Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

With reports popping up left and right about rust issues with the newly redesigned F-150s, made me wonder if any of you are getting any surface rust underneath your pickup. I remember my 2004, 2015, 2016 Silverado’s/Sierras all had surface rust, mainly on the steel frame, so nothing really to worry about. My 2020 seems to be holding up much better. 
 

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/amp35726969/2021-ford-f-150-pickups-rust-reported/

Posted

There was an article in some of the newspapers that Ford made several hundred trucks 2021s and parked them at the airport in Detroit. These trucks were brand new but needed updated software. Ford decided to get a jump on production before all of their testing was done. So these trucks were built and parked till they got around to updating them. I'm sure they were not stored in the most hospitable place either. Which probably is leading to the rust issue.

Posted

Undercarriage / drivetrain rust.

 

2021 Ford

 

Other brands

 

Posted

They still make the F-150?  Anyway what year because I can't tell the difference in their new one vs the current.  I thought GM was the quintessential  boring same ol, same ol, crease here, flare there?  

  • Haha 3
Posted

I think i seen this guy's video on youtube, is it the guy talking about surface rust on the rear differential, exhaust hangers and parts, non stainless i might add. If you want it to look factory fresh it requires some effort and of course cash. He also lives in a rust belt state but sorry imo you are beyond nit picking if you complain about exhaust hangers showing signs of rust. It's called fluid film, and also a lot of elbow grease and time to keep things clean, either do it or stop complaining about something that is well out of fords or any manufactures control.

Posted

He’s nitpicking for sure. But to be fair, after 3 winters in salt my diff and exhaust hangers don’t even look like that. And I’ve never painted or undercoated them. I’d probably be a little annoyed too. 

370519B1-9CC4-4F34-8860-D4DED146D3B5.thumb.jpeg.691ca3ace196017b22855d074a32d7c1.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

It’s a Ford. Go figure!  Let it rust. Never been a fan and never will be. Too many on the wife’s side that think they are superior trucks in every way.  I haven’t seen it yet. Never been impressed. 

Posted

It's on the the rear axle. I heard the early launch vehicles didn't get any anti- corrosive coating on them as they were in a hurry to release.

Posted
1 hour ago, L87Powered said:

It's on the the rear axle. I heard the early launch vehicles didn't get any anti- corrosive coating on them as they were in a hurry to release.

I read that too.. Still embarrassing. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That should answer the maximum depth difference between the stock and the PPE so its not hugely lower. As to the PML pan, they don't make any claims that it fits the L8T with the same transmission and in fact leave their information confusing, however on the surface it says "for Duramax" and so its hard to say. I know a while back and not sure which brand it was that specifically stated that the extra capacity pan that particular company made did NOT fit the gas version. 
    • There are several versions of the 5100's. Some for stock height, some for leveled, some for lifted.    Side note. I finally had a chance to tow with my 30' gooseneck with about 10,000 lbs of material on it this past week. Hands down the 5100's made the trailer towing much more stable and comfortable. I even had 10 cmu blocks in the bed. What a difference over the stock shocks. 
    • According to PML, the stock pan is 4.3" deep - (PML info): Dimensions: at deepest area, PML pan is 7 inches, stock pan is 4.3 inches    PPE is 5.4" so roughly 1.1" deeper than stock
    • I had not realized that PPE has come out with a version of a cast aluminum oil pan specific to being able to fit onto the 10L1000 with the L8T engine sometime this spring. I was doubting that anyone would come out with something beyond what Dorman had in more of a direct factory pan swap. I see from one comment that is on the PPE site that they found the pan to be tighter to install then the factory unit and having to flex the exhaust down to fit it. I didn't lookup any specs if they have any as per how much lower it hangs but as it holds more oil and has fins outside the pan it would no doubt hang a certain amount lower.    I looked back at the site and they do have some depth measurements to get a rough comparison to the factory pan total height or hang down if you will at the front and rear of the pan so that will give a good idea how much further down this pan would end up being for ground clearance issues.    2024-2026 GM 6.6L Gas 10L1000 Heavy-Duty Cast Transmission Pan – Pacific Performance Engineering    
    • I'm in constant amazement over the number of people that do oil maintenance by how they feel, what they were told, what materials cost, what brand A claims vs brand B.     Come to think of it, this behavior isn't exclusive to oil. 🤔 They drive this way too. 😬   There is a 20 plus page thread on BITOG on Mobil 1 Advanced Clean vs Valvoline Restore and Protect it would be amusing if it were not so........humanly pitiful.   Last Sunday we were are sitting at services and listening to a speaker talk about Jesus parable of the wide and narrow gates and he said something that hadn't dawned on me but totally fit the way people in general are about just about everything. He said there are so few people on the narrow path leading to a good reward not because the the narrow gate was hidden or hard to find but because the wide gate leading to a bad end it so darn easy and uncomplicated to follow!!!             
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...