Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 14 All Terrain got a 5 inch RC with some bfg ko2s 285/65r20. Love the way it turned out, thanks for all the info received thru the fourm the last few weeks, so much info on here. Anybody change the struts up front to do away with the spacers? Does it help ride? Ride is not bad at all now by the way.

post-155522-0-35142900-1463965101_thumb.jpg

post-155522-0-35142900-1463965101_thumb.jpg

post-155522-0-35142900-1463965101_thumb.jpg

post-155522-0-35142900-1463965101_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

My 14 All Terrain got a 5 inch RC with some bfg ko2s 285/65r20. Love the way it turned out, thanks for all the info received thru the fourm the last few weeks, so much info on here. Anybody change the struts up front to do away with the spacers? Does it help ride? Ride is not bad at all now by the way.

More pics please !!

Posted

has anyone ever put the rough country 1.25 inch body lift on a truck? Or even better does anyone have it on their 2014 or know someone with it? I'm thinking about putting the 2.5" suspension level and then putting the 1.25" body lift. Along with 33inch A/T on KMC XD Series Hoss rims wrapped with 275 60 R20s. For anyone who has a few moments to spare check out the link and let me know what you think about the rims and about the lift ideas!!

 

BTW they will be going on the 2014 Sierra Crew Cab short bed white diamond tricoat

 

 

20" KMC XD Series Hoss Rims

http://www.tirerack.com/wheels/WheelCloseUpServlet?target=runWheelSearch&initialPartNumber=XD79529062830BMF&wheelMake=KMC+XD+Series&wheelModel=Hoss&wheelFinish=Machined+w%2FBlack+Accent&showRear=no&autoMake=GMC&autoModel=Sierra+1500+4wd&autoYear=2014&autoModClar=Crew+Cab&filterFinish=All&filterSize=All&filterBrand=KMC+XD+Series&filterSpecial=false&filterNew=All&filterWeight=All&sort=Brand

 

I have both...I installed the suspension kit first before they offered the combo

Posted

looking forward to seeing this one

 

So unfortunately I can't seem to be able to post pix but I have uploaded a few in my gallery so feel free to check em out. I am super stoked with how it turned out and it rides great.

  • Like 1
Posted

Good Day All,

 

I have a 2015 Sierra All Terrain, I want to lift it 4" and run 33" tires. I'm looking for recommendations on tires and lifts. Ive been looking at BDS 4" and wondering if the full coil over suspension is worth the extra$$$ or if I would ride as good with the basic Spacers.

Trust me the coil overs are worth it. I just got a BDS 4" with fox coil overs with DSC and fox rears and the truck rides awesome. I can also adjust firmness or plushness as desired. Also, I'm running 35" toyo rt's on custom factory 20's. I don't think you'll like 33's with this lift

Posted

So unfortunately I can't seem to be able to post pix but I have uploaded a few in my gallery so feel free to check em out. I am super stoked with how it turned out and it rides great.

Truck looks great. Try shrinking the size of your images. I do this on my iPhone by emailing them to myself. Once you hit the send button, it'll ask if you want "small, medium, large, or actual size" I choose medium or large depending on which one gets the set of photos under the 1mb max upload limit on the site. If you don't have an iPhone/iPad you can still do this on your computer via paint or photoshop.

Posted

Trust me the coil overs are worth it. I just got a BDS 4" with fox coil overs with DSC and fox rears and the truck rides awesome. I can also adjust firmness or plushness as desired. Also, I'm running 35" toyo rt's on custom factory 20's. I don't think you'll like 33's with this lift

I agree with Aberclaw, run the 35s to the specs BDS recommends and you won't need spaces or have rubbing. You'll probably want bigger tires as soon as you park your 33s next to 35s. As for the coilovers, I didn't put them on my truck and it rides great. Very close to stock going down the highway. I've had my truck less than a month and have taken it in desert, sand and mountain terrain (rocky). The truck has performed fine with the stock coilovers; however, I will be upgrading eventually. I want to be able to drive it more aggressively, e.g. you wouldn't want to take whoops in sand or dirt at too high a rate of speed on the stock coilovers, you really need the more sophisticated shock to get up into 50-70 mph range driving off road on aggressive terrain. However, if you never plan on taking your truck rock climbing or at high rates of speed over uneven terrain, you'll be fine without them. I certainly think the Fox option is a superior one, it just depends on whether or not you need it for your driving style.

Posted

Truck looks great. Try shrinking the size of your images. I do this on my iPhone by emailing them to myself. Once you hit the send button, it'll ask if you want "small, medium, large, or actual size" I choose medium or large depending on which one gets the set of photos under the 1mb max upload limit on the site. If you don't have an iPhone/iPad you can still do this on your computer via paint or photoshop.

Thanks I'll definitely give that shot!

Posted

Thanks I'll definitely give that shot!

all you need it to download the app Tapatalk. It allows you to use this forum and will automatically resize all images allowing you to post what ever pictures you want.

 

 

Sent by a simpleton struggling to operate an iPhone.

  • Like 2
Posted

I am ecstatic how the zone lift works on my 2016 Sierra! Also has the ranch I front strut assembly! I have owned several truck lifted 6" or higher and this is the most stable smooth riding setup I have ever been in.post-136507-0-97232200-1464452682_thumb.jpeg

post-136507-0-97232200-1464452682_thumb.jpeg

post-136507-0-97232200-1464452682_thumb.jpeg

post-136507-0-97232200-1464452682_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

Ok here's some of the pix I have of my truck for now until it stops pouring rain and I can give it a proper detail

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

d6a7cf997c50dfe7b0524f8590e0e9cf.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...