Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks. I'll have to see what my stock wheel is right now then. I want a lift but overall nothing to crazy.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Good luck with your lift. I've been looking at a 1.5" to 2" level and slightly larger tires. My problem is deciding on using spacers or levelling shocks!

Posted

I'm getting ready to order the Rough Country leveling kit for my '15 Sierra. My friend's husband is a certified mechanic and is giving me a fair deal to install it ($150). I can do some things automotive but suspension is not my expertise nor do I have the tools to do this.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm getting ready to order the Rough Country leveling kit for my '15 Sierra. My friend's husband is a certified mechanic and is giving me a fair deal to install it ($150). I can do some things automotive but suspension is not my expertise nor do I have the tools to do this.

You almost need no tools just a lift and simple tools. And also I don't know if I just got a great deal but the guy charged me $100 for install and I didn't even know him. [emoji23]

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Posted

New guy...have a 16 SIerra All Terrain. Getting a 2in leveling kit and trying to decide what size tires. Looking at 305/50/20 or 285/55/20...opinions?

Posted

Good luck with your lift. I've been looking at a 1.5" to 2" level and slightly larger tires. My problem is deciding on using spacers or levelling shocks!

I hear ya that is about what I am looking to do. I am not looking to get to high off the ground. Just a better stance.

 

I am going with a suspension for sure as everyone says that the oem shocks suck and the aftermarket ones make the ride great. The only issue is the cost.

Posted

New guy...have a 16 SIerra All Terrain. Getting a 2in leveling kit and trying to decide what size tires. Looking at 305/50/20 or 285/55/20...opinions?

 

I'm running 285's and they fit great PLENTY of room on 2 inch level. 305 50's are wider and a hair shorter and I think would fit, but there is a possibility of rubbing. 285's are typically a 10 ply tire compared to the 305 50's which are typically P rated (4 ply).

 

10 ply's stiffen the ride a little, but not too much. All depends on your driving conditions. I love my Hankooks

Posted

I hear ya that is about what I am looking to do. I am not looking to get to high off the ground. Just a better stance.

 

I am going with a suspension for sure as everyone says that the oem shocks suck and the aftermarket ones make the ride great. The only issue is the cost.

I would use caution when changing shocks because "everyone" says oem sucks. People with good experiences don't tend to complain. This is my fifth gm pickup (following several Fords) and never had to replace a stock gm shock. I have been reading similar information where it is said the quality of shocks like Bilsteins are better, but I have also read that the use of spring compression to lift your truck reduces suspension travel. Using a bottom of strut spacer may be the most effective, easiest to install. and least expensive option.

Posted

I would use caution when changing shocks because "everyone" says oem sucks. People with good experiences don't tend to complain. This is my fifth gm pickup (following several Fords) and never had to replace a stock gm shock. I have been reading similar information where it is said the quality of shocks like Bilsteins are better, but I have also read that the use of spring compression to lift your truck reduces suspension travel. Using a bottom of strut spacer may be the most effective, easiest to install. and least expensive option.

Thanks for the input. Do you that because people extend the shock all the way in order to level it that causes the suspension travel to shorten?

 

I was looking into a bds 4inch suspension kit. Or maybe just a icon set to level the truck a bit. It's all on the drawing board really at this point.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks for the input. Do you that because people extend the shock all the way in order to level it that causes the suspension travel to shorten?

 

I was looking into a bds 4inch suspension kit. Or maybe just a icon set to level the truck a bit. It's all on the drawing board really at this point.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

I definitely have no expertise in this area but am trying to gather as much information as available because I can't afford the trial and error method! My understanding is that there is a direct correlation between the amount you compress your springs (preload) to the reduction in suspension travel. If you use a small spacer (providing less than 2 inches of lift) your stock suspension components such as shock absorbers will not be over extended

Posted

Put on a 2" leveling kit yesterday on my 2016 ..

 

Before:

 

 

 

 

After:

 

Did you do the rear block too or just the front? spacer on shock tower?

Posted

Did you do the rear block too or just the front? spacer on shock tower?

Just front spacer.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

2.5" rough country leveling kit. Didnt use the rear block that came with it. Still has .5" rake but also has a ranch hand on the front.post-155891-0-53237300-1458932867_thumb.jpg

post-155891-0-53237300-1458932867_thumb.jpg

post-155891-0-53237300-1458932867_thumb.jpg

post-155891-0-53237300-1458932867_thumb.jpg

Edited by jsouth
Posted

Got some fresh pics of the his and hers haha

 

post-143469-145894954145_thumb.jpg

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

post-143469-145894954145_thumb.jpg

post-143469-145894954145_thumb.jpg

post-143469-145894954145_thumb.jpg

Posted

Any of you guys have any shortcuts or pointers on installing the lower blocks of the RC 2.5 level? Didn't find many good quality videos. This kit, as bad as I hate to say it, kicked my a$$ tonight! I got the top spacers in but I pretty much did everything short of disassembling the whole entire front end tonight.

 

After spending a few hours doing my AMP Research steps, I decided to tackle the level also... Now I wish I hadn't! I am admitting defeat and bowing out gracefully! I'm not new to suspension work, but its mostly been limited to coilovers on sports cars, never any lifts or levels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It's official. Chevy pulled the covers off the next-gen 2027 Silverado 1500, and we got the first official look.   Full breakdown here: https://www.gm-trucks.com/2027-chevrolet-silverado-official-first-look-specs/   The quick hits: LT is dead. The new core trim is just called "Silverado." Two new V8s, a 5.7L and a 6.6L. No horsepower or torque numbers yet. The 2.7 TurboMax finally gets the 10-speed. ZR2 moves to standard 35s with front and rear lockers. Over 60 inches of dash display on ZR2 and High Country, passenger screen included. Seven trims, three lifted from the factory: ZR2, Trail Boss, and a new Custom Trail Boss.   So let's get into it: 5.7 and 6.6 instead of holding out for a 6.7. Right call? Killing the LT name after all these years: bold, or a mistake? Does the new look land for you, or is it too safe? No power numbers at reveal. Smart tease, or frustrating? What are you ordering on day one?   Drop your first impressions below. 
    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...