Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Idk my offset but here are my wheels, right now I'm running 305-55-20 I think, I'm not able to look since I'm out of state working lol.

d68b96970db384216caabd4255b76894.jpg4a9a4f2eca89db71db343ba099464fae.jpga06da5fd134918d0c7d4bee9bce9f852.jpg

Posted

I have a 2014 GMC Sierra all terrain with 5inch rcx lift kit , 20x10 rockstar rims with -24 offset and 305/55/20 copper zeon ltz tires , amp power step , bushwaker pocket style fended flares , boral exhaust with metal mulisha 4 inch tip ... Looking to put 1.25 rough country or 1.5 zone body lift to fit 35's

 

DFD72325-B97F-4856-8878-9A39CE53EAE4.jpg

 

 

58D6ADDD-DD0B-4295-A056-58AA3C086C7F.jpg

0B87492D-8483-4493-9835-52660D324184.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted

Does anyone think a 35" tire on the stock rim ( Not sure of the backspacing) would fit on a 4 inch lift?

 

I have a 2wd if that makes a difference.

 

 

Thanks

 

Evan

Posted

I have a 2014 GMC Sierra all terrain with 5inch rcx lift kit , 20x10 rockstar rims with -24 offset and 305/55/20 copper zeon ltz tires , amp power step , bushwaker pocket style fended flares , boral exhaust with metal mulisha 4 inch tip ... Looking to put 1.25 rough country or 1.5 zone body lift to fit 35's

 

DFD72325-B97F-4856-8878-9A39CE53EAE4.jpg

 

 

58D6ADDD-DD0B-4295-A056-58AA3C086C7F.jpg

0B87492D-8483-4493-9835-52660D324184.jpg

So what made you change rear bumper to one without steps?

 

 

My Current Setup,2014 Silverado 2LT Z71,RCX 2.5 Level Kit,NittoTerra 33x12.50R20Lt's,Fuel - Octane D509 20x9 -12 Offset,All Chrome Plasti-Diped

My Up Coming Mod's,McGhauphy's 7"-9" Economy Lift Kit,Federal Couragia M/T's 35x12.50R20Lt's,OEM Tow Mirror's,Bushwaker OE Fender Flairs,Gtr Lighting Led Conversion Kit's 2,200 Lumen(High,Low,Fog),Black Spyder Venom Bull Bar,Iron Cross HD Step's.

  • Like 1
Posted

Does anyone think a 35" tire on the stock rim ( Not sure of the backspacing) would fit on a 4 inch lift?

 

I have a 2wd if that makes a difference.

 

 

Thanks

 

Evan

 

 

Yes you can fit a 35" tire on a stock rim with the Zone Offroad lift or the BDS kit. I have seen both done and both are in this thread. The BDS lift is the 4" lift with stock 20" AT rims and a 275/65/20 BFG AT. The Zone offroad truck, 4.5" lift, has the stock chrome 20s and Cooper ST Maxx 35x12.5x20 tires.

I believe the member's names are Pancepance (BDS) and Mcrunner (Zone)

both of their trucks were 4wd I believe.

 

Hope this helps

Posted (edited)

I've also seen a guy running the rcx 2.5 level with stock wheels running 35s, yes it rubs but not bad he said. Wasn't on here tho was on Facebook.

Edited by 2014Sandylifted
Posted

So what made you change rear bumper to one without steps?

 

 

Mine came like that apparently from factory , it was the last all terrain on the lot so they gave me a good deal on it

 

My Current Setup,2014 Silverado 2LT Z71,RCX 2.5 Level Kit,NittoTerra 33x12.50R20Lt's,Fuel - Octane D509 20x9 -12 Offset,All Chrome Plasti-Diped

My Up Coming Mod's,McGhauphy's 7"-9" Economy Lift Kit,Federal Couragia M/T's 35x12.50R20Lt's,OEM Tow Mirror's,Bushwaker OE Fender Flairs,Gtr Lighting Led Conversion Kit's 2,200 Lumen(High,Low,Fog),Black Spyder Venom Bull Bar,Iron Cross HD Step's.

Posted (edited)

Can someone with the Zone 4.5" post a picture of their angles?

 

I have a crazy idea which I dont know will work or not. I'd love to lift the front of my truck about 3.5 or 4 inches but I don't want RC's 3.5" kit and I'm not spending the money for BDS's 4" kit (which I read is way over 4 inches anyways). I'm also not interested in overextended 4" kits like Mcgaughys or Readylift.

 

What if I installed Zones 4.5" kit, for example, but used RC's 3.5" spacers from their kit (or Bilstein adjustables with a 3" level block)?

 

Stupid idea? Would my angles be in the negative? I think Zone's 4.5" angles are pretty flat so I'm thinking the angle of my axles might be inverted.

Edited by 14x4
Posted

Can someone with the Zone 4.5" post a picture of their angles?

 

I have a crazy idea which I dont know will work or not. I'd love to lift the front of my truck about 3.5 or 4 inches but I don't want RC's 3.5" kit and I'm not spending the money for BDS's 4" kit (which I read is way over 4 inches anyways). I'm also not interested in overextended 4" kits like Mcgaughys or Readylift.

 

What if I installed Zones 4.5" kit, for example, but used RC's 3.5" spacers from their kit (or Bilstein adjustables with a 3" level block)?

 

Stupid idea? Would my angles be in the negative? I think Zone's 4.5" angles are pretty flat so I'm thinking the angle of my axles might be inverted.

I will when I get my truck back this week.
  • Like 1
Posted

how much u think about hat 4.5" zone will cost

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

using Tapatalk

Having mine installed w airbag, spacers 1900.00
  • Like 1
Posted

Does anyone have a picture with a 3" Performance Accessory body lift on a 14/15? I already have a 2.25" Pro Comp Level Kit installed and I am thinking of getting a more economical 3" lift for the body. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted

Having mine installed w airbag, spacers 1900.00

ive got bags with the rancho quicklift but I want it up higher now with little bigger tires. [emoji106]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...