Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
what were you going to do in Lancaster?


There isn’t anything to do in Lancaster


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted

Took the family to chruch this morning.  Daughter took off after church with one of her friends to lunch and go shopping.  Wife, son, and I went to brunch in Cal City, look at a furniture store in Mojave, grab some groceries, and drove home, crossing the 1,000 mile mark just south of Mojave.  

19 hours ago, Colossus said:

what were you going to do in Lancaster?

Went to get the letter from my Dr with my work limitations, which my managers will need tomorrow at work.

19 hours ago, Chris said:

 


There isn’t anything to do in Lancaster


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Nothing to do?  Except for doctors and some shopping, nothing until April.  

Posted
Took the family to chruch this morning.  Daughter took off after church with one of her friends to lunch and go shopping.  Wife, son, and I went to brunch in Cal City, look at a furniture store in Mojave, grab some groceries, and drove home, crossing the 1,000 mile mark just south of Mojave.  
Nothing to do?  Except for doctors and some shopping, nothing until April.  


What’s in April? I haven’t found anything decent to do in Lancaster/Palmdale. That’s why I’m buying my house in Bakersfield. That and I need to stay in Kern for my CCW


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
12 minutes ago, Chris said:

 


What’s in April? I haven’t found anything decent to do in Lancaster/Palmdale. That’s why I’m buying my house in Bakersfield. That and I need to stay in Kern for my CCW


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

JETHAWKS!!!!  I’m staying in Kern, Rosamond is in Kern, close to work, and some off-road things to do.  We don’t mind driving to Bakersfield or Valencia, or Apple Valley.  We’re going to venture to Ontario and Fontana, CA in a few weeks.  In November, I’m looking at taking my brother in law, nephew, and son out to the XB-49 (south of California City) and XB-70 (northwest of Barstow) crash sites.  

  • Like 1
Posted
JETHAWKS!!!!  I’m staying in Kern, Rosamond is in Kern, close to work, and some off-road things to do.  We don’t mind driving to Bakersfield or Valencia, or Apple Valley.  We’re going to venture to Ontario and Fontana, CA in a few weeks.  In November, I’m looking at taking my brother in law, nephew, and son out to the XB-49 (south of California City) and XB-70 (northwest of Barstow) crash sites.  

We have a picture of some wrecks in the office. I don’t have an off road vehicle nor do I know how the boundaries of the base are. I hope I never have to deal with a 16 crash. Already don’t like the air start training. Hydrazine response and associated maintenance sucks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chris said:


We have a picture of some wrecks in the office. I don’t have an off road vehicle nor do I know how the boundaries of the base are. I hope I never have to deal with a 16 crash. Already don’t like the air start training. Hydrazine response and associated maintenance sucks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Both crash sites are off base.  I’ve biked out to the XB-49 site a few times, when I lived in California City.  That I know of, only two crash sites on base, out in the AFRL area, T-38 (1997) and F-111 (unknown date).  I have a list of coordinates at work for several crash sites, all off base.  

 

Anyways, off to bed for my first DAY back at work.  O’Dark Hundred comes way too early.

Posted
Both crash sites are off base.  I’ve biked out to the XB-49 site a few times, when I lived in California City.  That I know of, only two crash sites on base, out in the AFRL area, T-38 (1997) and F-111 (unknown date).  I have a list of coordinates at work for several crash sites, all off base.  
 
Anyways, off to bed for my first DAY back at work.  O’Dark Hundred comes way too early.


I don’t have to be there til 3. So 4 hours til bed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Posted

Smiled when the Broncos loss today.. that should seal the deal for the rest of the season and people will stop talking about how good a team the Broncos are and all this yip yap crap. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Ravenkeeper said:

Both crash sites are off base.  I’ve biked out to the XB-49 site a few times, when I lived in California City.  That I know of, only two crash sites on base, out in the AFRL area, T-38 (1997) and F-111 (unknown date).  I have a list of coordinates at work for several crash sites, all off base.  

 

Anyways, off to bed for my first DAY back at work.  O’Dark Hundred comes way too early.

Post some pics of those crash sites if you can, Raven. I'm a huge aviation geek. I recall seeing a couple older crash sites up in northern CA on youtube - both were in pretty remote areas, but alot of the airframe and engines were still intact (at least, the stuff that didn't get taken over the years). Big ol' radials on those ones. :cool:

  • Like 1
Posted

3ddef91f58a16d942e09d7c38f4dff34.jpg

Changed rear brakes. The EBCs didn’t hold up for nothing

b4cdca924644eca5aa06a2ca3e8064c6.jpg

a0ac8d59605fc953600007a0e8eb45a5.jpg

Also coated the truck today

2bdf0f90177eebfb908f637045282a15.jpg

b30c7d80cf92959b8bb3a9222e2783bb.jpg


Ryan B.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

3ddef91f58a16d942e09d7c38f4dff34.jpg

Changed rear brakes. The EBCs didn’t hold up for nothing

b4cdca924644eca5aa06a2ca3e8064c6.jpg

a0ac8d59605fc953600007a0e8eb45a5.jpg

Also coated the truck today

2bdf0f90177eebfb908f637045282a15.jpg

b30c7d80cf92959b8bb3a9222e2783bb.jpg


Ryan B.

Looks like mine front one, on my ‘15, back in May.

 

5b0e1ca8e1f6c_FrontRightBrakePads.thumb.jpeg.226499ad6fbdaa2297d2c5e5bf005352.jpeg

Posted
3ddef91f58a16d942e09d7c38f4dff34.jpg

Changed rear brakes. The EBCs didn’t hold up for nothing

b4cdca924644eca5aa06a2ca3e8064c6.jpg

a0ac8d59605fc953600007a0e8eb45a5.jpg

Also coated the truck today

2bdf0f90177eebfb908f637045282a15.jpg

b30c7d80cf92959b8bb3a9222e2783bb.jpg


Ryan B.
Short life and DIRTY was my experience with them.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...