Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here's my 2014 SLT 6.2 and my 2011 SLT 6.2. Got tired of waiting for my max tow 6.2. Love it so far.post-123886-0-08504900-1385600451_thumb.jpg

post-123886-0-08504900-1385600451_thumb.jpg

post-123886-0-08504900-1385600451_thumb.jpg

post-123886-0-08504900-1385600451_thumb.jpg

Edited by dlockwood26
  • Like 1
Posted

Here are some updated pictures with the N-Fab Bars installed. If you are considering any step bars or light bars N-Fab is the way to go. They fit perfect, the welds are excellent, and the paint quality is terrific as well. There is no comparison to the oversized factory bars.

 

http://n-fab.com

 

DSC_0007_zps45baad59.jpg

 

DSC_0005_zpsc335c15f-1.jpg

 

DSC_0004_zpsf32ac25a-1.jpg

 

DSC_0002_zps71c25d77.jpg

 

DSC_0010_zpsca245c74-1.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

denali7-1.jpg

 

I guess I have kinda, sorta broke the code. I'm sure I still don't have it right because this is currently a seriously painstaking process to get the picture from photobucket to the forum. Either case, this is my 6.2 Denali. I took delivery on Nov. 7th and have made numerous mods since.

  • Like 3
Posted

denali4.jpg

 

Here's one more. I'm done! Next time, I'll be able to post pics all in the same post. These were experiments. Sorry for the three separate posts but that was the best I could do today.

  • Like 1
Posted

Mine with all the latest additions.

Color matched mudflaps

Weathertech window visors

Chrome grill

Bowties plasti dipped

 

Future:

Full exhaust

Tune

Under seat storage box (should be here today)

 

IMG_0403_zpsf51744da.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Hey can you post pics of your Katzkin leather back seats? Thanks. I appreciate it.

pretty crummy pic, but they look exactly like the fronts

 

photo-3_zpsa84840e1.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Here a quick picture of my loaner Sierra while I wait for mine to be done. I get to do all the things I would never do with my own truck with this thing and it takes it all.

 

IMG_0823.JPG

Posted

New to the forum, here is my 2014 Silverado LTZ Crew Cab 2WD, Fully Loaded. Silver Ice Metallic with black perforated leather seats. So far I've swapped out the oem chrome mesh to a black oem mesh grille, I have color matched handles I need to install and I've done a little debadging. Getting 5% tint and a bed liner next week, lowering shackles to level the rear. I'm really wanting to find pricing on an OEM GMC All Terrain Rear Bumper without the steps, but have had no luck so far.

 

8C8BEABB-9601-4544-887E-047ADAD57A1D_zpsgotrovce.jpg

 

EE28EDE1-0297-4825-934C-4A511D467A87_zps8yndcgjn.jpg

 

6E41C69C-FC60-4A70-ACC8-6EAA01C296DD_zpsl3wbisqu.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...