Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

no 100% sure what block i have. 90,000 on the clock 5.3 flex fuel. i use whatever fully synthetic oil autozone is running a special on that week. change it about every 5 to 6 thousand miles. usually she's about a quart low at the 5k mark. its been like that since the first time i changed the oil. i bought the truck new and about 90% of the miles are interstate commute to work miles so it has not been abused.

Posted

Well its almost time for another oil change. Will be hittin 75k soon. I still can't get a good answer out of anyone as to whats happening to the oil? Since I bought the truck used, I have put 9 qts. of extra oil in 25k. Seems the truck is lagging a little in power now. Does the dealer have a way to check for diminished exhaust flow? I have always been told clogged cats will burn the valves.

Posted

So will disabling the AFM void the warranty with GM?

 

I have a 2009 Chevrolet Z71 with the 5.3 and AFM.

Posted

I have a 2007 Chevy Tahoe with 91k and never really noticed that burned that much oil. But this one week I put 1200 miles on it all highway and low oil light\message came up. Since then I had the oil change and started an oil comp. test. 3000 1qt is gone. So if I disable AFM will my issue go away or is the damage already done? Love the truck just not this oil deal. I talk to my dealer and they said they are only see this in higher mileage 07 that are highway driven. Thoughts?

Posted
I have a 2007 Chevy Tahoe with 91k and never really noticed that burned that much oil. But this one week I put 1200 miles on it all highway and low oil light\message came up. Since then I had the oil change and started an oil comp. test. 3000 1qt is gone. So if I disable AFM will my issue go away or is the damage already done? Love the truck just not this oil deal. I talk to my dealer and they said they are only see this in higher mileage 07 that are highway driven. Thoughts?

 

So is the AFM the root cause of all of the oil burning/loss woes???

 

I had 2 previous 5.3 both NON-AFM engines, what the heck changed??????

Posted

After a long talk they have agreed to replace the engine. My last truck was an 02 silver ado with 250k that maybe burnt a half quart at 5000 miles acceptable.they also didn't want to admit the reason booth catalytic converters and 02 sensors were from the oil burning needless to say there getting replaced too. Thanks

 

 

Wow... kinda hope I dont end up there... or if I do, its in the next 6 months before my powertrain warr runs out :nonod:

Posted
After a long talk they have agreed to replace the engine. My last truck was an 02 silver ado with 250k that maybe burnt a half quart at 5000 miles acceptable.they also didn't want to admit the reason booth catalytic converters and 02 sensors were from the oil burning needless to say there getting replaced too. Thanks
Wow... kinda hope I dont end up there... or if I do, its in the next 6 months before my powertrain warr runs out :nonod:

 

 

I had an 2003 with 225,000 miles and never had any engine problems, my 2009 is 1/2 the truck in build quaility.

 

I am going to find a clean late model 2000-2006 model and ditch the 2009.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Glad i found t his forum.....So i crank up the truck a few days ago and i see a huge puff of white smoke...never seen b4, then while driving i hear the clatter sound. Get home and sure enough, very little oil on dipstick! No warning what so ever on the display, and the dic showed 35% in the oil change deal. So i added 3 qts.

Have 102,000 miles, 2008 5.3L AFM, driving about 70 miles Daily.

 

Does anyone know what the oil pressure should be reading???

Posted

 

Does anyone know what the oil pressure should be reading???

 

 

I myself have wondered what the oil pressure should be reading as mine jumps around. I seem to have to put anywhere from .5-1. qt. of oil in my 07 at about 30% left on the DIC.

Posted

Glad i found t his forum.....So i crank up the truck a few days ago and i see a huge puff of white smoke...never seen b4, then while driving i hear the clatter sound. Get home and sure enough, very little oil on dipstick! No warning what so ever on the display, and the dic showed 35% in the oil change deal. So i added 3 qts.

Have 102,000 miles, 2008 5.3L AFM, driving about 70 miles Daily.

 

Does anyone know what the oil pressure should be reading???

 

 

Mine is around 40 at idle, 50 at steady speed, and 60 while accelerating.

Posted

Great Forum Guys,

 

So I have a 2008 Chevy Suburban Z71 with the 5.3 in it..~ 49,500 Miles on it..

 

Owned since new.. Syntethic oil at every change ~ 5000 miles as recommended..

 

Just before going on a weekend Ski trip I checked my oil level and I was 1.5 qts low..

 

So I topped it off and went on our Ski trip ~ 600 Miles later I checked the oil level and I was .5 qts low...

 

At that rate I am at the 2 qts or better every 2400 miles..That is un believable to me..

 

I have also noticed during cold starts especially when sitting for a few days that I hear what

sounds like lifter tick and or piston slap during warm up.. 2 min or more..

 

Oddly enough my neighbors 2008 Yukon XL is in the shop getting piston & rings replaced she has 60k on hers.

 

I have a couple of questions for our dear forum members..

 

1) Why is there not a complete recall on this Issue based on the number of cases?

2) Has anyone checked into Class Action regarding this issue?

3) How About E.P.A study / Polution probability..?

4) What is this doing to my Catalytic Converters / O2 sensors?

 

My 99 Suburban @ 120K did not use a drop of oil and neither did my 93 Sierra...@ 125K

 

I am a loyal GM customer and Multi-GM car owner.. This is unacceptable.. No one has the time to stop at the dealer every 500 miles for months on end!

 

I am not a fan of Engine Surgery at 50,000 miles.. Unless my warranty is reset to 0 miles..

 

For those in the Metro Detroit area who have had this resolved, can someone respond with a dealer suggestion?

 

Thanks!

 

Cpt Ahab ;)

  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished my first "official" oil consumption test through the local dealer. They reported that my truck consumed 1.5 qts of oil over the test interval as opposed to the .5-1 qt I've measured. (In all honesty I did drive more during February than I have over the last 12 months, but it was mostly highway mileage back and forth to western Ohio.) To make a long story short the Service Manager recognized the "validity" of my concern over the oil consumption, but said his hands were tied as the amount of oil used was "acceptable" to GM.

Posted

1) Why is there not a complete recall on this Issue based on the number of cases?

2) Has anyone checked into Class Action regarding this issue?

3) How About E.P.A study / Polution probability..?

4) What is this doing to my Catalytic Converters / O2 sensors?

 

 

1) It is evident that GM doesn't intend to recall vountarily. All of us could file a compaint to the NHTSA but I think it has to be a safety issue. I searched there and found only 1 complaint about the consumption issue. All that are using oil here should file a compaint, it might do something.

http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/recalls/

2) Has been suggested in posts here but nothing has come of it.

3) This one may be the best option, since all this oil has to be causing pollution.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/recall.htm

4) I've asked the same question here, and at the dealer. No answer yet.

Posted (edited)

2008 extended cab with 5.3. 71000 miles. Bought it new in May of '08. Haven't noticed that it's burning any oil and I do all my own maintenance. If it's using any oil it is very little.

 

My son is still driving a 1999 extended cab with 4.8 that I bought back in Oct. 1998. It has ~250000 miles on it. It's not using much, if any, oil either.

 

 

I use Pennzoil full synthetic.

Edited by David_L6
Posted

Hey guys I have a Sierra 4.8 only has 13000 miles on it obviously not afm, any how Its not using up any oil, but I was reading through everything and I noticed a lot of you are noticing oil consumption after like 5000 miles or about .5 of a quart around 3000 miles which should still put you in between the cross hatch (still safe) why wouldnt you guys just change your oil every 3000 miles and forget about the Olm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...