Jump to content

Front Brakes

demech23

Recommended Posts

demech23 Enthusiast

demech23

Posted
Posted

During the last month I have put, roughly, a thousand miles on my 2010 Silverado 1500 while towing a trailer (without trailer brakes) and carrying load. After a some hard emergency stops from slightly above highway speeds, I now have a slight vibration in the brake pedal only when stopping from speeds around 50mph and above. I have a feeling that I didn't warp the rear drum set up. So since I usually replace things before they really need to be (I hate slight vibrations) I was looking at replacing the front pads and rotors. I know the vibration is not wheel weight related because during my last oil change before the trips I rotated and rebalanced all the wheels. I have not thown any weights and I mark the tire near the rim with a paint pen because the new weights are a pain to hammer on so I know they haven't moved. My cost for dealer OEM pads and rotors (non-economy AC Delco's) is $248.60, or should I go with a brand like EBC and get yellow pads and sport rotors for $294.25. I have 42k on the truck, what do you guys think I would have better luck with?

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gurrzt Enthusiast

Gurrzt

Posted
Posted

I personally like the "Baer Eradaspeed" rotors coupled to "Hawk HPS" pads.

 

Also consider replacing the rubber brake hoses with "Russell" stainless steel wrapped hoses.

dkjbama Enthusiast

dkjbama

Posted
Posted

Your rotors are warped. Nothing at all wrong with the pads unless their worn out (doubtful). If you don't tow an unbraked trailer like this all the time and this is the first time this has happened, I'd just have the rotors turned and move on with life.

rudyb Enthusiast

rudyb

Posted
Posted

I'm having the same issue, except this will be the second time I've replaced the front brakes. I'm tired of wasting money on crap brakes from oriellys. Is there a heavy duty option for a 16" wheel and 6lug bolt pattern? I was considering going with something like wilwood or brembo, but I haven't seen anything made for a wheel smaller than an 18". Gurrzt and Bruce, have you pulled a trailer and put some abuse to those brakes? I'd like to know if they can handle more than the vehicle alone. Thanks, Rudy.

BruceDeuce Enthusiast

BruceDeuce

Posted
Posted

I pull from 1000lbs to 2500lbs all the time and the Green stuff pads are night n day from stock. I also add the Platinum Pro Stop rotors from Pep Boys. Im doing the rear brakes this weekend.

Gurrzt Enthusiast

Gurrzt

Posted
Posted

rotors definatley warped.. replace before the pads get messed up

If his rotors are that warped that he can feel the shimmy, he should (in my opinion) replace the pads at the time of the rotor installation. The rotor warpage probably wore down the pads unevenly.

 

By replacing the brake pads with the rotors, he can "mate" them together properly per the manufacturers instructions.

 

JMHO

demech23 Enthusiast

demech23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If his rotors are that warped that he can feel the shimmy, he should (in my opinion) replace the pads at the time of the rotor installation. The rotor warpage probably wore down the pads unevenly.

 

By replacing the brake pads with the rotors, he can "mate" them together properly per the manufacturers instructions.

 

JMHO

 

Agreed, I could turn the rotors at work, but why make warped rotors even thinner? I see it quite often where the tech's turn rotors that they usually comes back with a pulsation not too long after ( probably already under min. spec). I know that the pad's still have plenty of life on them, but they will still get replaced with the new rotors. I have been looking into the Baer Eradaspeed rotors with Hawk pads. I like the improved stopping power but it is costly. However, that's nothing compared to a collision repair from hitting a deer or what not that could of prossibly been avoided. The only problem is that there are few reviews on the rotor kit and I don't want to run into any issues.

