Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wanted to start a thread and get a feel for order processing time on new MY2023 HD orders.  I placed my MY2023 order 3 weeks ago for a Sierra 6.6L gas truck, however order is still stuck in event 1100 - dealer submitted but not accepted yet by GMC.

 

Have any 2023 orders been officially accepted by GMC yet?  If so, what was your timeframe?  Dealer is still in the dark and the GMC.com chat only can confirm it hasn't been accepted. I think due to MY changeover and the late change to have these trucks be carryover from 2022, there is a lot of uncertainty still (even pricing).

 

Appreciate any feedback other buyers can share!

Posted
59 minutes ago, Moe19733 said:

I placed mine about 5 weeks ago, same deal for me. I was told 8 - 12 months.

wow 8-12 months?!  Was yours a '22 order that was changed to a '23, or was yours a '23 all along?

Posted
55 minutes ago, djriv11 said:

wow 8-12 months?!  Was yours a '22 order that was changed to a '23, or was yours a '23 all along?

No way is it 8-12 months.  He must have meant weeks

Posted

It was a '22 order, they told me most likely would not make it by the '22 deadline. He was clear 8 - 12 months. Also, told me he has orders from December that still haven't been built.

Posted
On 6/28/2022 at 11:52 AM, CRApex said:

No way is it 8-12 months.  He must have meant weeks

It took mine eleven months from order to delivery.  '22 model year.

Posted
13 hours ago, nards444 said:

8-12 weeks good luck. 

 

I knew there was a delay, pretty common knowledge, but had no idea it was that far off!  Glad I'm not ordering right now.

Posted

I placed my order 3 months ago...still hasn't been picked up by GM. Apparently, there are restraints on Midnight Edition, Convenience II, Leather, painted black wheels, and some other things I wanted, on a Chevy 2500 LT. Why in the hell would they have these options listed on the build site if they've been unavailable for months?

  • Like 1
Posted

I ordered in February, was told that end of May/early June they get flipped to MY23’s. I got a call this week saying my truck could be picked up at the factory if I wanted to drop the driver alert 1 and driver alert 2 packages. I’ve opted to wait for all the options I’ve chosen on my AT4. If I was to just take what’s available, I’d go pick up a dodge thats on the lot and ready for pickup today. 
i was told it could still be up to 6 more months. 
This is coming from a large dealer with multiple locations and a very large allocation with GM. Smaller dealers with smaller allocations will be longer wait times. 
 

Posted

I ordered my 2022 3500HD 6.6 gasser on November 1st 2021 and got it mid April 2022.

It was on constant constraint and i had to make package adjustments to get GM to accept it. And with all that i'm still not able to use heated/cooled seats, heated steering wheel or parking sensors because they shipped it without the chips. They will retrofit the chips at a later date...... Irritating

Posted
On 6/28/2022 at 11:52 AM, CRApex said:

No way is it 8-12 months.  He must have meant weeks

Ive been waiting 10 months for my 2022. And im still waiting

Posted
On 7/13/2022 at 6:09 PM, Camario said:

Ive been waiting 10 months for my 2022. And im still waiting

Yep.  Like I said, had know idea it was taking this long..brutal.

Posted

Ordered Aug 12th - I'm going to send a "Happy Anniversary" card to my dealership in a few weeks-  Order still not picked up by GM - Told a month ago it will be a 23' . I should be hearing it will only be 3-4 months sometime this year.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Leonardo Willi said:

Ordered Aug 12th - I'm going to send a "Happy Anniversary" card to my dealership in a few weeks-  Order still not picked up by GM - Told a month ago it will be a 23' . I should be hearing it will only be 3-4 months sometime this year.

Wow 11 months and order not accepted yet? That is crazy, but thinking it must be a dealer allocation issue?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...