Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 hours ago, G4Bama said:

Do you have any issues with rubbing?

No. I actually ran the same tire size with 2.5" level w/no issues, but I did zip tie the fender liners back.

Posted
15 minutes ago, dubwise said:

No. I actually ran the same tire size with 2.5" level w/no issues, but I did zip tie the fender liners back.

Thanks

  • 2 months later...
Posted

So I have a 2018 z71 and I want to put 37s on my stock 22s what’s the lowest lift I can get without going crazy high? I don’t mind a little trimming but don’t want to butcher the truck. Thank you!

Posted (edited)

Not sure it helps with your ask, but im running a 6.5" lift from Zone on my 2017 Z71 and the biggest i could go is 35's on my stock rims, with a 1/4" spacer.

Edited by cubangt
Posted

Hey guys brand new to the forum so forgive my ignorance please. Didn’t want to make a new topic so I’ll post my questions here. I’ve got a 2017 GMC Sierra slt z71 package with the ranchero shocks. I do about 90% of my driving on road. I spent some time on this site and came to the conclusion I wanted to purchase a full set of fox 2.0 to level the truck. Right before I hit the checkout I started to think that maybe Due to the price of leveling just spend the money on a 3” lift. I’ve never lifted a truck before so all of this is new to me. What is the recommended kit that will allow me to have a leveled 3” lifted truck that will allow for 33-35” tires without rub or modifications to the fender well? I would like to achieve the same level of on road smoothness that a fox 2.0 would bring just a tad higher. I feel like I’m at the point of information overload. Any advice or information on the topic would be greatly appreciated. 

Posted
4 hours ago, DocHodges said:

Hey guys brand new to the forum so forgive my ignorance please. Didn’t want to make a new topic so I’ll post my questions here. I’ve got a 2017 GMC Sierra slt z71 package with the ranchero shocks. I do about 90% of my driving on road. I spent some time on this site and came to the conclusion I wanted to purchase a full set of fox 2.0 to level the truck. Right before I hit the checkout I started to think that maybe Due to the price of leveling just spend the money on a 3” lift. I’ve never lifted a truck before so all of this is new to me. What is the recommended kit that will allow me to have a leveled 3” lifted truck that will allow for 33-35” tires without rub or modifications to the fender well? I would like to achieve the same level of on road smoothness that a fox 2.0 would bring just a tad higher. I feel like I’m at the point of information overload. Any advice or information on the topic would be greatly appreciated. 

I think it's a matter of preference..for me personally, I started at leveling at 2 1/2", 5 now 6 1/2"..ya I know the weird height difference but my truck is unusual. 

 

Sorry for bad pic..it's quite hot out here

16279442658351430347011893575287.jpg

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, DocHodges said:

Hey guys brand new to the forum so forgive my ignorance please. Didn’t want to make a new topic so I’ll post my questions here. I’ve got a 2017 GMC Sierra slt z71 package with the ranchero shocks. I do about 90% of my driving on road. I spent some time on this site and came to the conclusion I wanted to purchase a full set of fox 2.0 to level the truck. Right before I hit the checkout I started to think that maybe Due to the price of leveling just spend the money on a 3” lift. I’ve never lifted a truck before so all of this is new to me. What is the recommended kit that will allow me to have a leveled 3” lifted truck that will allow for 33-35” tires without rub or modifications to the fender well? I would like to achieve the same level of on road smoothness that a fox 2.0 would bring just a tad higher. I feel like I’m at the point of information overload. Any advice or information on the topic would be greatly appreciated. 

I think I've posted this about 5 times now.
I went with a 3" Motofab level, a MotoFab UCA and 1-1/2" Zone rear spring lift, as well as a 1" MotoFab rear block lift.Also, I did a 1-1/2" Zone body lift and a 1" bilstein shock lift.
35's fit fine.
I'm thinking of going to a full 8" lift and 37s but, for now, I'm happy with what I have.
BTW, stock 18" rims though upgraded to black polished ones.
Why would I want to go bigger? this is my old C-10:
1579312518_78truck.thumb.jpg.2be1cfd39f61e585722a5fc8c98e01e1.jpg
IMG_0148.thumb.jpg.f81693e7befce9035df7f55bdf45101c.jpg

Edited by MikeBMW
Posted

@SwisherSweets @MikeBMW thank you for the information. I am looking at starting off with the life I linked below. I’m having trouble finding any reviews on it. Not sure if anyone where has used a similar kit. My biggest worry is I spend the money on the kit and absolutely hate the ride quality. 
 

https://cognitomotorsports.com/cognito-3-inch-performance-leveling-kit-with-fox-2.0-ifp-shocks-for-07-18-silverado-sierra-1500-2wd-4wd.html

