Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

mnm99 Enthusiast

mnm99

Posted
Posted

Tough to say exactly because I did several mods (that can impact mpgs) right around the same time...but what I can talk you is I drive mostly highway, 70-75, don't get too crazy and I get 19-20 usually.

 

Here are all the mods that could have an effect on mileage: new number, delete resonator, delete flapper, added magnaflow muffler, front level kit, tonneau cover...

That's pretty good. I just went on a 500 mile drive and got 20.6mpg

  • Like 1
  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

bcbz71 Enthusiast

bcbz71

Posted
Posted

Hey Everybody!

 

New owner here and I've been reading post for a couple of months or so and I have become more confused than enlightened. I am stoked to have so much experience and knowledge available, but have become overwhelmed.

 

I hate to jump to simply asking a question that has probably been answered dozens of times in this forum, but here I go.

I recently bought a LTZ-Z71. I would like to level the truck without compromising my warranty and minimizing any loss of factory ride. I do have a basic understanding of the options based off of reading from this forum. 350 pages on one topic is too much though, and I was hoping someone who knows this subject well could simply break down the options. I am mechanically inclined and have a shop available to use, so labor cost or installation procedures are not my concern.

 

1) I have 33,000 on my Rough Country 2.5" level with the taller block for the rear. No issues. Truck drives as it did when new but looks totally different. I wouldn't worry about warranty issues on the suspension....really, what ever goes wrong with the suspension in 36,000 miles? or even 100,000 miles?

 

2) A level kit will limit your upper and lower travel, so you will feel your suspension bottom out when you go over a speed bump or a rutted road. On the street, the ride is the same as stock. Level kits are not a good option if you offroad a lot though. See #4.

 

3) It's fairly easy to put in a level if you don't have to compress the strut spring. I hear the 2016+ require you to put the top spacer inside of the strut which requires compressing the spring...leave that for a shop to do. The bottom spacer is the same regardless of the year and you can net 2" that way. You can do that in your driveway with a jack and some jack stands. YouTube has videos on it. Get an alignment afterwards.

 

4) If you want the best "level" kit, get a Fox or Icon complete coilover sway with Cognito swaybars, but honestly, I would just run a cheap spacer block until your OEM components wear out. Then go Fox + Cognito....that's what I plan to do. Like I said in #1, I'm at 33,000 miles and I see no sign of wear of my ball joints from a spacer kit.

 

5) A 2" level will allow you to run 33x11.5 (or smaller tires) without rub. Anything larger is going to hit something, whether it's carpet on the inside of your fenders, or plastic trim, or metal on the inside fender.

Waaazooo Senior Enthusiast

Waaazooo

Posted
Posted

 

1) I have 33,000 on my Rough Country 2.5" level with the taller block for the rear. No issues. Truck drives as it did when new but looks totally different. I wouldn't worry about warranty issues on the suspension....really, what ever goes wrong with the suspension in 36,000 miles? or even 100,000 miles?

 

2) A level kit will limit your upper and lower travel, so you will feel your suspension bottom out when you go over a speed bump or a rutted road. On the street, the ride is the same as stock. Level kits are not a good option if you offroad a lot though. See #4.

 

3) It's fairly easy to put in a level if you don't have to compress the strut spring. I hear the 2016+ require you to put the top spacer inside of the strut which requires compressing the spring...leave that for a shop to do. The bottom spacer is the same regardless of the year and you can net 2" that way. You can do that in your driveway with a jack and some jack stands. YouTube has videos on it. Get an alignment afterwards.

 

4) If you want the best "level" kit, get a Fox or Icon complete coilover sway with Cognito swaybars, but honestly, I would just run a cheap spacer block until your OEM components wear out. Then go Fox + Cognito....that's what I plan to do. Like I said in #1, I'm at 33,000 miles and I see no sign of wear of my ball joints from a spacer kit.

 

5) A 2" level will allow you to run 33x11.5 (or smaller tires) without rub. Anything larger is going to hit something, whether it's carpet on the inside of your fenders, or plastic trim, or metal on the inside fender.

#5 has some truth to it. I run a 275/65-20 (34") tire with no rubbing. The rubbing is 99% of the time because of offset or tire width up to 34" of tire. I don't believe I could go any less than +15 on 9" wheel with rubbing.

