Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very nice cars but if something goes wrong very expensive to fix and hard to work on.  I was thinking ZL1 either generation but perfer 6 gen since I know the egine well from this damn truck.  Or V2 CTSV manual, 6gen SS and do heads, cam, pistons boost.  And C6 ZO6 with bolt ons and heads cam.

Posted
2 hours ago, pokismoki said:

 

I think these 1500's are already maxed out in stock form... you might want to start looking at a 2500 with all the upgrades youve done.  1500 just cant RELIABLY handle big wheels and power in a daily driver... all those mods put a ton of stress on the parts you upgraded too from stock..  1500 trucks are best left alone in stock form for daily drivers.   

Yeah that's just wrong lol

  • Like 1
Posted

Some very good points made. Just frustrated having to replace a transmission at 50k mies. It wouldn't be so bad if they weren't so expensive (trucks). Guess that's a sign of the times. GM asks so much more $$ for a lot less of a pickup. Just can't like the new ones. They look like juiced up Honda Ridgelines. 👎

Posted
11 hours ago, shakenfake said:

Yeah that's just wrong lol

they tend to fall apart when the screws are put them. , many components on the 1500 need  a lot of upgrades to handle more hp

Posted
9 hours ago, pokismoki said:

they tend to fall apart when the screws are put them. , many components on the 1500 need  a lot of upgrades to handle more hp

 

I see ya have a bone to chew on here. 🤣

 

One of the things that made the 239 Flathead Ford indestructible was the inherent designs lack of breathing and ability to make compression. A little over a 3/4 horse per cubic inch in a really hot rodded motor. There are a few guys today getting closer to 1 hp/cid today and still stone axe reliable motors. 

 

Somewhere between million mile bone stock flatheads and 3 hp/cid NHRA Pro Stock motors that wouldn't go 30K in a street car is everything else not Koenigsegg with reliability to match power density and current states of the common arts. 

 

Ya gotta hand it to GM sometimes. The ECOTEC3 4.3 is duel fuel motor of 262 CID that stock at the flywheel is 287 hp on regular and over 300 as a tippler. Power density of mid 60's muscle cars with the reliability to meet the 200-250K expectations of most drivers today. Amazing!

 

That said they do not have allot of cushion built in because?  I got used up already. The nature of materials has not changed as fast as power density demands have. Today they are asking motors sized for a motorcycle to propel 1/2 tone trucks. But 8620 nickel gear steel is still the same. 

 

It really is helpful to have a touchstone of reference for such discussions. 

 

How many guys slapping turbos or blowers on a 5.3 take the motor down to increase the ring gap? Built into the cake with Detroit does it. But guys don't and break the thing and call it junk or weak. Pretty sure what is weak is the thinking behind the build and it's expectations. 

 

Please feel free to disagree.... 😉 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, pokismoki said:

they tend to fall apart when the screws are put them. , many components on the 1500 need  a lot of upgrades to handle more hp

Other than the trans give me 3. Suspension is fine unless you are on 35s doing boosted 4x4 launches. Rear end is good for quite a bit of power. 

 

@Grumpy BearDisagree heavily with that one. It is so easy to put on a supercharger, without gapping rings, and moving on out with no issues. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

the suspension in no great shakes, under sized brakes,  too much front bias, undersized steering links (dangerous for offroading) not good if your on 35"  

rear end is good, under utilized rear disc brakes is a waste..

i got a laundery list of other issues i cant recall it all

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
6 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

 

Most tards put AMG badges on their non-AMG vehicles and here you are suggesting to debadge a legit AMG?  Insanity.

more fun when you de-badge a hot rod, and re-badge it as the  Base model with base model rims and tires... thats when the insanity begins,  and the tears start rolling

Posted
9 hours ago, pokismoki said:

more fun when you de-badge a hot rod, and re-badge it as the  Base model with base model rims and tires... thats when the insanity begins,  and the tears start rolling

If I had the desire to have a overly modified factory performance car again say like a hellcat. My first project would be to make it look like the V-6 version. Badging, wheels, wings everything. I only want to amuse myself. Not be a hey take me invitation every time I drive it. Have I done that before, yup.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

If I had the desire to have a overly modified factory performance car again say like a hellcat. My first project would be to make it look like the V-6 version. Badging, wheels, wings everything. I only want to amuse myself. Not be a hey take me invitation every time I drive it. Have I done that before, yup.

In my day that is what we called a "sleeper".  :)

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

2014 SLT, original owner. Had my first "real" problem last week, dealer had to replace the HVAC servo for driver side temp control. Otherwise just a few nickel and dime issues not worth mentioning. "But...but...but.... you should never buy a first year model change, too many bugs need to be worked out". Well I guess I got one of the good ones then. I have to confess, it only has 61,000 miles, lol!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...