Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at getting a crew cab Elevation in the standard box with the 5.3. I test drove this truck and it seemed like for a full size pickup, I was getting around 14-15 city and 18-21 freeway. Granted, this was only a 30 minute test drive in a brand new, non broken in motor. I’d be happy with those numbers...is this typical for this motor? 
 

I’m also debating the new ram 1500 crew cab big horn. How does this 5.3 compare to the 5.7 hemi ram as far as mpg and reliability/drivability? I haven’t test driven the ram yet but from stories I hear, some people are avg 13  mpg on the ram while others are up to 19 combined??? 

Posted

I would think you could even do

better than those numbers. 8 or 10 speed. 
 

I drove 230 miles of a mix highway at 75-80, regular roads and dirt roads with a little stop and go. Averaged 18. I have the 6.2 in a trail boss. 

Posted (edited)

Just drove 52 hours to California and back.  Mostly highway cruise control at 81-83 mph and got 19.6 mpg in a 2020 5.3 4WD with an 8spd.  I usually drive between 70 and 75 mph on the freeway and average right at 21 mpg.  This is in Houston, Texas, so being at sea level helps I'm sure.

Edited by Gangly
Posted
24 minutes ago, AsapAT4 said:

What’s real world gas mileage difference between the 5.3 and 6.2?

 

Let's say you would get 18 mpg avg over the lifetime of your truck with the 5.3. Now lets say you would have gotten 16 instead with 6.2 (most people say it's about a 2 mpg difference, least by what I've read).


Don't just look at the small number 2 and think it's insignificant. 2 out of 18 is 11 percent. If the difference is 3 mpg then you're looking at 15 percent.

 

10 to 15 percent over lifetime of your truck is significant. 5 year ownership at $3000/year of gas = approx $3200 difference in gas between the two engines, plus the initial cost to purchase it.

Posted (edited)

I average 11.5-12.0 MPG in city with my AT4 6.2 10 speed. Which I find odd due to my 16 Denali 6.2 8 speed would get 15-16 city?? I don’t get it 

Edited by CaliDenali
Posted

It’s funny that some people say “I go easy on it and still get 12mpg”. Those people will stay deep in the gas until they get 50’ from a red light, then slam on the brakes. Others coast to it or at least get off the gas earlier and get 20 average. So for the same engine, same truck, you will see lots of variation. It really depends on your driving style. My ‘19 6.2 10 speed I can get mid-20s on the highway easily. Also, cruise isn’t the big gas saver people make it out to be, especially in hilly terrain. 
 

Oh yeah, don’t buy the Dodge. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, AsapAT4 said:

What’s real world gas mileage difference between the 5.3 and 6.2?

 

I owned a 15 6.2 3.23 and then a 16 5.3 NHT  (so not the DFM's available today)

 

Mileage was very similar, doing the same job. 

 

With both I was disappointed when a hand-calc tank average was less than 20 usmpg.   

Of course if the usage for a tankful was a different blend of city / rural 2 lane / freeway / towing then the average would change. 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

2018 Silverado 1500. 5.3 liter, 3.42 rear end, 6 speed.

58 mile round trip commute which includes everything from stop and go in traffic to 75 MPH on 15 miles of Interstate with stop and go there too (I-10 Bayway over Mobile Bay).

 

On the Chevy app it shows 22.0 MPG lifetime at 23,603 miles. 400 mile average shows 24.3 this morning. I don't bother to hand calculate. 

Posted

I have a 2019 AT4 with 6.2 - I get 13-15 around town and 15-18 on the road.  I have averaged 14.6 mpg since the start (through 6,500 miles).  I have 2" level up front (still have stock 275/65/18 Duratrak's) - raising the front further, which probably hurts me on mileage on the road. 

 

No question if you are in the gas a lot, mileage will go down quickly.  I have never seen a tank over 18 mpg in the 6,500 miles I have on my truck, but have seen it for 50 miles sections here and there on the road.  I suspect if I drove for mileage I could add a 2-3 mpg to my stats, but the 6.2 is so fun to jump on, you just have to do it now and then!  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Whistlingwings said:

How do you know on the Sierra if you’re getting the 8 or 10 speed? (In the 5.3)

2019 5.3's have the 8 speed. 

Posted

If you want the best fuel economy then get a truck with the V-6, otherwise it is not worth giving much thought. Add up all your costs for owning and operating a truck including purchase price, financing costs, tires, oil changes, insurance, accessories purchased, and repairs (tires, fuel pump, water pump, radiator, batteries) and parts, and then compare that to the amount you spend in a year on gasoline.

 

I read about guys buying the top of the line model with all the extra packages and chrome and paying an extra $10,000 as a result for their "truck". That $10,000 would cover their fuel costs for 60,000 miles of driving. Focus on the purchase price, including financing, and don't worry about the miles per gallon that is possible.

 

It is nearly impossible to get less than 40 miles per gallon with a Toyota Prius and most owners reports better than 45 miles per gallon but there are competitive owners who want bragging rights for high numbers and with careful legal driving get more than 60 miles per gallon with these same cars.

Posted

I had a 2017 5.3 and your numbers sound right. Lifetime was like 17mpg. I have a roughly 50:50 city/highway commute and live in a cold climate so I warned it up in the winter.

But yea, your 15 minute test drive was pretty indicative of the 5.3 fuel efficiency.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 907 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...