Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

81mmcat Enthusiast

81mmcat

Posted
Posted (edited)

As for the fender liners being different I only see one part no. L and R for the 2014's maybe the older trucks but have doubts about that also

 

Edited by 81mmcat
  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

jaysen Enthusiast

jaysen

Posted
Posted

I'm going to install my procomp 2.25" leveling kit this weekend (upper and lower strut spacer). Any special considerations I should be aware of... Or tips that might ease the process...

 

Videos? Etc... Thanks in advance!

 

 

 

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk

dking020 Enthusiast

dking020

Posted
Posted

f20fc15affb35fe9eb6848fc512db7cc.jpgd258adc0d99f1542d280f1d6d58ff7ac.jpg9c67fcd2ae0b1bb27bf0a4bd951f69d3.jpgc17fcccf059937a6c16e1e4254254915.jpg1d13fee93945c95b77dac2490f9cc0b7.jpg

Sweet setup man. Did you pick up these wheels online? I've been pricing some out, and aboiut to pull the trigger.

rob02021 Enthusiast

rob02021

Posted
Posted

I feel like a kid on Christmas morning! Her she is. 2 inch level. BMF REPR 20 inch. Dick Ceepek fun country 305/55/20. I have a slight rub on the felt liner( I want to zip tie and would love some advice on where you attach it to) and a little on the plastic ( would love some advice as well)

4aeaa4d3040f9889a88f71155da6987b.jpg2a83772ff672ce7aea8d358aa1695ca6.jpg28ee2fb3731ee8b12a3fb8fcc8cb7e64.jpg2be7ac8631d54710748e53e9f2ea5738.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

I feel like a kid on Christmas morning! Her she is. 2 inch level. BMF REPR 20 inch. Dick Ceepek fun country 305/55/20. I have a slight rub on the felt liner( I want to zip tie and would love some advice on where you attach it to) and a little on the plastic ( would love some advice as well)

4aeaa4d3040f9889a88f71155da6987b.jpg2a83772ff672ce7aea8d358aa1695ca6.jpg28ee2fb3731ee8b12a3fb8fcc8cb7e64.jpg2be7ac8631d54710748e53e9f2ea5738.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What offset? 0? It looks great man!

ddanis60 Enthusiast

ddanis60

Posted
Posted

I've spent a week slowly reading through every page and post. lots of awesome looking trucks. I've made my mind up on some 275/70/18 Grabber AT-2's for my double cab lt stock wheels and fully planned on doing the rc 2" front only level. I know the tires would easily fit with the level, but i think I read somewhere in here that they might fit without? As i was reading, I hadn't made up my mind on what i wanted to do yet, but i don't feel like reading though all that again! Any input of this would be greatly appreciated.

 

I'd love not to alter the suspension at all but if I have to, it outweighs how much i don't want 265/65/18's and the sr-a's have to go soon.

Cajun Phil Enthusiast

Cajun Phil

Posted
Posted

I leveled my 2014 Sierra Z71 SLE Double Cab with 2.25 inch Skyjacker kit. I still have 17" factory rims but swapped out the 265 tires with Mackey Thompson STZ Baja LT285/70R17. Looks great and no rub issue.

Sermed Enthusiast

Sermed

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just ordered RC 1303 2.5in Suspension lift

I already have 275 70 R18 Copper AT 3, cant wait to install and share the results with you guys.

As i live in Dubai it will take 8 to 10 days for it to reach to me.

Edited by Sermed
  • Like 1
cccritch Enthusiast

cccritch

Posted
Posted

So I ordered the 2.5" Rough Country leveling kit for my 2015 Silverado. The leveling kit arrived today. When I opened the kit everything seemed to be there and exactly what expected. However, when I opened the separate box for the lower strut spacer the spacers look different than what I was expecting. The lower strut spacer that is pictured in the following link is what came with my kit (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1307-8.html) and I was expecting the lower strut spacer that is pictured in the this link (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-suspension-lift-kit-1303.html). Is one spacer better than the other or does it even matter. Let me know what you guys think.

