Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks! I took "after" measurments with the taller tires on as well. I replaced the 1" factory blocks in the rear with 2" blocks. Getting ready to change out the Ranchos for some adjustable Bilstien 5100s all the way around. Gonna try to raise up the front just a tad more too.

Literally pretty much exactly what i want to do. I've got a 1.25 inch front spacer now and I plan on doing the Bilsteins on the 3rd of 4 height settings giving me an additional 1.25ish. Not as happy as i thought with only 1.25 inches of lift......

post-160004-0-29289100-1476203541_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-29289100-1476203541_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-29289100-1476203541_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-29289100-1476203541_thumb.jpg

Posted

Basic bitch, still deciding on 22x12 on 35s or 20s and 7-9' mcgaughy lift

 

DTgzQFC.jpg

 

looks good

Posted

Can someone with a Summit White '16 or '17 give me their paint code off their glovebox??

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Just installed 20x10 Hostile Sprockets with Atturo Trailblade XTs

 

IMG_1781_zpsjmchez4p.jpg

 

IMG_1773_zpsnw8boixm.jpg

 

looks good

  • Like 1
Posted

Basic bitch, still deciding on 22x12 on 35s or 20s and 7-9' mcgaughy lift

 

DTgzQFC.jpg

What's your current set up? And how do you Like those tires?

 

 

- Mike

IG: @BlackPearl_Edition

Posted

Just installed 20x10 Hostile Sprockets with Atturo Trailblade XTs

 

IMG_1781_zpsjmchez4p.jpg

 

IMG_1773_zpsnw8boixm.jpg

 

good choice :)

  • Like 1
Posted

OK, 2.5 level in front. 1" in rear. 305/55r20.

Before Front 37 1/4" Rear 40 1/4" (to the line on my fender flares)

After Front 40 3/8" Rear 42 3/16"

 

 

 

Ah man, this is my exact truck (minus the level and bigger tires). Any issues with those 305's on the stock wheels? How's the ride and MPG's....

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

What's it set at? 7? I'm ordering that lift maybe today

 

Got any side pics

Set at 8", supposed to be level at 8, i measured around 2" low in the rear, but i carry over 1,000# of gear everyday. With 12" wide, youre gonna need to go above 9"to avoid rubbing

Posted (edited)

Harvest time

 

89428557-3815-4B4B-8061-8A730DA1B83C_zps

Edited by roundsy
  • Like 5
Posted

New to the forum, got this 2016 SLE All Terrain back in March. Not much in the way of mods going to happen as i'm leasing it...but maybe a few items besides the tonneau cover as i'm currently looking for side steps. I do love the truck though, so most likely going to buy it out after the lease term. Just love the looks of the GMC over any other truck right now.

 

post-163898-0-08259000-1476322617_thumb.jpg

Posted

Whats your setup any rubbing?

2.5" level

22x11 fuel hostage -24 offset

33/12.50/22 toyo mt

 

Rub in reverse around 3/4 lock

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...