Jump to content

pics of my 14

Deconstruction

Recommended Posts

'01LS1 Senior Enthusiast

'01LS1

Posted
Posted

Wrong. I like the stacked headlights. That is what is on my '09 Sierra and I really like it. As for the hoppie, no. and you must have way good drugs to think they look alike.

 

 

I politely disagree. 1. The Chevy looks fine. A lot of people bleed bow tie and will buy Chevy.

 

2. A lot of people will not care for the LED DRLs on the Sierra. Include me on that. If I get the Sierra, I will fuse pull the DRLs. Heck, a new Honda has them and they look weak. I think halos ya, but no to the strip lights.

 

3. There are more Chevy dealers about so easier to get to, to buy and to service.

 

Anyway back on topic. tires look good. No rub even on rough dirt road etc.?? Look into the Bilsteins 5100s for a nose lift that keeps full shock travel and allows the larger tires. Great ride too.

 

For 2. I thought the same thing originally. I do not like the Acadia LED's, they look like a couple of fluorescent shop lights.

But a new Sierra passed me the other day & the single strip stands out & it looked good.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
BringTheRain403 Senior Enthusiast

BringTheRain403

Posted
Posted

I'm not saying that the Sierra will out sell the Silverado. Currently market share from a GM perspective is an 80/20 split in the Silverado's favor. All I'm saying is that if you look at that number in a year the Sierra will have gained ground on the Silverado. Even though most people I know as well as most reviews count the Sierra as being the better looking truck I'm sure the Silverado will have higher sales numbers. I just personally think it's just about the ugliest thing out there in the road when looking at it from the front...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Stex Senior Enthusiast

Stex

Posted
Posted

For 2. I thought the same thing originally. I do not like the Acadia LED's, they look like a couple of fluorescent shop lights.

But a new Sierra passed me the other day & the single strip stands out & it looked good.

 

May have been a little harsh on the DRLs. Have only seen on the lot. Not moving down the road. Will see.

 

I'm not saying that the Sierra will out sell the Silverado. Currently market share from a GM perspective is an 80/20 split in the Silverado's favor. All I'm saying is that if you look at that number in a year the Sierra will have gained ground on the Silverado. Even though most people I know as well as most reviews count the Sierra as being the better looking truck I'm sure the Silverado will have higher sales numbers. I just personally think it's just about the ugliest thing out there in the road when looking at it from the front... Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

U r on. Sept-Aug next yr. Say % sales increase??

 

Deconstruction:

Thanks for the answer on the no-rub.

Firetiger(MN) Enthusiast

Firetiger(MN)

Posted
Posted

Your wrong. :-) Yes they both have stacked low and high beams but that is really the only similarities into opinion.

 

That, and the fact that they're both fugly as hell.

BringTheRain403 Senior Enthusiast

BringTheRain403

Posted
Posted
For 2. I thought the same thing originally. I do not like the Acadia LED's, they look like a couple of fluorescent shop lights.

But a new Sierra passed me the other day & the single strip stands out & it looked good.

 

May have been a little harsh on the DRLs. Have only seen on the lot. Not moving down the road. Will see.

 

I'm not saying that the Sierra will out sell the Silverado. Currently market share from a GM perspective is an 80/20 split in the Silverado's favor. All I'm saying is that if you look at that number in a year the Sierra will have gained ground on the Silverado. Even though most people I know as well as most reviews count the Sierra as being the better looking truck I'm sure the Silverado will have higher sales numbers. I just personally think it's just about the ugliest thing out there in the road when looking at it from the front... Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

U r on. Sept-Aug next yr. Say % sales increase??

 

Deconstruction:

Thanks for the answer on the no-rub.

 

70/30

 

Solely because the Silverado is cheaper and GM markets the living hell out of it. I have yet to see one commercial for the new Sierra. Just sayin...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

EChavez Enthusiast

EChavez

Posted
Posted

Beautiful truck! That would definitely be my color of choice aside from black. It has too many needs haha. I have one question. I know many people won't be trying this but has anyone tried to remove those wheel well plastic moldings? I know they are removable but I'm not sure how it looks with them off? If anyone could post some pictures? I'd love to see them colormatched as well.

