Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Excuse me.
Just saying I don't like big wheels.
A fad I know.
SMH
:)

Just like black wheels :yuck:
Although “big” is subjective, some people may think 18s are big and a fad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t like the trend of the tires hanging out of the wheel wells. Makes no sense at all why you would want your tires sticking out into the next lane lol. Combine that with the California squat seen a few of them in NJ barf lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Jaychevy81 said:

I don’t like the trend of the tires hanging out of the wheel wells. Makes no sense at all why you would want your tires sticking out into the next lane lol. Combine that with the California squat seen a few of them in NJ barf lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I also really dislike negative offsets. Now your wheels act like a pry bar on your ball joints and hub. Not to mention your throwing rocks all over your 0.0001" thick paint. Almost every second Cummins I pass is lifted with 3/4 of the wheel out beside the truck, tow mirrors out lugging along a ghost trailer. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jimmyboy8301 said:


Just like black wheels :yuck:
Although “big” is subjective, some people may think 18s are big and a fad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm with ya on the black wheels.  Too "rattle can" looking.  I know several people around here who has taken off black wheels for polished and or chrome.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, ItsDooomz said:

I don't understand you guys knocking the 22-inch wheels. My truck looked like a Home Depot rental with the factory 18in wheels on it.

20200115_185725.jpg

Yes sir.  So much better.  '18's on my RST.  Before and after.

20190321_125126-1.jpg

20190523_170456.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, L86 All Terrain said:

I also really dislike negative offsets. Now your wheels act like a pry bar on your ball joints and hub. Not to mention your throwing rocks all over your 0.0001" thick paint. Almost every second Cummins I pass is lifted with 3/4 of the wheel out beside the truck, tow mirrors out lugging along a ghost trailer. 

Very few even attempt, let alone can pass a basic physics course.

  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/15/2020 at 6:03 PM, ItsDooomz said:

You can't tell me that doesn't look better....

20200115_185635.jpg

I certainly can.  Lowered truck on 22s, big no for me.  Smaller wheels need a more aggressive tire to look better though.  Not necessarily a MT, just not a small diameter narrow highway tire. 

 

Like I said from the very beginning ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL besides wheel diameter the small wheels ride better and offer better mpg/acceleration. My opinion is they look better too.  If you go from an 18" LT to a 20" p rated tire, that's not a relevant comparison.  

 

I'm no engineer but I do know rubber has more flex than aluminum.

Posted

I had 22s on my Silverado and now my AT4 has 20s.  I actually didn't want the 22s on the Silverado but the package came with it.  Now, after having both the 22s and 20s, I will never buy 22s on a truck again.  Too rough and hard on the truck when you are on rough roads.  I personally think 20s are a perfect balance of looks and function.

Posted
55 minutes ago, PackerChev said:

I had 22s on my Silverado and now my AT4 has 20s.  I actually didn't want the 22s on the Silverado but the package came with it.  Now, after having both the 22s and 20s, I will never buy 22s on a truck again.  Too rough and hard on the truck when you are on rough roads.  I personally think 20s are a perfect balance of looks and function.

You probably had the 45 series 22's. The '19 50 series tire type and brand tells the story. Not just 20" to 22". I've had 20''s that were harsh and rode like crap and had 20's that rode great. I've had 22" 45 series Coopers that were harsh. The 50 series Michelin 22's ride amazing. That's fact.

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, mafd2 said:

You probably had the 45 series 22's. The '19 50 series tire type and brand tells the story. Not just 20" to 22". I've had 20''s that were harsh and rode like crap and had 20's that rode great. I've had 22" 45 series Coopers that were harsh. The 50 series Michelin 22's ride amazing. That's fact.

I think the 22 Bridgestone Alenzas ride nice too. I only wish they were a little better in the snow. How are your Michelins wearing? I might switch to them when needed.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, smit303 said:

I think the 22 Bridgestone Alenzas ride nice too. I only wish they were a little better in the snow. How are your Michelins wearing? I might switch to them when needed.

I've always had Bridgestone Alenza 22's (many sets through the years) and 1 set of Cooper. This is my first set of Michelin 22's and have an exceptional ride. By far the best riding and the best 22 you will find. Wearing beautifully and balanced out perfect requiring little weight. I keep the pressure checked (especially winter months) and keep them rotated (life of the tires). They have great treadwear, traction and temp. Won't go back to Bridgestone. Can't attest to the snow.

Edited by mafd2
Posted
I certainly can.  Lowered truck on 22s, big no for me.  Smaller wheels need a more aggressive tire to look better though.  Not necessarily a MT, just not a small diameter narrow highway tire. 
 
Like I said from the very beginning ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL besides wheel diameter the small wheels ride better and offer better mpg/acceleration. My opinion is they look better too.  If you go from an 18" LT to a 20" p rated tire, that's not a relevant comparison.  
 
I'm no engineer but I do know rubber has more flex than aluminum.
I'm still dying to know how you use your truck "as a truck". Post up some pics of your awesome machine, I'd love to know what a real truck looks like. [emoji23]

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ItsDooomz said:

I'm still dying to know how you use your truck "as a truck". Post up some pics of your awesome machine, I'd love to know what a real truck looks like. emoji23.png

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

Don't get so defensive, it wasn't meant as a personal attack. It's my opinion big wheels look bad on a truck, sounds like it's yours that big tires look bad on a truck.  If you lowered your truck and put it on 22s and use it for work you're in the .1%. Most trucks with 22s are  bro'd out with a level kit and mud tire super swampers.  Not a scratch in the bed either as the owner doesn't use it. 

 

I bet you're in one of those warm states too, if you lived where the temp has 150 degree of fluctuation you're roads would be pretty bad and you may rethink those 22s. The roads I drive don't play well with that setup.  

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, mafd2 said:

You probably had the 45 series 22's. The '19 50 series tire type and brand tells the story. Not just 20" to 22". I've had 20''s that were harsh and rode like crap and had 20's that rode great. I've had 22" 45 series Coopers that were harsh. The 50 series Michelin 22's ride amazing. That's fact.

You speak the truth, there is more to it than just tire thickness. It's why I avoid LT tires on a 1/2 ton.  A good P tire far exceeds what my truck can carry and I don't drive in areas I need the puncture resistance if an LT. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,061 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...