Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Prices will for sure go up...Looking at fully loaded Ram and F150 Limited models , both are almost mid 70s. 

A loaded ( non accessory) Denali/HC right now is around 68/69k , so Gm has room to play . They know this and so with new/more options the price will surely break 70k on the 22 models I would think 

 

Posted

Not too much room really. Current High Country and Denali have been widely criticized in media as a rip off for what you get, so at least some of the upgrades should be coming out of their profit margins. Because even if they overcompensate and add everything anyone could ever ask for, they can’t tack on a 10 grand MSRP increase and expect good results. Especially if they still want buyers coming back every 3-5 years instead of every 7-10. 

Posted (edited)

I find it interesting to read all the discussion and complaints about the interior finish.  This is my first truck and I've had four German SUV's since 2008.  The fit and finish and technology in my 2020 Denali is every bit as good as any vehicle I've had. 

Edited by LowCountryDenali
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, blckblt said:

IMO that would be terrible.

I agree. And may make me say to hell with the new interior and buy a 2021.

 

Supposedly GM makes a big deal about listening to their customers and giving us what we want, looks like the end of that and they tell us what we need! How long before the whole dash is just one big video screen and we all charge up every 200 miles while having a $15.00 coffee at Starbucks. 

Edited by Likarok
Posted
1 hour ago, LowCountryDenali said:

I find it interesting to read all the discussion and complaints about the interior finish.  This is my first truck and I've had four German SUV's since 2008.  The fit and finish and technology in my 2020 Denali is every bit as good as any vehicle I've had. 

I have to agree. Even upgrading from a K1, the fit and finish and materials are noticeably better. I truly don't understand what the journalists are complaining about. I agree that the packaging is odd and makes things appear cheaper, i.e. the infotainment screen which is perfectly acceptable but looks smaller the way they positioned it. But everything is solid and it's very quiet. I've been in the new Ram interior, for example, and I honestly don't see what's so much better about it...

28 minutes ago, Likarok said:

I agree. And may make me say to hell with the new interior and buy a 2021.

 

Supposedly GM makes a big deal about listening to their customers and giving us what they want, looks like the end of that and they tell us what we need! How long before the whole dash is just one big video screen and we all charge up every 200 miles while having a $15.00 coffee at Starbucks. 

Looks like that's the direction we're heading. If you see the 2021 Escalade or the new S-class, it's very telling. I wouldn't mind it so much if most of today's screens didn't look so out of place. So many interiors looked like they were designed completely and then they thought, "Whoops, forgot the screen. Let's just stick it here." 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s mainly the small details they screwed up, but it all adds up. The little vent pieces in front of the dash speaker grills fit terrible and stick up. The console plastic has uneven gaps and sharp edges. The lower half of the door panels are very cheap looking with basic plastic speaker grills. They couldn’t even bother to put bright metal trim around them like the K2 had.
 

Also, the amount of blank switches in the lower trims is outrageous. And even with every single option, every truck has a giant blank at eye level in the center of the infotainment buttons...where they clearly had intended an eject button for a disc drive. A disc drive that was deleted anyway. 
 

I love my truck and like the interior just fine, but I can see why it gets some hate. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'll miss the column shifter, last piece of old-school truckiness out there. I'm looking forward to the 12+" screen. I'm glad they did it like Ford and not vertical like Ram. The vertical screen just isn't my cup of tea. Super Cruise will be a nice addition as well. 

 

I do hope they give the 5.3 a boost in power. 

Posted
8 hours ago, jlong1984 said:

I do hope they give the 5.3 a boost in power. 

They really do need a boost with this engine. I have it and like it a lot, but Ford and RAM are both north of 400hp now with their 5.X liter engines. With Ford getting some wild #s out of their Powerboost engines, it’s no longer good enough for GM to rely on the 6.2L as an upsell for someone who wants a 400hp V8. 
 

