Aug. 5 had it actually resolve the noise?  For me the noise isn't so much a jingle per say but more or less a scraping noise like the wheel hitting against the brakes

Posted
20 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

So just curious has ANYONE had this supposed "Fix" with the bulletin that came out Aug. 5 had it actually resolve the noise?  For me the noise isn't so much a jingle per say but more or less a scraping noise like the wheel hitting against the brakes

I'm waiting in my dealer to get the parts in. Mine sounds like a wheel bearing that squeals in a repetitive cycle. Only happens when it's hot out (90+) and I've driven a while (30 minutes or more)... Guessing that combo causes something to expand. Thankfully I don't have a long drive to work so I don't have to hear it frequently.

Posted

Guys, read the line above the table listing the P/Ns. Maybe I’m mistaken but I read that as there isn’t a full list of parts yet (updated when stub shaft is available.....). I’d be pointing this out & having the dealership confirm they’re doing this correctly & have all the parts.

Posted
On 9/5/2019 at 2:57 PM, Z06JPB said:

What’s all this then?

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2018/MC-10149050-9999.pdf

 

There seemed to be a problem with SU5 and SU8 GM axles? The original date was was from August 2018. As of June 24, 2019, the restriction had been lifted so dealers can work on the axles:

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10162153-9999.pdf

 

The whole time I was under the impression the SU4 was the only axle with problems. 

Again, not an expert but that is version A of the PIP & the document was later revised lifting restrictions apparently because they confirmed the issues were only related to SU4. I’m guessing they needed all axles to see which ones were the culprit(s)?

Posted
1 hour ago, Wheelguy said:

Guys, read the line above the table listing the P/Ns. Maybe I’m mistaken but I read that as there isn’t a full list of parts yet (updated when stub shaft is available.....). I’d be pointing this out & having the dealership confirm they’re doing this correctly & have all the parts.

My understanding from my dealership was that the stub shaft is a special order part currently and not generally available. Apparently there's a special process they have to go through to order it along with additional documentation that they need to send to GM.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, jbith said:

My understanding from my dealership was that the stub shaft is a special order part currently and not generally available. Apparently there's a special process they have to go through to order it along with additional documentation that they need to send to GM.

Makes sense. So that P/N is missing from the PIP attached above....so unless the stub shaft is also at the dealer.....no sense in taking it in yet (IMO). And if it’s the same revision (B - dated 05AU19) that one owner (Thejet07) has already reported not so good results, things may not be looking so good.

 

Maybe this has been discussed already & forgive me if I’m rehashing but I’d think if the 4 P/Ns from Jet’s attempted repair were known (3 in chart should be consistent) & you other guys asked your dealer to check the P/Ns currently available to them, particularly the stub shaft, then you’ll get an idea if each truck is getting the same thing. If it is all the same, then I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much that this PIP revision is the answer.

 

I hope this is clear & not introducing confusion.

Posted

Ok so from what I’m understanding if it doesn’t include the stub shaft it’s going to be a waste taking it in?  I tried emailing my SA yesterday morning and no reply yet. I’ll call and ask. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, atst2000 said:

Ok so from what I’m understanding if it doesn’t include the stub shaft it’s going to be a waste taking it in?  I tried emailing my SA yesterday morning and no reply yet. I’ll call and ask. 

I would tend to think so, based on what’s shown on the PIP, starting at the bottom of page 1 & continuing on page 2. It explains the stub shaft needs to be ordered from the Warranty Parts Center using a special form & from where the dealer can obtain that form. The PIP then states the PI (Parts Information) will be updates when the stub shaft is available through CC&A (customer care & aftersales - see here for that info: https://mccicorp.com/work/gm-cca/).

 

I read all of that to mean that the stub is a special order for now & once it becomes available via what is probably the "normal" ordering process through CC&A, then the PIP will be updated so the parts list can be updated and show the stub shaft & its P/N.

 

Please, don’t take my word for it. Go over this with your advisor, service manager, shop manager or technical bulletin specialist.

Posted

The stub shaft is what’s the problem. My shop manager went through this same process, got the part, same issues. He said he thought maybe the splines might be different or something like plastic embedded at the end. Nope.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...