 

It does drive like stock... except the E rated tires are stiff.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tyrich88 Enthusiast

tyrich88

Posted
Posted (edited)

Since you asked, I am running the new Falken Wildpeak A/T3W's. And to be honest, I dont know if they are superior. What I do know, is they are significantly cheaper (about -$400 total) and run very quiet, along with having a very similar design to the KO2s. You would be hard pressed to find a user that has seen over 30k on those tires, so I am hoping they run well. But for the price, I couldnt say no.

 

Guys, I am not saying your tires are shit. In fact, I really like the tire. Like I said, I almost bought a set. But, I have a close friend that does the fleet maintenance for Virginia DOT trucks, and has repeatedly said that the KO2s they run on them are meticulously maintained, and still show significant wear at the 25-30k marks. So I was sharing that opinion. For future reference, now I know that if you arent on the BFG KO2 bandwagon, you better not post lol

 

But to say they are the "highest rated" is just as much an opinion as me saying they are way overpriced in reference to their performance against other brands. If I were to pick the tire I thought to be superior, without regard for price, I would choose the Toyo AT2. It is almost impossible to find a bad review about them, and I have personally seen them go nearly 70k miles with life left.

 

So in regards to this post... I will say that I have KO2's and have right around 30 k miles on mine and they have a good amount of life left in them. I would say about half. (I can take pictures if you would like to see).

My tires may or may not be the norm on the KO2's, I don't really know.

But i do love the tires. That being said, my next set will probably be Nitto's Toyo's or heck, maybe even those falkens if they are that good and affordable!

I only say that about my next set because I do a lot of highway driving and the offroad I do end up doing is jeep roads or ranch roads, so as long as i have a 10 ply tire, with decent AT tread, I am pretty set. The toyo and nitto having mileage warranty is a plus for sure.

Toyo and Nitto also seem to have a lot more size options than BFG does, and I've really been looking at 295/70r17 for my next set, which BFG doesn't produce and they're 285/70r17's seem pretty skinny for my tastes.

Edited by tyrich88
  • Like 1
TahoeRocks New Member

TahoeRocks

Posted
Posted

 

1) I have 33,000 on my Rough Country 2.5" level with the taller block for the rear. No issues. Truck drives as it did when new but looks totally different. I wouldn't worry about warranty issues on the suspension....really, what ever goes wrong with the suspension in 36,000 miles? or even 100,000 miles?

 

2) A level kit will limit your upper and lower travel, so you will feel your suspension bottom out when you go over a speed bump or a rutted road. On the street, the ride is the same as stock. Level kits are not a good option if you offroad a lot though. See #4.

 

3) It's fairly easy to put in a level if you don't have to compress the strut spring. I hear the 2016+ require you to put the top spacer inside of the strut which requires compressing the spring...leave that for a shop to do. The bottom spacer is the same regardless of the year and you can net 2" that way. You can do that in your driveway with a jack and some jack stands. YouTube has videos on it. Get an alignment afterwards.

 

4) If you want the best "level" kit, get a Fox or Icon complete coilover sway with Cognito swaybars, but honestly, I would just run a cheap spacer block until your OEM components wear out. Then go Fox + Cognito....that's what I plan to do. Like I said in #1, I'm at 33,000 miles and I see no sign of wear of my ball joints from a spacer kit.

 

5) A 2" level will allow you to run 33x11.5 (or smaller tires) without rub. Anything larger is going to hit something, whether it's carpet on the inside of your fenders, or plastic trim, or metal on the inside fender.

 

 

#5 has some truth to it. I run a 275/65-20 (34") tire with no rubbing. The rubbing is 99% of the time because of offset or tire width up to 34" of tire. I don't believe I could go any less than +15 on 9" wheel with rubbing.

 

It does drive like stock... except the E rated tires are stiff.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Hey y'all!

 

Thank you so much for the clear and precise information. I plan to keep the stock rims on the truck, and the stock tires as long as they last. Goodyear SR-A 275-55-20; I don't think rubbing will be an issue. The Rough Country 2" leveling kit seems to be the right choice. I don't plan to tow at this time, I am simply looking for a level appearance. This spacer is installed below the strut and should be something I can do with enjoyment and excitement in my own driveway. This truck is my daily driver. I do live in the mountains and enjoy camping, but I am not planning on ever truly off-roading-say rubicon style or anything. Many of the roads I travel in the summer are forest access roads, but they are tame and I will treat my new baby girl gently. Once again, thank you for the information. I will post before and after pictures to further the knowledge available on this forum.