Posted
7 hours ago, DocHodges said:

@SwisherSweets @MikeBMW thank you for the information. I am looking at starting off with the life I linked below. I’m having trouble finding any reviews on it. Not sure if anyone where has used a similar kit. My biggest worry is I spend the money on the kit and absolutely hate the ride quality. 
 

https://cognitomotorsports.com/cognito-3-inch-performance-leveling-kit-with-fox-2.0-ifp-shocks-for-07-18-silverado-sierra-1500-2wd-4wd.html

That kit should be fine. However, I would, also, get a rear 1" or 2" block lift.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MikeBMW said:

That kit should be fine. However, I would, also, get a rear 1" or 2" block lift.

Awesome thank you for the confirmation. I know both the front and rear offer 1” adjustment to the height but ideally I would want to leave the adjustments at 0” to ensure smoother on road performance. It seems I can’t find any information on how the 3” up front is achieved. Going with the kit and assuming no shock heigh adjustment would the UCA increase the ride height or would I need a front and rear block for height adjustment and simply use the shocks for the ride? Sorry like I said I’m new to all this. It’s a bit confusing and not very clear when shopping. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, DocHodges said:

Awesome thank you for the confirmation. I know both the front and rear offer 1” adjustment to the height but ideally I would want to leave the adjustments at 0” to ensure smoother on road performance. It seems I can’t find any information on how the 3” up front is achieved. Going with the kit and assuming no shock heigh adjustment would the UCA increase the ride height or would I need a front and rear block for height adjustment and simply use the shocks for the ride? Sorry like I said I’m new to all this. It’s a bit confusing and not very clear when shopping. 

The 3" front level is achieved by the spacer on the top of the shocks.
As mentioned, you'll still need a rear block lift as I don't see rear shocks in the kit.
The UCAs create a better angle for the 3" level at the control arm ball joint.

Posted
On 8/3/2021 at 2:50 PM, MikeBMW said:

The 3" front level is achieved by the spacer on the top of the shocks.
As mentioned, you'll still need a rear block lift as I don't see rear shocks in the kit.
The UCAs create a better angle for the 3" level at the control arm ball joint.

It looks to me that the kit comes with both front and rear with the UCA also. Been trying to find reviews on the kit but may just end up buying and installing. Seems an easy enough DIY just need alignment after. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, DocHodges said:

It looks to me that the kit comes with both front and rear with the UCA also. Been trying to find reviews on the kit but may just end up buying and installing. Seems an easy enough DIY just need alignment after. 

I might have missed the entire content of the kit, but, really, it seems to be a great setup for what you want.
If I hadn't already done my install, I'd seriously consider it.
Cognito is a trusted name in lifts, UCAs and levels.
Pretty sure you've already watched this, but here it is:

 

Edited by MikeBMW
Posted
On 8/6/2021 at 3:35 PM, MikeBMW said:

I might have missed the entire content of the kit, but, really, it seems to be a great setup for what you want.
If I hadn't already done my install, I'd seriously consider it.
Cognito is a trusted name in lifts, UCAs and levels.
Pretty sure you've already watched this, but here it is:

 

I 2nd that as well..

They are stiff and very strong. 

I didn't scroll to previous pages as well but another consideration for the rear is having rear air bags. I think you might to consider that as well. You can adjust the rear end to pretty much to being level to the front end. If it's been discussed already, I apologize. 

 

I'll post pics in a couple of hours when my wife comes back with truck

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

After gathering a lot of good info on here and other places, I went ahead and got the Eibach Pro-Truck Lift Kit.  I had the kit installed and he said it was a good way to start a Friday morning.  I wanted the Coilover 2.0s but couldn't find them in stock and needed to level up the truck before getting tires on Monday.  The kit lifted the front a solid 3", looks like I need to add a block to the rear but letting it settle first.  I used the second groove on the front shocks.

 

This is my first truck and first leveling kit.  I was concerned with the ride quality, I can't believe how amazing the ride is compared to original Ranchos with 88,000 miles.  No more bouncing around, this thing is tight but not stiff.  It corners well and I'm super stoked about this decision!

 

Here are some pics, I hope this helps someone.

First three are Before ...next two are After.

 

I'm getting 285/70r18 Nitto Ridge Grapplers on Monday (currently stock Duratracs) , I'll update with more pics ...and hopefully a cleaner truck HAHA.

PXL_20201016_204022128_A.jpg

IMG_20200401_121309 (2)_A.jpg

IMG_20200401_121410 (2).jpg

PXL_20210910_144854964_A.jpg

PXL_20210910_145005172.jpg

 

Edited by Pinky Z71
Clarify pics, delete bad pic
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...