Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings ya'll, I've had my 2020 RST/Z71 6.2/10 for just over a month. I have 1200 miles on it and to date it's been a rock. I'm coming from a 2015 5.3 with AFM. So far the DFM is pretty smooth and I really can't tell if and when it kicks in. I typically drive the truck in "Sport" mode to get the better response. MPG is not a big concern to me.  I purchased a "Range" device that is label "AFM Disabler" but per their website also disables DFM.

 

Does anyone have one of these installed and have any feedback on it. I'm kind of hesitant to install it seeing as I can't quantify a "problem" to fix, and I always can put the shifter in "L" mode which will disable the DFM. So I'm really wondering if there is anything to gain form this, or if I should just let this engine do it's thing? 

 

Thanks in advance for any objective knowledge you can provide.

 

Pappy

 

Posted

I’ve had it for about 2 weeks now.  It’s a noticeable difference.  Definitely more responsive especially on the highway.  Truck sounds better too now that it’s always in V8...I’ve got a Borla s-type cat back and cold air intake.  It doesn’t sound like it’s drowning in water like when DFM would switch on.  However, it does amplify the decel popping/crackling due to the aftermarket exhaust.  Some people don’t like the popping/crackling so it’s worth noting.  Without the range dfm disabler, I hardly noticed the decel popping...idk maybe because DFM was enabled and it was in V4 mode?  I drive mostly city...with range I’m at 16mpg, prior I was at 17mpg.  Also, idk if it’s a byproduct or it’s secretly built in since they didn’t mention in the description is that auto stop/start is also disabled.  The button light is still emitted but the feature is disabled.  That was a nice surprise for me since I hate the auto stop/start.  I’m not sure about the other stuff they boast about like the longevity of the motor but I’ll take their word for it since it makes sense that the motor doesn’t need to work as hard.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I bought one and it worked fine until I swapped out my gauge cluster to a Denali cluster. Something in the computer doesn't like the swap. I started having problems with door locks and different things. I sent it back to Range to have it programmed again and still the same problems. They are taking it back and giving me a refund on it. Like I said, it worked great until I swapped out the gauge cluster. These trucks are very sensitive when it comes to the computer.

Posted

Recently picked up a 2020 RST 6.2 / 10 Speed...coming from a 2007 4.8L Silverado (that is still going). From researching I didn't like anything about the AFM/DFM and looked into the Range DFM Disabler.  Ordered one directly from Range and "tried" to confirm with tech support that it would work on the 10 speed.  One tech hung up on me and the other told me it wouldn't work on the ten speed and pretty much hung up me after.  My last ditch effort was to complain on their Instagram page and I received a response within 20 minutes.  The rep wrote me and said he confirmed with tech support that they have a small percentage of units where 10 speed owners had issues but, for most it worked fine.  That was good enough for me and I plugged it in.  Have around 600 miles on it and there is no issues.  When it's not plugged in (installed AMP steps and need a splitter now) I can feel there is hesitation when launching and when stopping as well.  When it's plugged in it goes away and runs fine.  Unless there is an issue down the road I'll leave it plugged in forever.  Not easy to find current information about this, would recommend members order directly from Range.  With Amazon your not really sure how old these things are.     

Posted

Works on my 6.2/10 speed fine.


Ryan B.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I've had my Range DFM disabler for a week now.  In mostly in-town driving, but with some expressway driving in DFW, I've noticed a massive difference in feel, response, throttle, and even transmission consistency.  I've got a 5.3L with 8-speed, and I finally feel that it's being used for why I bought it. It's noticeably smoother as well. So far, there have not been any hiccups or issues, and the mileage loss is barely noticeable for me (thus far, at least).  

 

It's like I have a whole new truck, and as an added bonus, I no longer have to hit the Start/Stop button when I start up my truck.  5/5 so far!

Posted

I have the 5.3L/8 speed combo on a 2019 Sierra and I've had my Range device installed for about a week now and I'm pleased with it. I never really noticed the DFM doing it's thing until I propped open the exhaust flapper valve and covered the tailpipe resonator screens. I'm still planning on further modifying the exhaust but that's another discussion. The change in sound is what prompted me to try out the device but I do also notice slightly better throttle response. My commute is about 1/3 secondary roads and 2/3 highway and I've seen about 1 MPG loss overall. Others have mentioned some hard shifts when using the device but that hasn't been my experience at all. 

Posted
On 7/21/2020 at 8:49 PM, RyanbabZ71 said:

Works on my 6.2/10 speed fine.


Ryan B.

Can you check the firmware version on yours? TIA

 

Question
What Version do I have?
Answer
Modules manufactured after mid-2015 (version 7.1 and later) will blink a distinctive light pattern when plugged in (or waking from sleep).
 
  1. First you'll see all of the LEDs cycle in sequence as it runs it's internal diagnostics and transitions to operational status.
  2. You'll see LED #4 (far left LED when plugged into the OBD2 port) BLINK the major Version number.
  3. You'll see LED #3 (2nd from the left LED) BLINK the minor Version number.

EXAMPLE:
Version 8.1 would blink LED #4 EIGHT (8) times with a small pause and then LED #3 ONE (1) time for 8 point 1.
NOTE: You will NOT see this pattern on early modules (Version 7 and earlier) and if this is the case, you should send the module to us for updating.
Posted

I added the Range DFM disabler to my 2020 Sierra 5.3, 10 speed, 4x4. I had previously added a GM Performance CAI and Borla S-type exhaust. The exhaust just sounded strange when the dfm kicked in, so I got the disabler. The truck sounds alot better now, but my mpg dropped from 22 to 19 with the disabler.

Posted (edited)

So what is the real answer here?  Does this or does this not work on 2020 6.2L 10 speed trucks?

 

-Eli

Edited by Tjeli
Posted
So what is the real answer here?  Does this or does this not work on 2020 6.2L 10 speed trucks?
 
-Eli


Works on some range says 50/50. Mine works fine [emoji16]


Ryan B.
Posted

I guess the real question is what happens when it doesn't work like it should? What are the negative outcomes? Has anybody tried that it didn't go well? Exactly what is it that makes it not compatible?   

Posted
I guess the real question is what happens when it doesn't work like it should? What are the negative outcomes? Has anybody tried that it didn't go well? Exactly what is it that makes it not compatible?   

 

Range stated to me when I called they have seen the RPMs jump around while cruising and auto/start stop doesn’t work.

 

 

Ryan B.

Posted

On the DFM website it states not compatible with 2019+ 6.2 with 10 Spd. I own 2020 AT4 with 5.3 10spd, and was interested in this disabler a few months ago, I went to the website and tried the "will this fit your vehicle" and when I put vehicle info in and got to the transmission selection  there was no 10 Spd listed as an option to enter. I just went back to site today and 5.3 10spd is now listed as a fit. So it appears the problem regarding fitment is the 6.2 and not the 10spd. I would have thought the 10spd would have been the fitment issue not the engine size. Any 5.3 10spd guys out there running this disabler without any issues ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 559 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...