Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here you go Mike

 

Front 43" Rear 443/4" ( I also have rear airbags)

 

322705eda72444d79b7c5c941f5d3c66.jpg

 

554d8497209589c139ffd7d6d711bcf0.jpg

 

55fff789ac5a2c107f3a49ce8a487387.jpg

 

38c7733f6f80bd25d200e117d8c73412.jpg

 

32ced444654dc22f84b19490cfe2771f.jpg

 

7773778d969fc356794417a9620e703b.jpg

 

 

Great looking truck. I get mine back today from the installer.

Posted

 

 

thanks man! Looks really good. Is that rake being caused by the air bags? I plan to do air bags when I get my lift but certainly don't want that much rake. I like the look of these trucks better when they are level front to back.

 

 

 

 

Ive checked both the Toyo MT (on the Silvy with the BDS kit) and the Generals. Both are manufacture spec'd at 35" as actual diameter. I did also take the black fender outlines into account but I don't think that is it. At least I can't imagine that the black outlines would make that big of a difference. I notice the most difference in that it looks taller. Much taller

 

 

 

 

 

thanks man! Looks really good. Is that rake being caused by the air bags? I plan to do air bags when I get my lift but certainly don't want that much rake. I like the look of these trucks better when they are level front to back.

 

 

 

 

Ive checked both the Toyo MT (on the Silvy with the BDS kit) and the Generals. Both are manufacture spec'd at 35" as actual diameter. I did also take the black fender outlines into account but I don't think that is it. At least I can't imagine that the black outlines would make that big of a difference. I notice the most difference in that it looks taller. Much taller

 

Agreed this looks taller for some reason when compared to other pictures of 4-4.5 lifts. 35's normally looked jammed on a 4" lift but this really looks great. If my lift project looks like this when I am done, I will be very happy. I may have to consider Generals, but not a fan of the red letters. I wonder if having larger wheels (like 20's) affects the overall appearance? This one is spot on in my opinion. Nice job!

  • Like 1
Posted

How is the ride/noise with the Generals and or the air bags? I wasn't planning bags, but I do like the look of a little rake.

Posted

7" Fabtech, Stock 20's and 35" Lexani Mud Beast. Decided to keep the wheels stock for now to see what it looked like. So far im happy with it.

 

s6hvC1B.jpg

S9R8zcG.jpg

PdKeIoE.jpg

fujzKxo.jpg

 

How did you use the stock wheels with your FabTech 7" lift? I thought for sure you'd have to go with an aftermarket wheel. My stock 20"s have a +27 offset and I was told that I'd definitely have to swap out my rims with a different offset rim if I lifted my truck...

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is couple from this morning.

 

Brininger! I love your truck! In fact it's the exact same one as mine, other than the fact that I have a 2.25" Ready Lift leveling kit on mine. You obviously have a lift kit on yours. Please tell me what lift kit you are using--and what is the hight? I can't believe you have the factory rims on there! I love the factory rims! I just didn't know you could still use them on a lifted truck. What kit do you have that allows you to use the factory rims? The ones you and I have are a +27. Also, what tires are those? Size?...Thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted

 

How did you use the stock wheels with your FabTech 7" lift? I thought for sure you'd have to go with an aftermarket wheel. My stock 20"s have a +27 offset and I was told that I'd definitely have to swap out my rims with a different offset rim if I lifted my truck...

I wondered the same. Fabtech says factory bs wont work. I guess they were incorrect bc clearly this truck has them installed.
  • Like 1
Posted

5e0a09c8f08d6fb4a990b95adcda0607.jpg

 

406ea31501608a98a507a897d2679a30.jpg

 

12917c254b400facf7aac12ac7529a93.jpg

 

Finally got a set of tires on the truck. There a 35x12.50r17. Looks way better. I also found out that a rzr 800s will fit in an extra short box truck!!

  • Like 2
Posted

5e0a09c8f08d6fb4a990b95adcda0607.jpg

 

406ea31501608a98a507a897d2679a30.jpg

 

12917c254b400facf7aac12ac7529a93.jpg

 

Finally got a set of tires on the truck. There a 35x12.50r17. Looks way better. I also found out that a rzr 800s will fit in an extra short box truck!!

What lift kit you running
Posted (edited)

Add a 3inch body lift an throw 37s on it, with 22s be sick.

Edited by 2014Sandylifted
Posted

 

How did you use the stock wheels with your FabTech 7" lift? I thought for sure you'd have to go with an aftermarket wheel. My stock 20"s have a +27 offset and I was told that I'd definitely have to swap out my rims with a different offset rim if I lifted my truck...

 

 

I apologize for my previous post. I had originally thought that because that's what my shop told me. Upon further investigation when I had the wheels off to get my new ones on I discovered they put spacers on. The front has like a half inch or less spacer, very small. The rear is using like an inch and a half or 2 to line up with the front. I looked when I first got it installed but clearly missed the rear ones.

Posted

c6f7a23c863b807670dc71177b8e54d3.jpg

I love that truck, kinda wish it was a long box though. Then it would be like a 2014 version of my old K15

  • Like 2
Posted

I NEED ANSWERS lol I have a 2014 gmc and have the 5 inch rough country lift with 305/55/20's with a -24 offset no trimming and love the stance.. want to get 35's since my 33's are worn out .. bought a 1.25 body lift and wondering if that will work?

Posted

Finally got my lift installed. 6.5" Zone suspension & 1.5" Zone body with 35x12.5x20 Trail Grapplers, 20x9 Fuel Krank with 0 offset and 5 backspace.

post-130832-0-05950600-1426253283_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-04700200-1426253289_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-05950600-1426253283_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-04700200-1426253289_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-05950600-1426253283_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-04700200-1426253289_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-05950600-1426253283_thumb.jpg

post-130832-0-04700200-1426253289_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,046 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...