Jump to content

Does new 5.3 burn oil?


bogeypro

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2014 that i just bought with 23k on it...it burned 3&1/2 gts in 2200 miles...took it in 5 times for oil consumption test and now they are saying the low tension rings arr bad...they are supposedly in the process of putting new rings and pistons in a truck that only has 35k on it....my 99' sierra has 225k on ot and wont burn a 1/2qt in 7k.....pretty sad

Just curious if anyone has driven enough yet to notice if there are any oil consumption issues...Sent from my HTC One mini using Tapatalk 4

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Naah. This is the new norm in the automotive industry now. Low tension rings to get better fuel economy and primarily on direct injection engines = more oil consumption. Yes the oil consumption does happen on non-DI engines as well but very noticeable on DI engines. Add to that the EGR crap as well.

Posted

My 2014 Sierra 5.3L burned through 4 qtrs in 7k miles, at 34k miles and didn't have a clue. Now I'm at 45k miles and I'm burning between 1-2 qts every 3k miles and the dealer is telling it's normal.

Posted

My 2014 Sierra 5.3L burned through 4 qtrs in 7k miles, at 34k miles and didn't have a clue. Now I'm at 45k miles and I'm burning between 1-2 qts every 3k miles and the dealer is telling it's normal.

Well it is! As sucky as that is.

Posted

Well, then my 5.3 must be defective because there is no oil consumption between 7,500 mile OCIs

 

 

Well it is! As sucky as that is.

 

Posted

No, it's not defective. It happens on some and on some it does not happen. And you can argue that to the dealer and manufacturer until you are blue in the face and it won't make a difference. It happens.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I dont know if anybody has the miles to tell yet. They say with new engines you might get some new burn off. I have a nasty feeling thats why GM has an 8.5qt oil pan now.

When I see how GM tends to "fix" things nowadays, maybe they will go to a 22 quart engine oil capacity next just to be on the safe side. After all, that's what the old military deuce a half trucks have.

Posted

Naah. This is the new norm in the automotive industry now. Low tension rings to get better fuel economy and primarily on direct injection engines = more oil consumption. Yes the oil consumption does happen on non-DI engines as well but very noticeable on DI engines. Add to that the EGR crap as well.

They are using EGR valves again? I do not think my 2006 Silverado 5.3 engine has one of those.

Posted

I have 22K miles on my truck and it doesn't burn any oil at all. I drive it hard, especially on break-in. Every vehicle I've ever seen that was broken-in "easy" burns at least a quart of oil over 5k miles. Only solution is to replace the rings / hone the cylinder.

 

The rings need to seat/wear up against the cylinder wall and the first 100 miles is critical. This process should involve varying the RPM (no constant RPM) and having load on the rings. Constant Acceleration and Deceleration provide the best load on the rings. Make sure this is on a warmed up engine (doesn't have to be fully warmed up, 120-135F should be fine).

 

Synthetic oil that comes from the factory is actually bad for ring seating and can cause the cylinder wall to glaze if driven too easy.

 

After about 500 miles do an oil change, don't wait 7.5K for that first oil change. I gradually increased mine (I was lazy and did it at 1000, 6000, 13000, 22000).

 

 

I can't take 100% credit for this information as I based it off of motoman's break-in secrets for small engines and it hasn't failed me yet.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

My 2019 silverado with 30000 miles burns 1 qt every 2000 miles.  Dealer printed me some bs bulletin made 7 months after I purchased it sayin the allowable oil consumption rate in there spec is 1 qt  every 2 thousand miles... it has been a headache goin round and round with them...  I've been a chevy owner all my life and never had problem with older models...   is there anything g I can do about this or has any one found a solution to the problem???

Posted

Welcome to the life of Direct Injection engines.  they burn/consume oil.  Yes, 1 quart every 2000 miles is perfectly normal and most manufacturers say acceptable.  If you don't like it, I'd suggest you go look at another brand that doesn't make a direct injection engine. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looking up on the web you can the information that would seem obvious. You asked engine components to do more. You get more wear. The answer is they can last just as long but required more maintenance. Apparently having to change lifters, cam and associated components are maintenance or repairs. In some research the normal life span of valve train components are 80-100 miles with 3-5K miles oil change. So the next logical conclusion would be cost per mile. I use that analogy with my wife all the time with vehicles. My Odyssey is approaching 170K. The cost per mile will go up at 200K with maintenance. Looking at a low cost car. A K-4 with a 10-10 warranty. Selling my Ridgeline that’s about to hit the same maintenance milestone. My argument becomes not only I get worry free driving. But at no cost increases. Because I take the money from my Ridgeline and maintenance savings and other potential savings. I’m driving for free. So tying it with a bow. It makes you wonder. Is this a grand conspiracy by the auto makers? Raise the potential maintenance high enough. Buyers by extended warranty to 100K miles. Do the minimum maintenance required. Trade in at the warranty end. How long should they last? That question is what keeps people up at night. The answer is much more complicated than it used to be.
    • Could you cite your source on this?  I cannot find any reference to the US secretly taking the oil.  I find references that the US helped oil tankers move through the Strait of Hormuz, but nothing about what you're stating.  
    • Same thought, also the everything doesn't have the details real photos do (talking about the noise in the photo)
    • Since the media YOU and your buddies are programmed to watch failed to mention this, I'll fill you in.   Trump admitted today that we've grabbed 150 MILLION barrels of oil from the Iranian tankers locked in the Strait by our Navy. We turned off their transponders, took them out to sea in the dark of night since they have zero radar capabilities anymore, offloaded every drop onto another vessel, and put them back by morning so no one was the wiser. That oil has been en-route THROUGHOUT the entire conflict.   Main reason he admitted this is to let even guys on our own side who joined leftists in complaining about the prices that he hears us all, and has taken steps to make sure this didn't spiral into a BAD situation ... just like the mainstream media has been PRAYING would happen, just so they could gloat. Amazes me how these people are rooting for the destruction of THEIR OWN HOME, just to make a President they don't agree with or like look bad! That's next level TDS!   I know your not capable of giving our President the benefit of the doubt, again due to your deep programming, but THIS is why oil never hit $150 a barrel as predicted by your programmers, AND the reason oil continues falling. Like I said before, Trump's got a plan, and this is proof of it. By the end of his term, we're going to be in GREAT shape for a change!   Since I just spent $3,000 this week on #2 heating oil and gasoline, the war most certainly is ending! 🤣   https://mxmnews.com/article/ba359ac9-2711-4851-92de-187f2400f2dd?breaking-trump-cancels-iran-strikes-deal-now-approved-by-all-parties
    • No leaks. Replaced the condenser 3 years ago. Problem was found to be caused by the A/C blend door actuator. Just replaced it and it's blowing out the cold air it used to when I bought it. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...