Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I ask, because I have seen it mentioned, but the TB comes already leveled... Well, I mean it has spacers in there, 2", right?

So if you level it more, are you just adding more spacers?  If I recall from doing my 2018 Z71... you only wanted to use 2" or so of spacers on those trucks, to not make the ride harsh or having to start worrying about angles of the driveshaft and stuff like that...

So you guys with TB's, are you removing the 2" spacers it comes with and adding larger suspension spacers?  Is the suspension geometry on the TB different from the prior years where you can get away with larger spacers and not have things rubbing or at bad angles where you have to worry about wearing parts out?

Posted

Trail Boss's are not leveled, they have a 2" factory lift kit, lifted front and rear. People are leveling them, there are a few threads around about it. Trail Boss trucks need a different level kit, also in threads around here someplace. 

Posted

Ok, I will see if I can find them.  I get that they are not "level" in that they lifted the front and back both by 2"...  

I guess that I mean that they lifted it the same way that we would typically "level" it... by using spacers in the front to get it even with the back.  On my 2018, I did a 2.5" level on the front and 3" blocks in the back to keep a little factory rake, so that when I put an ATV or something in the back, it would sit level and not squat like a dog taking a dump...  haha.

This is less about making the truck level and more about how one adds a little more height to the front... I know I can easily swap out the rear 2" blocks with 3" blocks or whatever... But with the front, if it already has 2" spacers in there, do those have to come out and get new ones, or...?

Posted
23 hours ago, SquireSCA said:

Ok, I will see if I can find them.  I get that they are not "level" in that they lifted the front and back both by 2"...  

I guess that I mean that they lifted it the same way that we would typically "level" it... by using spacers in the front to get it even with the back.  On my 2018, I did a 2.5" level on the front and 3" blocks in the back to keep a little factory rake, so that when I put an ATV or something in the back, it would sit level and not squat like a dog taking a dump...  haha.

This is less about making the truck level and more about how one adds a little more height to the front... I know I can easily swap out the rear 2" blocks with 3" blocks or whatever... But with the front, if it already has 2" spacers in there, do those have to come out and get new ones, or...?

I don't have a trail boss but I'm 99% sure they don't use spacers, they use a different strut, then the people who are leveling them use a spacer.

Posted
2 minutes ago, eppieguy said:

I don't have a trail boss but I'm 99% sure they don't use spacers, they use a different strut, then the people who are leveling them use a spacer.

That would be great if they use a different strut, as that means I could lift it a little more and not worry about issues...  

Posted
16 minutes ago, SquireSCA said:

That would be great if they use a different strut, as that means I could lift it a little more and not worry about issues...  

Be careful, again, I'd check the leveling companies and other threads, there is a special leveling kit for the Trailboss and CV angles are an issue.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, SquireSCA said:

That would be great if they use a different strut, as that means I could lift it a little more and not worry about issues...  

do not level a Tb!! To much stress on the ball joints. You need new control arms if you level a TB. You’ll need a kit like this

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck-2019.html

Edited by Memphis87
  • Confused 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Memphis87 said:

do not level a Tb!! To much stress on the ball joints. You need new control arms if you level a TB. You’ll need a kit like this

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck-2019.html

Why would there be to much stress on the ball joint w/ a 1.5" level kit? I have a Trail Boss and added a Rough Country level kit, and everything alinged within factory spec afterwards.  Only thing after market control arms do is give you more caster angle.  I'll give you they do have better ball joints than factory control arms, but that's not saying a leveling kit is damaging the factory control arms in any way.

Posted
Why would there be to much stress on the ball joint w/ a 1.5" level kit? I have a Trail Boss and added a Rough Country level kit, and everything alinged within factory spec afterwards.  Only thing after market control arms do is give you more caster angle.  I'll give you they do have better ball joints than factory control arms, but that's not saying a leveling kit is damaging the factory control arms in any way.


It’s essential 3” of lift in the front. No different than a 3” front kit on a stock truck accept you have longer CV shafts. Puts the angles pretty steep. I have a 3” lift on my truck now and there are tons of people on here saying that’s too high. But yet lots of people are going 3” on a trail boss without even realizing it’s the same exact scenario.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

I have the 1.5” motofab lower strut spacer on my AT4 and the cv angles don’t look bad at all. They were pretty level with the GM factory lift (longer strut) which is probably why the 1.5” space did not change much. The UCA ball joints do not look bad either. I think ReadyLift offers a replacement upper control arm to correct the ball joint angles due to them offering a 2” leveling spacer instead. The CV angles however are not corrected. The 1.5” motofab Is netting essentially a cumulative 3.5” of lift but as opposed to running a 3” spacer on a not AT4/Trailboss the CV angles and balljoints are being stretched after the 2” factory lift while standing level at the factory lifted height. A non GM lifted truck with a 3” spacer is taking the angles stretch from the full 3” height modification. I hope this makes sense.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted
I have the 1.5” motofab lower strut spacer on my AT4 and the cv angles don’t look bad at all. They were pretty level with the GM factory lift (longer strut) which is probably why the 1.5” space did not change much. The UCA ball joints do not look bad either. I think ReadyLift offers a replacement upper control arm to correct the ball joint angles due to them offering a 2” leveling spacer instead. The CV angles however are not corrected. The 1.5” motofab Is netting essentially a cumulative 3.5” of lift but as opposed to running a 3” spacer on a not AT4/Trailboss the CV angles and balljoints are being stretched after the 2” factory lift while standing level at the factory lifted height. A non GM lifted truck with a 3” spacer is taking the angles stretch from the full 3” height modification. I hope this makes sense.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


No, it doesn’t really make sense. Perhaps the geometry is slightly different making the angles a little bit better than previous models but the factory kit does not change the a-arms or drop the diff. It just adds longer cv shafts. So with that, you’re netting 3.5” of lift over a stock truck. I’d like to see what those angles look like.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

This had sparked my interest.  I have always put a RC level kit on all my silverados and badly want to put one on my TB in the Spring but I dont want to take chance of hurting factory equipment.  Like I said I want a leveling kit badly but not $500 badly as the cost of the readylift leveling kit.

Posted (edited)

The 2 inch lift the trailboss has only has a few key components,  longer struts and longer cv shafts up front are two of em. The knuckles and control arms are the same as all the other trucks. So they are already stretched 2 inches the way it sits.  To lift one taller it would need control arms for sure , that upper ball joint will hate life. The longer cvs are a plus when going taller. The rear lift is just blocks and u bolts, cheap and easy.

 

Same as a 2 inch level on a lt, custom etc will be as far as it goes b4 control arms are needed. Trail boss cv shafts would be a plus here.

Edited by Flatblack83
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...