Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anybody else wonder if they should turn their truck back in to GM or am I alone on this?? I’ve had my 2020 Silverado for about 3 months, and I’ve had so many issues with lights and warnings all over my dash popping up, and most of my days off  are spent at the service center! I did NOT buy a new car to only spend my days worrying about its reliability and safety, and also to waste all my free time at the dealership. Is anybody else feeling this way??   I’m thinking I got a lemon from the start! What I’m supposed to do now- I don’t know...

Posted

I've gone through the process on another vehicle and it sucks. You need to check your states laws first though and see what the requirements are. The problem you may run into is that your vehicle has to have a certain amount of failed attempts to repair the same issue and/or be in service continuously for a certain amount of time within a certain time period.

If you are having a lot of unrelated, different issues as I have with mine, that makes it more difficult and you may not qualify. It also depends what the issues are, some things that are just annoyances and should work on a brand new vehicle will not meet the criteria as they don't necessarily impede the operation of the vehicle.

When I went through it, took about 4 months and I had had major, consistent issues with my vehicle that kept it from even being started or were a safety hazard.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, Sntos20RST said:

Does anybody else wonder if they should turn their truck back in to GM or am I alone on this?? I’ve had my 2020 Silverado for about 3 months, and I’ve had so many issues with lights and warnings all over my dash popping up, and most of my days off  are spent at the service center! I did NOT buy a new car to only spend my days worrying about its reliability and safety, and also to waste all my free time at the dealership. Is anybody else feeling this way??   I’m thinking I got a lemon from the start! What I’m supposed to do now- I don’t know...

Once you sign on the dotted line it is yours, some check engine lights and random annoyances will not be enough to get a buy back IMO but you can try. I understand your frustration but it is as simple as this, if buy backs were easy everyone would do it. You will need well documented issues that continue to occur regardless of how many attempts the dealer try's to fix it and even then jumping through hoops will be a common theme to get a buy back.

Posted

If you guys aren't happy in your trucks for whatever reason, there's no sense in trying to keep it. Either try to sell it on or if you can lemon law it for issues then start that process.

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

I just bought a 2020 Tundra TRD off road! Still got my 2008 Sierra Vortec max, but would never buy another current GM. 

 

https://www.crowntoyota.ca/inventory/new-2020-toyota-tundra-4wd-sr5-awd-pickup-truck-in-winnipeg-mb-5tfdy5f14lx938036

The Tundra loses me with the pre-2010 interior design, without a doubt the most dated interior imo on the market for both cars and trucks. Would be a great truck if Toyota still cared about it, and gave it even just a little love.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

The Tundra loses me with the pre-2010 interior design, without a doubt the most dated interior imo on the market for both cars and trucks. Would be a great truck if Toyota still cared about it, and gave it even just a little love.

I wasnt asking for your opinion. The truck has everything one needs, and is the most comfortable.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

I wasnt asking for your opinion. The truck has everything one needs, and is the most comfortable.

And i wasn't asking for you to respond!?

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah the current Silverado/Sierra aint much better either.  Professional grade ain't so great and Like a Rock is.. well an anchor because it can't get going. 

Posted



I understand your frustration but it is as simple as this, if buy backs were easy everyone would do it.


The problem with the current laws, in my opinion, is it is too difficult to win a lemon law case. I get that it isn't right for everyone to be trying to get buybacks, but the problem is that there a numerous issues, often without fixes that people basically have to live with or sell the vehicle at a loss.

I can't really think of any other piece of equipment that I would be ok keeping and be unable to return if some of the features didn't work and were unable to be repaired.

If the laws required the manufacturer to do more buybacks for basically anything they were unable to fix, they would either drastically improve their quality control or go out of business.

If these problems were universal to all manufacturers, maybe it would be a little different, but when my wife's Mazda, which costs 20k less and has more technology in it than my Denali works perfectly all the time, it isn't right that other manufacturers get away with shoddy products. We, as consumers, shouldn't accept it and the laws should be in our favor, not the companies putting out a bad product because they can.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I Lemoned my 2016 SLT Sierra . In in Ca 

Numerous issues but my steering wheel clicking was what pushed me to win my case 

They fixed it 4 different times and every time it would start to click when turning the steering wheel left and right 

The 4th time, as soon as i drove off the lot after picking it up from service started clicking right away . 

I called the BBB,. and literally after 40 days , i had my down , and 14 months of payments in my hand 

GM did call me and try to low ball me with some bogus offers which i declined ,

 

Posted





The problem with the current laws, in my opinion, is it is too difficult to win a lemon law case. I get that it isn't right for everyone to be trying to get buybacks, but the problem is that there a numerous issues, often without fixes that people basically have to live with or sell the vehicle at a loss.

I can't really think of any other piece of equipment that I would be ok keeping and be unable to return if some of the features didn't work and were unable to be repaired.

If the laws required the manufacturer to do more buybacks for basically anything they were unable to fix, they would either drastically improve their quality control or go out of business.

If these problems were universal to all manufacturers, maybe it would be a little different, but when my wife's Mazda, which costs 20k less and has more technology in it than my Denali works perfectly all the time, it isn't right that other manufacturers get away with shoddy products. We, as consumers, shouldn't accept it and the laws should be in our favor, not the companies putting out a bad product because they can.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


I agree completely. I really don’t think it should just be drivability and safety that would warrant a buy back. Today, we buy vehicles based of features and options available, idk what OP is having issues with, but if his lane keep assist isn’t working for example and the dealership has done things to correct the issue but fails.. that isn’t the customers fault. He bought a product that isn’t working as advertised/intended and GM should eat the cost. Just like something you buy on amazon that you return for not working. I do know people would take advantage of this, which is why it probably is the way it is. However, things have changed in the last decade and the buyback/lemon laws should be updated according.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...