Deconstruction Enthusiast

Deconstruction

Posted
  • Author
Posted

not considering any lifts or levels at the moment.

 

Actually that is a lie I might remove my rear block to "level lower" it. If I do I will get some airbags for when its loaded.

 

I will remove my stock fender flare plastic wheel well moulding whatever they are.. when a company makes a set for more tire clearance Ie: bushwacker cut outs.

 

I am still suprised at the quality of paint on this truck!

CorvetteOJ Enthusiast

CorvetteOJ

Posted
Posted

I personally think Chevy has dropped the ball all the way around on the Silverado. I think the Sierra will take a good deal of its business away... Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I have to agree with you 100%! I am currently driving my 3rd Silverado in the last 10 years. When the '14s first came out, I was on the fence between the High Country and the Denali. After reading everything that has been written on both, and reviewing all the pictures available on the internet,...for me, in my opinion, the High Country doesn't measure up to the Denali. I was quite literally on the fence between the two for a couple months, but the Denali with the 6.2 is going to be my next truck as soon as they come available. I am very comfortable with my decision based on all the info available at this time. The Denali is perhaps better suited for me than most, because I am a huge "bling" guy. I always add a lot of chrome, I love the Denali grill and the LED DRLs, that most of you don't like, and I hate to drive mine in the rain, much less use it for a truck! There are still two options missing for me, even on the Denali. That is "Keyless Go," like the Corvette, the Mercedes and the "RAM" has, and the shifter mounted in the console. If I were a designer for GM, those two options would be available on the Denali. I'm sure that's two things that doesn't interest most of you guys. Just another effort to let you know I tend to dance to a drifferent drummer when it comes to my vehicles, especially my truck. I do love this forum. Afterall, it is the only truck forum that even mentions the '14s, much less, has its own section.

MikeNH Senior Enthusiast

MikeNH

Posted
Posted

Yep, you're dead on cause I despise those stupid keyless systems. Power buttons are for computer monitors. Cars and trucks have keys. :lol:

 

I'm less critical of the console shifter. I see it as a waste of space where more bins/cupholders/whatever could be but I wouldn't be totally against it. Just don't like how car-ish it seems.

CorvetteOJ Enthusiast

CorvetteOJ

Posted
Posted

Yep, you're dead on cause I despise those stupid keyless systems. Power buttons are for computer monitors. Cars and trucks have keys. :lol: I'm less critical of the console shifter. I see it as a waste of space where more bins/cupholders/whatever could be but I wouldn't be totally against it. Just don't like how car-ish it seems.

Yes Mike, I understand. I have heard your comment before in regards to the keyless systems, and I can see that. As far as the shifter, I perceive it as adding a sporty flair to the truck. For me, it would help to fill up the console,because there is a lot of wasted console space with all the storage bins and compartments. Once again, I know all that space comes in handy for guys who use the truck as a truck, and especially if they use it for work. I personally can't stand to see anything loose in my vehicle console, or anywhere else in the interior.

 

This is one of the greatest things about the forum. I believe it is fantastic to realsize and understand how folks who appreciate the same type vehicle, but yet have such different and unique tastes, interests, attitudes and values toward it. Being able to share those differences is the one thing that makes a good forum a great forum. Thanks for all you and the other moderators do to allow that to happen.

BringTheRain403 Senior Enthusiast

BringTheRain403

Posted
Posted

I agree 100000% with everything. The console shifter and keyless start should at the very least be options and I would order whatever package was necessary to get them. I like the LED's and big chrome grill as well.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
PETARO Enthusiast

PETARO

Posted
Posted

Some of you wanted pics, well here are a few the gf took of the truck. 2014 Sierra CC 6.5' box. Diamond white tricoat, cocoa dune interior

looks great!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...