Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Wrong wrong wrong.  [emoji14] 

GM recommends using 93 octane gasoline for its top-of-the-line 6.2-liter V-8-equipped trucks. The owner’s manual does state as low as 87 octane is acceptable for the engine. However, to achieve maximum performance and fuel economy you must use 93.
 
So with that being said- you can get by fine for a few tanks of 87.  Won't have the same performance as you would running 91 or 93 but go ahead and do it if 91/93 is not available.  (91 above 3500-4000ft is essentially the same as 93 at sea level)
 
https://pickuptrucktalk.com/2020/10/misleading-these-trucks-recommend-or-require-premium-fuel/
 
So SHUT UP and drive. 
You can't get 93 in California. Only 91.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 1/6/2021 at 12:06 PM, Transient said:

You can't get 93 in California. Only 91.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

we do have  a few 100 pumps at my local station, but price is $10/gal. but your gas milage is like 18mpg in the city and 40 mpg highway on that stuff. still not worth it. but dense hydrocarbons sure do put legs on these motors.

 

the 210 thermostat and 87 octane on a 12:1 CR motor =  sounds a bit dumb,

 

91 octane gives you a 2mpg gain over the cheap stuff. do the math  you'll see your paying more for 87 fuel /mile

 

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
we do have  a few 100 pumps at my local station, but price is $10/gal. but your gas milage is like 18mpg in the city and 40 mpg highway on that stuff. still not worth it. but dense hydrocarbons sure do put legs on these motors.
 
the 210 thermostat and 87 octane on a 12:1 CR motor =  sounds a bit dumb,
 
91 octane gives you a 2mpg gain over the cheap stuff. do the math  you'll see your paying more for 87 fuel /mile
 
I have a 6.2 and only use the premium fuel at top tier gas stations

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Ok to add a little lightness to the discussion, when that zombie apocalypse arrive, your going to want as much fuel as possible to get away!

There are aftermarket options for the diesel but fewer for the gasser and none that replace the factory tank. For gasser HD when towing and getting 8mpg x36 gallons gives a max of 288miles. Now your going to stop earlier than that so at about 250 miles of travel which is less than 4 hours of traveling. I would like to travel 6 hours a day and fill up at the end which would require a 50 gallon tank. More efficient travel. Thats my reasoning behind wanting a larger tank. I do stop every few hours but its mostly roadside to piss or eat. Pulling a large 35' rig into some stations is not always the best option so doing it once a day is preferable.

Posted

I terrine only filling up while there's sunlight. Zombies are noisy, but B-rated movies have taught me they can use the darkness to sneak up on you. At least you'll have a better chance of seeing them coming while there's sunlight. Imo, filling up right before sundown and driving all night is better than driving all day. I could be wrong, and it wouldn't be the first time. However, Hollywood can't put anything in a movie that isn't true.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 2/26/2021 at 9:59 AM, GMC4Zee said:

Ok to add a little lightness to the discussion, when that zombie apocalypse arrive, your going to want as much fuel as possible to get away!

There are aftermarket options for the diesel but fewer for the gasser and none that replace the factory tank. For gasser HD when towing and getting 8mpg x36 gallons gives a max of 288miles. Now your going to stop earlier than that so at about 250 miles of travel which is less than 4 hours of traveling. I would like to travel 6 hours a day and fill up at the end which would require a 50 gallon tank. More efficient travel. Thats my reasoning behind wanting a larger tank. I do stop every few hours but its mostly roadside to piss or eat. Pulling a large 35' rig into some stations is not always the best option so doing it once a day is preferable.

Not as nice as a bigger replacement tank underneath, but a transfer tank in the bed and you can pump to the trucks tank when stopped for a bio break. 

Posted
20 hours ago, redwngr said:

Not as nice as a bigger replacement tank underneath, but a transfer tank in the bed and you can pump to the trucks tank when stopped for a bio break. 

I wish there were a gas approved tank available for the bed.. diesel yes but not gas in my area.  Ironic that I can put five jerry cans of gas in the bed but not a tank.  I'd love to have a 30+ gallon tank with a pump or directly connected to the existing gas tank.  I wouldn't necessary fill the bed tank but would use it primarily on long trips.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...