Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You had the rare opportunity to have a truly knowledgeable tech to work on yours. Please share the dealer name so others in that area can use them. Wish all techs were as smart, but most are just part swappers, and the service managers/writers are the ones that really don;t understand any of this.

 

Great story!!!

Posted

You had the rare opportunity to have a truly knowledgeable tech to work on yours. Please share the dealer name so others in that area can use them. Wish all techs were as smart, but most are just part swappers, and the service managers/writers are the ones that really don;t understand any of this.

 

Great story!!!

 

As much as I'd like to, I didn't ask permission from him and don't want to have it come back on him.

The difference may be that Chevrolet dealers that sell Corvettes are required to have a Corvette salesman and tech that get factory training on the car -so the rest of the techs would be working on anything that Chevrolet sells including the trucks and may not be as up to date on the DI engine concerns.

Posted (edited)

I've asked this before and I'm not sure if anyone responded. Searching from my phone is a bit difficult but is anyone with an RX can getting oil buildup on the top of the can? It seems to be coming from the inlet hose to the can....seeping past where the hose is attached to the hose barb. It's just enough that after about 600-700 miles there's a thin coating of oil on top of the can and a couple drips down the side. There are no codes or lights in the dash indicating a problem and I'm still draining oil like usual from the can so its working.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

I've asked this before and I'm not sure if anyone responded. Searching from my phone is a bit difficult but is anyone with an RX can getting oil buildup on the top of the can? It seems to be coming from the inlet hose to the can....seeping past where the hose is attached to the hose barb. It's just enough that after about 600-700 miles there's a thin coating of oil on top of the can and a couple drips down the side. There are no codes or lights in the dash indicating a problem and I'm still draining oil like usual from the can so its working.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are your connections wrapped with tape? I know I have heard they leak if not sealed properly

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

Are your connections wrapped with tape? I know I have heard they leak if not sealed properly

 

sent from Florida beech

The original RX design doesn't have connections that need to be wrapped in tape. And the specific connection that is leaking is just a hose barb so there's nothing really to wrap. I do have a hose clamp around it for extra support and I wonder if over time that pressure has messed up the seal maybe. Because it never leaked at first. The only other thing I can think of is that since I switched to synthetic oil, it's properties allow it to seep past it a bit more easily than synthetic blend.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The original RX design doesn't have connections that need to be wrapped in tape. And the specific connection that is leaking is just a hose barb so there's nothing really to wrap. I do have a hose clamp around it for extra support and I wonder if over time that pressure has messed up the seal maybe. Because it never leaked at first. The only other thing I can think of is that since I switched to synthetic oil, it's properties allow it to seep past it a bit more easily than synthetic blend.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I still would wrap the barb connection. Any bit helps. And you are correct synthetic is a less mineral based oil making its viscosity lower

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

I'd snip the end of the hose, and make the connection tighter, by whichever means used to fasten the hose to the barb.

 

I've been running Amsoil since long before I installed my can, and it doesn't leak a drop. I don't even have any clamps on a couple connections.

 

post-65085-0-33384500-1456191360_thumb.jpg

post-65085-0-33384500-1456191360_thumb.jpg

post-65085-0-33384500-1456191360_thumb.jpg

post-65085-0-33384500-1456191360_thumb.jpg

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Just wanted to share this picture of a brand new install on my first GM Truck as I have always driven Ford and Dodge. My son has a 2010 Camaro and we have been kicking around a CTS-V for his 21st birthday. After owning all the Ford and Dodge vehicles that absolutely capture a ton of oil every oil change. Ton = 3-5 ounces at every dump in the hot months and 7-8 ounces or more in the winter months.

 

I've just completed this full bolt-on system and wanted to see how everyone likes it. ( This is a Plug n Play Setup )

 

14-17-gm-chevrolet-gmc-trucks-5-3l-dual-

 

Here is an installed shot from the manufacturer website.

 

14-17-gm-chevrolet-gmc-trucks-5-3l-dual-

I am looking forward to becoming a vendor and to be a part of the community.

Cheers everyone.

Email: [email protected]

If any moderators are on please contact me about becoming a vendor and getting our own forum. We

would like to get signed up right away if possible.