 

Sorry for the links and not pictures. I haven't spent the time to figure out which is the best way to attach pictures.

Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

So I ordered the 2.5" Rough Country leveling kit for my 2015 Silverado. The leveling kit arrived today. When I opened the kit everything seemed to be there and exactly what expected. However, when I opened the separate box for the lower strut spacer the spacers look different than what I was expecting. The lower strut spacer that is pictured in the following link is what came with my kit (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1307-8.html) and I was expecting the lower strut spacer that is pictured in the this link (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-suspension-lift-kit-1303.html). Is one spacer better than the other or does it even matter. Let me know what you guys think.

 

Sorry for the links and not pictures. I haven't spent the time to figure out which is the best way to attach pictures.

 

 

I would not think that it would matter. Both look to be basically the same thing. Just one looks like it would work better for advertising purposes. If you would rather the spacers that you thought you ordered then email Rough Country or call them and have them send the correct ones. If you are not worried since they will both do the same job and you won't be seeing them all the time, then I wouldn't worry about it

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

So I ordered the 2.5" Rough Country leveling kit for my 2015 Silverado. The leveling kit arrived today. When I opened the kit everything seemed to be there and exactly what expected. However, when I opened the separate box for the lower strut spacer the spacers look different than what I was expecting. The lower strut spacer that is pictured in the following link is what came with my kit (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1307-8.html) and I was expecting the lower strut spacer that is pictured in the this link (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-suspension-lift-kit-1303.html). Is one spacer better than the other or does it even matter. Let me know what you guys think.

 

Sorry for the links and not pictures. I haven't spent the time to figure out which is the best way to attach pictures.

 

The one you received just looks to be maybe an older style or design. What does the materials feel like? The ones you expected isn't plastic, but feels kind of like a plastic. As said, it looks like it does the same thing and the fitment guide for it says it fits from 07-present 1500s so it should fit. Maybe someone sent you an older kit.

Whiskey Bent Enthusiast

Whiskey Bent

Posted
Posted

So I ordered the 2.5" Rough Country leveling kit for my 2015 Silverado. The leveling kit arrived today. When I opened the kit everything seemed to be there and exactly what expected. However, when I opened the separate box for the lower strut spacer the spacers look different than what I was expecting. The lower strut spacer that is pictured in the following link is what came with my kit (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1307-8.html) and I was expecting the lower strut spacer that is pictured in the this link (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-suspension-lift-kit-1303.html). Is one spacer better than the other or does it even matter. Let me know what you guys think.

Sorry for the links and not pictures. I haven't spent the time to figure out which is the best way to attach pictures.

2nd link isn't working. But the first link is what the lower spacer is supposed to look like. Looking up the 1303 kit in the second link I saw is the 2.5" kit so maybe your talking about the top strut spacer? It's kind of like a triangle with rounded sides more or less.

Whiskey Bent Enthusiast

Whiskey Bent

Posted
Posted

So I ordered the 2.5" Rough Country leveling kit for my 2015 Silverado. The leveling kit arrived today. When I opened the kit everything seemed to be there and exactly what expected. However, when I opened the separate box for the lower strut spacer the spacers look different than what I was expecting. The lower strut spacer that is pictured in the following link is what came with my kit (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-leveling-lift-kit-1307-8.html) and I was expecting the lower strut spacer that is pictured in the this link (http://www.roughcountry.com/gm-suspension-lift-kit-1303.html). Is one spacer better than the other or does it even matter. Let me know what you guys think.

Sorry for the links and not pictures. I haven't spent the time to figure out which is the best way to attach pictures.

2nd link isn't working. But the first link is what the lower spacer is supposed to look like. Looking up the 1303 kit in the second link I saw is the 2.5" kit so maybe your talking about the top strut spacer? It's kind of like a triangle with rounded sides more or less.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • PunchT37
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • SoCal Angler
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By SoCal Angler · Posted

      2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...