Jump to content

Adding A/C to a non A/C truck

JACOB1557
 Share

Recommended Posts

JACOB1557 Enthusiast

JACOB1557

Posted
Posted

Hello everyone. I'm new to the forum. But I came here because I know I can get good info from this site. So let's get to it. I have a 1990 Chevy C1500. It didn't come with A/C. It's getting hot out. I know it's possible to add A/C. I just don't know where to start. I also know that there are under dash units that will not fit my truck. I also know that auto A/C shops can get kits for specific vehicles, however I can't find one for my exact year, make, and model anywhere. Would anyone be able to put me in the right direction for one of these kits or help me with my problem? Thanks so much, everyone. 

Screenshot_20190529-185243.png

JACOB1557 Enthusiast

JACOB1557

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Trying to do it myself. Called a local shop and they were going to charge me 3 Grand. I can't afford that. That's more than I paid for the truck. The only thing I don't understand is that the shop said that they had a kit for that model year 1990 but I can't find it, or a website for the kit anywhere. I looked on LMC and they just sell individual components. Not kits. If I go with LMC, I'd have to know what all components I'd need. 

JACOB1557 Enthusiast

JACOB1557

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also, vintage air doesn't have kits for 88-94. The latest model they have is like the 74-87 I believe. 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Doing a quick search l would go to a salvage yard and buy the under hood brackets. I would go online buy an under dash unit. Parts store for a replacement AC compressor. I would check the prices between doing my own lines or getting them made. It looks the easiest and be done for about a grand. If you do the installation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JACOB1557 Enthusiast

JACOB1557

Posted
  • Author
Posted

+KARNUT 

 

That's what I was going to do at first. But I scanned underneath there just for kicks and from what I saw the under dash unit wouldn't work unless I rip the heater parts and the floor position air vents out (the vents that point diagonally towards your feet / \). Also I'd have to cut up the middle of my dash to make it fit. Another thing is, I have a stick shift so it might make it harder and/or even get in the way. I was moreso thinking on going to scrap yard, getting some brackets and in-dash parts that control the position modes and everything and then for everything else, going brand new to ensure proper operation and reliability. 

TW97C1500 Enthusiast

TW97C1500

Posted
Posted

I don't know if you have to find a '90 or if any 88-94 will have parts that will work, but I would think you could find a junk truck with A/C for $500 or less and get all the parts you needed and swap them on to your truck.  Yeah, you might have to get a new compressor or evaporator but you would be much, much less than $3000.  Or maybe you can find a junkyard that will sell you all the stuff real cheap and not try to ask high prices for something stupid they will just scrap for 50 cents anyway.

  • 1 year later...
Yoajusto New Member

Yoajusto

Posted
Posted

Hi Jacob!

I know it's been a while, but have you made any progress with getting ac into your truck?

 

I have an 89 gmc k1500 that I need to do the same thing with. A few shops I have visited all guided me to doing the work myself. First find the correct mounting brackets for all the under-hood items, get the compressor, condensor, dryer/evaporator mounted. Then pull the dash and drop the heater box, add the condensor to the vacant spot, drill the holes in the firewall. Make sure the venting controls work of course, whether they are cable-actuated or electronic (mine are cable), so you can route the air away from the heater core and on to the condensor, and  of course so you can direct your air where you want it to go. Then just wire a toggle/on/off switch to place/mount somewhere on/under the dash to turn on the compressor/activate the clutch. At that point I would take it to a shop to have them plumb it and charge the system. 

 

It's a huge job, but doable. I hope to hear that you have done so, or something similar, with good results.

  • 2 months later...
JACOB1557 Enthusiast

JACOB1557

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/2/2021 at 12:39 PM, Yoajusto said:

Hi Jacob!

I know it's been a while, but have you made any progress with getting ac into your truck?

 

I have an 89 gmc k1500 that I need to do the same thing with. A few shops I have visited all guided me to doing the work myself. First find the correct mounting brackets for all the under-hood items, get the compressor, condensor, dryer/evaporator mounted. Then pull the dash and drop the heater box, add the condensor to the vacant spot, drill the holes in the firewall. Make sure the venting controls work of course, whether they are cable-actuated or electronic (mine are cable), so you can route the air away from the heater core and on to the condensor, and  of course so you can direct your air where you want it to go. Then just wire a toggle/on/off switch to place/mount somewhere on/under the dash to turn on the compressor/activate the clutch. At that point I would take it to a shop to have them plumb it and charge the system. 

 

It's a huge job, but doable. I hope to hear that you have done so, or something similar, with good results.

Hey! Thanks for your input. I had the same idea myself. The thing I can’t wrap my head around is that the compressor should be switching on and off intermittently. If I wired in a switch to turn the compressor on/off when I wanted AC, wouldn’t there be no way for the compressor to turn itself on/off as it should? Or does the compressor have a sensor that activates/deactivates by pressure? I’m not sure how it works, but that is my big question. As for my progress, I haven’t made any progress on the AC system yet. Im about to start getting into it again though because I want to see it done. However, this is what the truck looks like now. It was dirty in this pic but I recently gave it a comet wash to get it ready for sanding and painting here in the future. 

23F864BC-3E81-40ED-B339-07C028786479.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...