Thank you, Joe

Edited by JoeCCS
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Just wanted to share this picture of a brand new install on my first GM Truck as I have always driven Ford and Dodge. My son has a 2010 Camaro and we have been kicking around a CTS-V for his 21st birthday. After owning all the Ford and Dodge vehicles that absolutely capture a ton of oil every oil change. Ton = 3-5 ounces at every dump in the hot months and 7-8 ounces or more in the winter months.

 

I've just completed this full bolt-on system and wanted to see how everyone likes it. ( This is a Plug n Play Setup )

 

14-17-gm-chevrolet-gmc-trucks-5-3l-dual-

 

Here is an installed shot from the manufacturer website.

 

14-17-gm-chevrolet-gmc-trucks-5-3l-dual-

I am looking forward to becoming a vendor and to be a part of the community.

Cheers everyone.

Email: [email protected]

If any moderators are on please contact me about becoming a vendor and getting our own forum. We

would like to get signed up right away if possible.

Thank you, Joe

Nice job, Joe. Why are there couplings in some of the hoses?

Edited by Terp84Alum
Posted

Where did you get the idea to use a WOT suction and a cleanside separator?

There are few ways to deal with the problem of pressure differentials at WOT. A basic understanding of physics could lead most people to the obvious solution for manging gas flow at WOT. Most plumbers could look at a PCV system and know where check valves need to be and how the sysem works for a given throttle position.

 

It's nice to see competitors in the air-oil sep market. Don't get me wrong, my Elite CC is great, but the pricing is absurd. The price tag is out of control for the E2-X system. Ridiculous (sickening) mark-up for such a product.

Posted

There are few ways to deal with the problem of pressure differentials at WOT. A basic understanding of physics could lead most people to the obvious solution for manging gas flow at WOT. Most plumbers could look at a PCV system and know where check valves need to be and how the sysem works for a given throttle position.

 

It's nice to see competitors in the air-oil sep market. Don't get me wrong, my Elite CC is great, but the pricing is absurd. The price tag is out of control for the E2-X system. Ridiculous (sickening) mark-up for such a product.

The question was for Joe from UPR as before a customer of his did the "catchcan test" and they failed miserably, he always promoted his (made by Billet Prototypes like the Moroso) was the best. He then copied the RX dual valve and also copied the explanations of RX on how all of this worked. (the RX is priced less I believe than the UPR) after sending RX this nasty message: " If you continue to use and show my products as being faulty or not as good as yours I will have your can manufactured in billet to be a quality item ! Them proceed to sell all your dealers with my endless source of supplies." So, before that, RX was the ONLY can that understood this and shared this information. Using someone else years of hard work and research to copy is less than ethical. Same with the "cleanside separator" that RX was the first and only to use, then UPR copied it as well:

 

Read the entire test here:

 

http://www.f150forum.com/f70/5-0-upr-vs-rx-catch-can-effectiveness-test-254381/

 

And, here is a challenge. Perform that same test but with the E2-X against the can in the pictures Joe posted here, and the E2-X comes out on top.

 

That was the only point of my post.

 

Most ethical companies will work with an inventor/designer to have them license the design, or have them private labeled from the inventor. Comapnies that just copy others to short cut all the expense and years of R&D are what is wrong with business today.

 

DSCN1598_zpsdmqhpyit.jpg

 

These were out for months before he copied it. And after you read the nasty letter (he had his customer take the challenge, not RX) this is what is wrong with business today IMHO.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't want to turn this into a price war or Catch Can bashing thread. I always stand behind our pricing. I feel our prices are very competitive with the type of engineering, design, and in-house manufacturing we put into all our products. I also feel we go the extra step in quality and finish of our products. There's a lot of cost in our Catch Cans, and as any successful business knows, there's a lot of costs behind the scenes (forum sponsorship, advertising, marketing, overhead, burden, etc.). We try to price all our items so that we can, on occasion, offer specials, and also support our great dealers. It doesn't benefit any successful business to to have grossly elevated margins.

 

 

 

 

Posted

My vote goes to Elite! They answered my questions and sent me a well built product. All the parts and pieces were quality and I still have not seen a catch can that can match it! Thanks Elite!

  • Like 1
Posted

My vote goes to Elite! They answered my questions and sent me a well built product. All the parts and pieces were quality and I still have not seen a catch can that can match it! Thanks Elite!

 

 

We thank you!

 

:thumbs:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 413 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...