Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I dunno what to tell ya there. I have a 4.3 4x4. I get about 15 around town IF I run auto 4x4. 17-20 if I put it in 2wd.

Posted

No mods and always in 2wd. Not dogging it either. Haven't towed anything yet. The truck is only a month old so I'm still babying it for now. On the highway I set the cruise control at 65 mph. I bumped up the tire pressure from the factory 35 to 40 psi cold to see if that might help slightly.

Posted

For what it's worth, it is still winter. Is it really cold where you are? You'll always see dips with cold weather..but my new 5.3 really is impacted by cold. On cold days I get 16.5 to 18.5....the last warm up we had I got over 20 easily. That to me is a huge swing in MPG due to temp.

Posted

I haven't really monitored how the cold effects the tunes yet, but it's obvious that it does, I get excellent MPG when it's 40+ but when it gets in the teens I would venture to say that I'm down 25% on mileage.

Posted

I have 4500 on my 5.3 and if I drive freeway I get great mileage but in town it's all stop and go and all one to two mile trips I can get as low as 9.8mpg

 

Short trips dont allow the motor to warm up to peak efficiency. And in stop and go, low mpg is to be expected. You cant take an average from a 1-2 mile trip. Its more accurate over several hundred miles.

 

 

Sorry guys. Guess I should have proof read my post. I meant I'm only getting 15 MPG.

 

Even if its only 15 mpg. there are more factors at play here. winter blend gas. cold temps. new engine break in.

 

How are you calculating? best way to do it is clear your trip meter on each fill up. then see how many miles you drive on the tank and divide by the number of gallons you put in. The DIC will sometimes be 1-2mpg off for the worse or the better.

Posted

I calculate by using the trip and a full tank. The DIC is always roughly 2 MPG or so more than the math shows. I know there's a lot of vairables for fuel milage, I'm just curious if everyone else with the 6 cylinder is getting around the same as me. I hate to drop it off at the dealer for something like fuel milage. Seems like most people went with the 5.3. I'm starting to wish I had.

Posted

Here in Michigan it's crazy temp swings. .. 20 one day 45 the next... And my mileage changes with the temp. ..I own a bipolar Sierra.

Posted

Had to chime in on temp swings. Lol not to bash ya but we had 70 degrees the other day and snow within 24 hours. Thats an Indiana temp swing lol. It will effect fuel milage for sure.

 

Sent from my LGL86C using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted
Here in Michigan it's crazy temp swings. .. 20 one day 45 the next... And my mileage changes with the temp. ..I own a bipolar Sierra.

 

Same here, same roads same conditions. It ridiculous! I wonder if a flashscan tune could fix this if Gm can't? A friend has a 2013 and it acts the same way, just not as extreme swings.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Just funny how GM hasn't said anything on this matter yet. I looked my truck up there was a problem with AFM before it left factory. website TIS2WEB input VIN# and show all the recalls and update before and after it was. built.

Posted

Just funny how GM hasn't said anything on this matter yet. I looked my truck up there was a problem with AFM before it left factory. website TIS2WEB input VIN# and show all the recalls and update before and after it was. built.

 

1 12663390 Main Operating System for Product Safety Recall 14008. 2 12659528 New calibration with diagnostic enhancements for DTC P0128. 3 12642488 Fuel System 4 12642600 Speedometer 5 12660170 New calibraton to address abrupt deceleration after an aborted shift. 6 12659743 New calibraton to address abrupt deceleration after an aborted shift and improve active fuel management operation. 7 12625016 Slave Operating System 8 12642481 Engine
Posted

I calculate by using the trip and a full tank. The DIC is always roughly 2 MPG or so more than the math shows. I know there's a lot of vairables for fuel milage, I'm just curious if everyone else with the 6 cylinder is getting around the same as me. I hate to drop it off at the dealer for something like fuel milage. Seems like most people went with the 5.3. I'm starting to wish I had.

I have the v6 and am getting really good mileage. The lowest I have gotten is in the 17's and the highest has been in the 20's. I think I'm averaging 18.3 or 18.4. No complaints on my side about mpg.

Posted

I have the 5.3 4x4 and surprisingly I get better mileage if I stay in the 40~50 mph range than anything above or below. I am thinking at higher speeds its the brick like aerodynamics and below 30 it doesn't seem to drop into V4 mode. So far the best I see is mid 22's at these slower speeds which is fine since I did not buy this as a daily driver.

Posted

I have a big issue that has popped up. I just filled up with E85 and after running about 100 miles the mpg looks dismal. I will not know for sure until I run a few tanks through. The issue and I guess you could say bright side is that this 5.3 engine loves the E85 you have to really be careful with the gas pedal as people will be staring at you because the rear tires are spinning on the slightest take off. you must gain over 50 HP with this alcohol fuel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,706 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...