Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone use regular gas in their truck, if so what effect does it have? 

Posted
42 minutes ago, wenlund said:

Does anyone use regular gas in their truck, if so what effect does it have? 

Best case... Slight loss of power and decrease in fuel economy.  Worst case misfire.  Never tried it in my 20.... My 07 with a 6.2 hated anything but premium.

Posted

I've started blending. I usually fill up around a half tank all the time so now I will alternate between 93 and 87. If for some reason I run to a quarter tank or even below I'll fiil with 93. 

Posted
7 hours ago, wenlund said:

Does anyone use regular gas in their truck, if so what effect does it have? 

 

 

93 or bust.  6.2 does not like anything less.  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The engine is tuned/set up the to run on 91 octane. 93 is fine but not required..or spec'd in the manual. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

The engine is tuned/set up the to run on 91 octane. 93 is fine but not required..or spec'd in the manual. 

This is because 93 octane is not readily available out west.  Most stations around me have 87/89/93 octane at the pump.  A couple have 87/89/91/93.  The 91 is usually less than $.10 difference, so I just use the 93.

Posted

Colorado 85/87/91 oct. 30+ cents a gallon for 87, 55-60 cents plus for premium.

Posted

With the exception of my current ride I tuned my trucks to run on premium for more performance. Paying extra for the 6.2 then putting regular gas in doesn’t compute in my little brain. I’ve heard on some car related programs that running regular gas in premium tuned engines causes no harm. They’ll just detune. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 9/30/2023 at 9:08 AM, wenlund said:

Does anyone use regular gas in their truck, if so what effect does it have? 

 

It'll pull timing so it doesn't knock (or at least to try and reduce the knock) --  which makes it unable to make the power you paid all the extra money to get. 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, CASEY7777 said:

Tried 87 and 93 octane, not hauling heavy loads. I get the same gas mileage with 87 or 91 octane.

 

Octane rating has nothing to do with the amount of 'energy per gallon'. 

 

Only with how it burns . 

 

 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...