Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here It Is..I would definitely recommend bilstein 5100 for the rear. and it still fits in my garage as well

post-149492-0-02303700-1448064222_thumb.png

post-149492-0-02303700-1448064222_thumb.png

post-149492-0-02303700-1448064222_thumb.png

post-149492-0-02303700-1448064222_thumb.png

Edited by Mtxkidd
  • Like 2
Posted

this is what I'm talking about, badass [emoji106]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You guys need fender flares :pimp:

Posted

I don't have 3:08 but do have 3:42 and I can say if there is a difference I can't tell. Drives the same to me as it did before. Maybe if towing a difference could be noticed.

I have the 3.42 gears but I was just wondering the answer to this question myself. Hopefully someone will chime in.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Mtx kidd which 5 inch lift did you go with the bracket or the knuckle lift. Also are you running bilsteins in just the rear?

Edited by mrhonestlyinsane
Posted (edited)

I don't have 3:08 but do have 3:42 and I can say if there is a difference I can't tell. Drives the same to me as it did before. Maybe if towing a difference could be noticed.

 

Good point.

 

I've noticed the same thing. I've recently driven trucks with 35" tires that have 3.42 (5.3L 6 speed) gears and 3.23 (6.2L 8 speed) gears and under normal acceleration/driving there was little difference in the way they drove. When driving them under mid to hard acceleration, the difference was noticeable (as expected) but not alarming or unacceptable IMO. They still got the job done easily and were still fun to drive.

 

Let me also clarify, I don't drive trucks like a "bat-outta-hell" or "like I stole it" either. 90-95% of my driving is under normal acceleration. With that said, I wouldn't hesitate to add a lift & 35's" to a 3.42 5.3L or 3.23 6.2L and leave the gears as they are.

Edited by Front Runner
  • Like 1
Posted

You guys need fender flares :pimp:

im not a big fan of fender flares, just not my thing,

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Sorry for late response guys..It's the Knuckle kit and I'm only running the bilsteins in the rear...still have the factory ranchos up front...

Posted

Not to thread jack, but I guess I'm in between the leveled and suspension lift threads from a height perspective. I went with the 2.5" level + 1.5" Body Lift and have a total of $240 in 4"s of lift. Install was easy, retains warranty (at least according to my dealer), and is reversible unlike cutting up the crossmember for a full suspension lift. Can't go wrong with this setup in my opinion.

 

20140318_194657_RichtoneHDR_zpsn3hz79tl.

 

20140321_172139_RichtoneHDR_zpsbdq0kk7l.

I still have not found a reply on the ride quality with this set up. I already have the 2.5 level on the same truck. I also wanted to keep the stock ride quality. Will the body lift make it ride like crap or should I just stay with what I have. I'll be adding some 275/60/20 Nitto terra grapplers or 295/60/20. I would love the to do the CK158 22" wheels but I cant get a Nitto terra grappler in a 285/50/22 or even a 295/50/22. I have 3.42 gears with the 5.3. Need help here.

Posted

From what I've read, I don't believe that a body lift will have any affect on ride quality. My understanding is that ride quality falls under the suspension category.

  • Like 1
Posted

I still have not found a reply on the ride quality with this set up. I already have the 2.5 level on the same truck. I also wanted to keep the stock ride quality. Will the body lift make it ride like crap or should I just stay with what I have. I'll be adding some 275/60/20 Nitto terra grapplers or 295/60/20. I would love the to do the CK158 22" wheels but I cant get a Nitto terra grappler in a 285/50/22 or even a 295/50/22. I have 3.42 gears with the 5.3. Need help here.

The body lift won't change the ride I have the 1.5 zone and 2.5rc. The 2.5 made a slight difference and the E rated larger tires makes it a little more rough
  • Like 1
Posted

I still have not found a reply on the ride quality with this set up. I already have the 2.5 level on the same truck. I also wanted to keep the stock ride quality. Will the body lift make it ride like crap or should I just stay with what I have. I'll be adding some 275/60/20 Nitto terra grapplers or 295/60/20. I would love the to do the CK158 22" wheels but I cant get a Nitto terra grappler in a 285/50/22 or even a 295/50/22. I have 3.42 gears with the 5.3. Need help here.

The 1.5" body lift isn't going to change the ride. It will be the same as it is now with the level.

 

If you are on stock 20s go with the 295/60 if you add the body lift.

 

If you want 22s and no body lift, the terra grappler is available in 285/50/22. If you do the body lift there is also a slightly taller 285/55/22.

  • Like 1
Posted

The 1.5" body lift isn't going to change the ride. It will be the same as it is now with the level.

If you are on stock 20s go with the 295/60 if you add the body lift.

If you want 22s and no body lift, the terra grappler is available in 285/50/22. If you do the body lift there is also a slightly taller 285/55/22.

The 1.5" body lift isn't going to change the ride. It will be the same as it is now with the level.

If you are on stock 20s go with the 295/60 if you add the body lift.

If you want 22s and no body lift, the terra grappler is available in 285/50/22. If you do the body lift there is also a slightly taller 285/55/22.

That's perfect thanks for the help. That's what I needed to know.
Posted

Got a question guys I've got a 5 inch lift and 34s...I am about to get a extra tire for my factory 20 so I can have a full size spare..how big of a spare can fit the spare tire location...what have you guys been able to fit in there..?..looks like ill have the room but curios as to what you guys have done in these cases

Posted

Anyone running the Zone 4.5" that can take some pictures at different angles next to a stock height silverado? I was dead set on the Zone 6.5" and when i was passing my local dealership i saw they had a 2015 CC with a Pro Comp 6" lift.

 

I ended up test driving it and loved it. It was a lot taller in person than i thought. Pictures don't really do these trucks justice! The 6" was badass, but the dealer didn't have steps on it so it was different having to put some effort into getting up there! LOL (Im 5'-06") I loved the lift, however I'm now thinking that the 4.5" might be better suited for me, but i can't decide without seeing one in person.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
    • Engines wear. It is unavoidable. So the question isn't if it will wear out but rather WHEN it will wear out. That question is about rate and RATE is a HUGE problem for almost everyone; but not in the way we may think.    Unless there is something drastically wrong with your powertrain, wear is exceedingly slow. It doesn't wear out in minutes or hours or days or months but in years or even decades. Ditto sludge and varnish. Humans are an impatient lot so to see the benefit of a truly superior product you may have to wait a very long time. Most will get bored first and trade before they reap the benefit.   Humans are not companionate creatures when it comes to those we do not know. We don't care what happens to the second or third owner as long as it doesn't happen to us or someone we know and actually like.   Sad commentary on humans but it is what it is. That thus, then, there is no advantage...to or for you if the above paragraphs adequately describe you.    BUT if you are a buy and hold type and patient enough to reap the rewards of your labors then that thing that is happening that you haven't yet seen, but will; can be abated by such products. Seals harden and leak with time and lots of it. Rings stick after thousands of miles of a slowly building plaque of varnish.    Then there is this. This didn't happen over night and this poor fellow knew when he removed the cover and not one second before.   Not "aware' isn't the same thing as "isn't happening".        The above was typical of the Ford 361 and 391 bus motors on Bulk Pennzoil Mineral Oil products on 3K mile OCI's at about 60K miles back in the 60's and 70's at the Anamosa School District when my Uncle took over their maintenance program.    This is Pepper at @ 165K on 5K OCI's using Group IV/V Full Synthetics.      HM oils will help the first but not the second.    Then again if one used..... ah, ya know.....
    • Thanks for coming back with an update. 
    • Awesome you got it sorted! That's a new potential issue I'll have to mark in my book of issues. Thanks for the feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...