Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

ChrisTronyxYocum Enthusiast

ChrisTronyxYocum

Posted
Posted

I have a 2016 and I'm not sure whether I'd need the aluminum or steel version of the RC 2.5" kit. Is this just a preference or does it matter on what your truck is actually using for the stock control arms? Sorry if this is a noobie question, but I just got the truck and am still learning.

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

Aldila Enthusiast

Aldila

Posted
Posted

I have a 2016 and I'm not sure whether I'd need the aluminum or steel version of the RC 2.5" kit. Is this just a preference or does it matter on what your truck is actually using for the stock control arms? Sorry if this is a noobie question, but I just got the truck and am still learning.

It's important. You use the kit that matches which controls arms your truck is equipped with, steel or aluminum.

  • Like 1
ChrisTronyxYocum Enthusiast

ChrisTronyxYocum

Posted
Posted

It's important. You use the kit that matches which controls arms your truck is equipped with, steel or aluminum.

 

That's what I thought, but wasn't entirely sure, thanks. Unless someone can tell me, I guess I'll grab a magnet and climb under the truck.

Aldila Enthusiast

Aldila

Posted
Posted

That's what I thought, but wasn't entirely sure, thanks. Unless someone can tell me, I guess I'll grab a magnet and climb under the truck.

I've had a 14, 15, and now a 16. The black arms have been steel and silver were aluminum from my experience.

  • Like 1
wheezy Enthusiast

wheezy

Posted
Posted

anyone know what the 2015 1500 high country has for control arms, id go look but im deployed ;( and id like to order the kit prior to being home

ChrisTronyxYocum Enthusiast

ChrisTronyxYocum

Posted
Posted

I've had a 14, 15, and now a 16. The black arms have been steel and silver were aluminum from my experience.

 

Awesome, thanks!

Big Whiskey Senior Enthusiast

Big Whiskey

Posted
Posted

 

That's what I thought, but wasn't entirely sure, thanks. Unless someone can tell me, I guess I'll grab a magnet and climb under the truck.

Yep, the magnet test is pretty full-proof, haha.

  • Like 1
Perseus Enthusiast

Perseus

Posted
Posted

Not the best, but at least it's not in the driveway. I love the final product.

 

9b33d60907503869567497bb2c315723.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

820.jpeg

  • Like 2
Frecks10 Enthusiast

Frecks10

Posted
Posted

anyone here running a Toyo 33x12.5/20r open country m/t with just a 2.25 level? I ordered my rims recently and trying to size the biggest tire i can squeeze on. Rims have a +20 offset so pretty close to stock.

Lgetz Senior Enthusiast

Lgetz

Posted
Posted

anyone here running a Toyo 33x12.5/20r open country m/t with just a 2.25 level? I ordered my rims recently and trying to size the biggest tire i can squeeze on. Rims have a +20 offset so pretty close to stock.

 

Haven't put on tires on the 15 yet but have seen trucks with a 2 inch level running 33's on stock wheels. I think you should be fine with that offset with a 9 inch wide wheel on your truck.

Frecks10 Enthusiast

Frecks10

Posted
Posted

Haven't put on tires on the 15 yet but have seen trucks with a 2 inch level running 33's on stock wheels. I think you should be fine with that offset with a 9 inch wide wheel on your truck.

I thought so to as the level kit states you can run a 33" but says a 11.5 max, I want to avoid rubbing at all cost.

A.J._Langholff Enthusiast

A.J._Langholff

Posted
Posted

I just put on a 2 inch RC level on my 15 crew cab happy with it so far about 500 miles on it. For those guys who have 2014 & have had them on for a while is there any negative impact that come directly from having it leveled? Just curious if I should be worried?

 

Sent from my SM-N920R4 using Tapatalk

VinnyZ17 Enthusiast

VinnyZ17

Posted
Posted

anyone here running a Toyo 33x12.5/20r open country m/t with just a 2.25 level? I ordered my rims recently and trying to size the biggest tire i can squeeze on. Rims have a +20 offset so pretty close to stock.

Haven't put on tires on the 15 yet but have seen trucks with a 2 inch level running 33's on stock wheels. I think you should be fine with that offset with a 9 inch wide wheel on your truck.

I thought so to as the level kit states you can run a 33" but says a 11.5 max, I want to avoid rubbing at all cost.

 

I think Laura Buick GMC puts +1 offset 20x9 rims on the trucks that they level with the 2.25in level and run 33x12.5 at tires. I have also seen ppl on here running 295/55/20 (33x12.2) mts on stock rims with 2 or 2.5 levels with no rubbing. With +20 you're gunna be cutting it close.

danno85 Enthusiast

danno85

Posted
Posted

For those with the moto fab 2" level, did it give exactly 2" of lift. Also, where can the top 1/2" spacers be purchased?

 

 

I put on the 2" Level with the 1/2" top spacer this last weekend. It worked out to be a little greater than 2.5" of lift, nearly 3" to the bottom of the fender in the front. I have a '16 CC Sierra with factory wheels, and it currently sits close to level, but back is nearly 3/8"-1/2" higher.

 

One thing to note is that the front end on mine looks a little bit higher in the front because of the profile of the hood compared to the box, so it depends on your goal for the truck. If you're going for looks you may want to go with a 2" leveling kit, but if you're going for tires and want to have more clearance you may want to go with the 2.5" lift.

 

I didn't add anything to the rear yet, I wanted to try the front first and see how that changed things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...