 

Z

Travis1024 Enthusiast

Travis1024

Posted
Posted

20170419_135722_zpsvel8hqiq.jpg

 

Here is my 2017 with a 2 inch zone level and 285/65r18 BFG KO2's. Plan on switching to boss or fox coil overs at some point

 

That color looks awesome! is that the pepperdust? I think you should try to find a set of GMC A/T wheels like I have on my truck. The dark gray pockets on the wheel would look so sick with that colorway.

corncob Enthusiast

corncob

Posted
Posted

 

That color looks awesome! is that the pepperdust? I think you should try to find a set of GMC A/T wheels like I have on my truck. The dark gray pockets on the wheel would look so sick with that colorway.

I've thought about trying to find some A/T wheels to go with Pepperdust truck, but the dang offset/BS is what holds me back.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Travis1024 Enthusiast

Travis1024

Posted
Posted

I've thought about trying to find some A/T wheels to go with Pepperdust truck, but the dang offset/BS is what holds me back.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yeah i'm going through it now with my 33x12.50s rubbing pretty bad on my stamped UCAs at about 80% to full lock. Absolutely love the wheels and want to keep them, but looks like the only option I really have would be hubcentric wheel spacers.

corncob Enthusiast

corncob

Posted
Posted

 

Yeah i'm going through it now with my 33x12.50s rubbing pretty bad on my stamped UCAs at about 80% to full lock. Absolutely love the wheels and want to keep them, but looks like the only option I really have would be hubcentric wheel spacers.

Yep, that's my concern. That and I would actually prefer 18's over 20's. I like the thicker sidewalk look.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Travis1024 Enthusiast

Travis1024

Posted
Posted

Yep, that's my concern. That and I would actually prefer 18's over 20's. I like the thicker sidewalk look.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

just do 20s and 35s instead of an 18s and 33s :P. honestly, if you did a narrower tire, I don't think it would be quite as bad but would definitely still rub a little

corncob Enthusiast

corncob

Posted
Posted

 

just do 20s and 35s instead of an 18s and 33s :P. honestly, if you did a narrower tire, I don't think it would be quite as bad but would definitely still rub a little

I rubbed quite a bit on my '09, I would like to avoid that on new '17. It drove me nuts.

 

I also don't think 35's would work, unless they were 10" width and then they would still rub on the liner.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Travis1024 Enthusiast

Travis1024

Posted
Posted

I rubbed quite a bit on my '09, I would like to avoid that on new '17. It drove me nuts.

 

I also don't think 35's would work, unless they were 10" width and then they would still rub on the liner.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

yeah Yeah ive seen people stuff 35s on the 2014+ leveled but it requires a good amount of trimming - I'll pass on that....Not worth butchering a new truck for 2 extra inches of rubber.....

longley425 New Member

longley425

Posted
Posted

Hi guys I am new here and been reading this thread this for awhile. I have a 2017 SLT all terrain and was hopping to do the RC 2.5" kit but once I realized that the top spacer goes in the coil instead of the over the strut on the 2017 models I decided against it. I noticed that motofab makes a couple of different options for a 2.5" level kit. I was wondering if anyone has used this kit http://www.motofablifts.com/product-p/ch-25lm.htm ? I also find it weird that rough country makes you conform what control arms you have for there leveling kits but motofab does not? Also I have not found anyone else that makes a 2.5" bottom mount level besides motofab. Is there a benefit from using a 2" spacer on the bottom and a 1/2" on the top instead of just using a 2.5" on the bottom alone? thanks in advance for any help with this!

rawalters117 Enthusiast

rawalters117

Posted
Posted

 

yeah Yeah ive seen people stuff 35s on the 2014+ leveled but it requires a good amount of trimming - I'll pass on that....Not worth butchering a new truck for 2 extra inches of rubber.....

 

With a 2" level, I fit my 305/65/18s with zero trimming and zero rubbing, even at full lock in reverse. They measure 33.7x12.1, and even .1" more, and it would rub. I think I found the absolute limit for size on these new trucks with just a 2".

  • Like 1
corncob Enthusiast

corncob

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

With a 2" level, I fit my 305/65/18s with zero trimming and zero rubbing, even at full lock in reverse. They measure 33.7x12.1, and even .1" more, and it would rub. I think I found the absolute limit for size on these new trucks with just a 2".

More details please.

 

What width wheels? If aftermarket, what offset? And what brand/model tire? Anything else aftermarket, like UCAs or anything?

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by corncob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 403 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...