Gurrzt Enthusiast

Gurrzt

Posted
Posted

Agreed, I could turn the rotors at work, but why make warped rotors even thinner? I see it quite often where the tech's turn rotors that they usually comes back with a pulsation not too long after ( probably already under min. spec). I know that the pad's still have plenty of life on them, but they will still get replaced with the new rotors. I have been looking into the Baer Eradaspeed rotors with Hawk pads. I like the improved stopping power but it is costly. However, that's nothing compared to a collision repair from hitting a deer or what not that could of prossibly been avoided. The only problem is that there are few reviews on the rotor kit and I don't want to run into any issues.

Your life is worth more than the price of the rotors and brake pads, when it comes to these components "you get what you pay for".

 

I have had this setup on Sara (2001 Z28) for over 10 years, and have not experienced any problems with warpage or excessive brake pad wear.

Mossyoakglock Senior Enthusiast

Mossyoakglock

Posted
Posted

I have Powerslot slotted rotors and Hawk LTS pads. I've had them on the truck for about 1,000 miles and I'm about to take them off. They squeal something awful in the mornings, they squeal at low speed stops and they occasionally squeal while driving. I won't buy Hawk pads again. I've had them checked by two different shops and they said everything looks great and the pads are wearing evenly. I've also bed them in twice. They also dust like crazy.

 

I'm keeping the rotors but will be replacing the pads with Akebono's soon.

 

I did some research recently on some of the most popular pads for our trucks and found out that the friction rating for all of them are the same. The Hawk LTS pads have a rating of FF. The Akebonos, Wagners and all AC Delco pads are FF as well (called each company directly to confirm). Not sure on EBC but I would assume the same. Even though they are considered "performance pads", they have the same rating as all the other pads for our trucks. Not much difference in performance for double the price vs a good ceramic. Go with a quality ceramic pad and good rotors. They will have much less noise and much less dust and still stop just the same.

 

Once I get the Akebonos swapped in I might get some stainless steel lines but we'll see.

demech23 Enthusiast

demech23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Baer just responded to an email I sent them. They say that their Eradaspeed rotor upgrade kit fit OEM rims that are 20" plus and that my 18" won't work with their set up.

kstruckcountry Senior Enthusiast

kstruckcountry

Posted
Posted

I have the EBC green stuff and it stops on a dime.

I'm very happy with my EBC Greenstuff pads. I've had them on for around 1000 miles now. I haven't tried slotted rotors, I don't like anything that traps dust. I do think it would be a good idea to just go ahead and replace yours, even if you turn them I bet the vibration will be back.

TheTrueMoron Enthusiast

TheTrueMoron

Posted
Posted

What about PowerStop? I put them on my last truck and they were great while it lasted. I didn't do anything more than daily driving with them though and the truck was totaled about a week after I got them on.

c4cruiser Enthusiast

c4cruiser

Posted
Posted

What's the gross trailer weight you are towing? Single axle trailer? The gross towing weight along with any cargo (your buddies, the kids, dog, wife and/or girlfriend, etc.) you have inside the truck will impact braking performance. So will braking going down hills over longer distances. Excessive heat buildup can easily lower braking performance. A few panic stops should not be a big issue with regards to disc pad and/or brake shoe life assuming your trailer weight is fairly small (like a thousand pounds or less).

 

When I had my '99 Silverado with 4 wheel discs, I towed an open car trailer with a gross weight of 5600 lbs. The trailer had brakes on both axles. When I traded that truck in on my current '08 Silverado, the '99 had 77K on it and still had a good 40% left on the original pads. Never had any issues at all with the factory brakes.

 

My '08 (also with 4 wheel discs) has 41K and I now have an enclosed trailer with a loaded weight of about 6800 lbs. The OEM brakes look like brand new. The rotors are smooth, no ridge at the outside edge and no signs of any cracks.

 

If the rotors are warped, there is no way to machine them. You can go with AC Delco rotors as a replacement or look at Raybestos "Professional Grade" rotors available from Rockauto. There is nothing really wrong with the current line of GM brake pads for their pickups. Of course, the dealer wants a ton for them, but they are available from other sources like Amazon or Rockauto.

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...