It wasn’t long ago when hitting 400hp in a light duty truck V8 was a pretty big deal. War is war and GM is falling behind with their power outputs. 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, econometrics said:

They really do need a boost with this engine. I have it and like it a lot, but Ford and RAM are both north of 400hp now with their 5.X liter engines. With Ford getting some wild #s out of their Powerboost engines, it’s no longer good enough for GM to rely on the 6.2L as an upsell for someone who wants a 400hp V8. 
 

It wasn’t long ago when hitting 400hp in a light duty truck V8 was a pretty big deal. War is war and GM is falling behind with their power outputs. 

Couldn’t agree with you any more. 8 straight years of same engine output is way too long. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 10/16/2020 at 9:36 PM, OnTheReel said:

It’s mainly the small details they screwed up, but it all adds up. The little vent pieces in front of the dash speaker grills fit terrible and stick up. The console plastic has uneven gaps and sharp edges. The lower half of the door panels are very cheap looking with basic plastic speaker grills. They couldn’t even bother to put bright metal trim around them like the K2 had.
 

Also, the amount of blank switches in the lower trims is outrageous. And even with every single option, every truck has a giant blank at eye level in the center of the infotainment buttons...where they clearly had intended an eject button for a disc drive. A disc drive that was deleted anyway. 
 

I love my truck and like the interior just fine, but I can see why it gets some hate. 

I agree on the blank switches. As soon as I have time to figure out the lighting that blank area will have one of these individual switches to turn on every light at the same time. I was going with the toggle but it did not match so these Toyota ones may. 

 

FA4E4EC4-073D-43F1-9542-95DEEF3B9E55.jpeg
 

04D17B7D-9DD2-4767-870E-DD5F81B08262.jpeg

Edited by EXSlider400
  • Like 2
Posted

Love GM but I will always be the first to call them out on their short comings but the blank buttons is fairly common on a few other manufactures. I hate , it looks so cheap but its not just GM that does this.  

Posted
1 hour ago, f8l vnm said:

Love GM but I will always be the first to call them out on their short comings but the blank buttons is fairly common on a few other manufactures. I hate , it looks so cheap but its not just GM that does this.  


but do they throw blank buttons right in the middle of the dash where there should be one. 
 

it’s very normal for other companies to do jt but they also put them down low or to the left of the steering wheel so you can add auxiliary lights. They don’t provide anything to fill in the spots in theirs. 
 

They do sell the auxiliary switches but that is something completely different. It’s awesome to pay 50-60k for a GM truck and have a blank plastic button right in the middle of the dash. It would be a great spot for the home button and then add something where the home button is. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, spizike9 said:


but do they throw blank buttons right in the middle of the dash where there should be one. 
 

it’s very normal for other companies to do jt but they also put them down low or to the left of the steering wheel so you can add auxiliary lights. They don’t provide anything to fill in the spots in theirs. 
 

They do sell the auxiliary switches but that is something completely different. It’s awesome to pay 50-60k for a GM truck and have a blank plastic button right in the middle of the dash. It would be a great spot for the home button and then add something where the home button is. 

Cant say I disagree with you mate . frustrating

Posted

They stepped way backward from the K2 as far as blanks. The accessory switch arrangement is totally whacko. The lesser equipped K2s just used larger buttons to make up the space. T1s, you get very obvious blanks instead.

 

Same can be said for the trailer brake and 120v outlet panels. K2 had different pieces of trim for trucks with, and without those options so it wasn’t so obvious something was missing. Here you get nice big blank panels that literally fall into the dash if you push on them too hard. Silliness.

Posted
8 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

They stepped way backward from the K2 as far as blanks. The accessory switch arrangement is totally whacko. The lesser equipped K2s just used larger buttons to make up the space. T1s, you get very obvious blanks instead.

 

Same can be said for the trailer brake and 120v outlet panels. K2 had different pieces of trim for trucks with, and without those options so it wasn’t so obvious something was missing. Here you get nice big blank panels that literally fall into the dash if you push on them too hard. Silliness.

Something tells me it has something to do with Money and it being cheaper! :)  Just a hunch! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 369 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...