Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Had the dealer install GM flat splash guards during my recent oil change and tire rotation.

 

post-160111-0-23002900-1485714416_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-11589600-1485714425_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-05524000-1485714433_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-71073600-1485714621_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-35323900-1485714782_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-23002900-1485714416_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-11589600-1485714425_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-05524000-1485714433_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-71073600-1485714621_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-35323900-1485714782_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-23002900-1485714416_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-11589600-1485714425_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-05524000-1485714433_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-71073600-1485714621_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-35323900-1485714782_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-23002900-1485714416_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-11589600-1485714425_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-05524000-1485714433_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-71073600-1485714621_thumb.jpg

post-160111-0-35323900-1485714782_thumb.jpg

Edited by Powhatan
Posted

Here is our 2014 Z71 2WD SLE CC. It has a RC 2" level kit, chrome door mouldings, door handle, and mirror caps. Also just upgraded the wheels from the stock 18" ers to SLT polished 20's.

post-167711-0-84513300-1485719332_thumb.jpg

post-167711-0-84513300-1485719332_thumb.jpg

post-167711-0-84513300-1485719332_thumb.jpg

post-167711-0-84513300-1485719332_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Here is our 2014 Z71 2WD SLE CC. It has a RC 2" level kit, chrome door mouldings, door handle, and mirror caps. Also just upgraded the wheels from the stock 18" ers to SLT polished 20's.

 

 

2WD Z71? I have one of those as well. Strange isn't it?

Posted

2WD Z71? I have one of those as well. Strange isn't it?

 

A little considering growing up I always considered the Z71 was like the Cadillac of trucks and thought they were all 4X4's.

 

This is my late father in laws truck. He didn't like how the 4wd's rode hence the 2wd. He added the Z71 Off-road decals to the bed sides.

Posted

A little considering growing up I always considered the Z71 was like the Cadillac of trucks and thought they were all 4X4's.

 

This is my late father in laws truck. He didn't like how the 4wd's rode hence the 2wd. He added the Z71 Off-road decals to the bed sides.

 

 

Mine actually came with the Z71 package. Really weird. I only wanted a 2WD, and they had three of these on the lot with the Z71 package. I had never heard of such a thing!

Posted

This was an actual Z71 also. He just added the decals on the bed. There are the original Z71 emblems on the fenders.

 

 

 

Mine actually came with the Z71 package. Really weird. I only wanted a 2WD, and they had three of these on the lot with the Z71 package. I had never heard of such a thing!

Posted

Just one more lol

I was gonna ask for another anyway! Nice choice of rims - quite unique!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here's mine from a couple days ago.

ce65d8e4-5378-479c-b8c3-c5b6329491ee.jpg

Any suggestions for wheels? Thinking about some Methods.

Edited by tyrich88
  • Like 1
Posted

Here's mine from a couple days ago.

ce65d8e4-5378-479c-b8c3-c5b6329491ee.jpg

Any suggestions for wheels? Thinking about some Methods.

Method The Standard, Double Standard or Mesh all look great.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

2014 gmc sierra all terrain

305/55/20 cooper zeon ltz

20x10 with -24 offset rockstar rims

Bushwaker fender flares

Amp research power steps

5" rcx suspension lift

ABEC7721-7C47-4639-B82A-BE0359816F20.jpg

 

Are you happy with the Rockstar rims? I've read a few different reviews and I've only come across your setup with them. I'm looking at a different set...The XD811 but they are similar and was curious how they have lasted over the past few years. Thanks!

 

https://www.tirerack.com/wheels/WheelCloseUpServlet?target=runWheelSearch&initialPartNumber=XD81129067712NB&wheelMake=KMC%20XD%20Series&wheelModel=XD811%20Rockstar%20II&wheelFinish=Black%20Painted&showRear=no&autoMake=Chevrolet&autoModel=Silverado+1500+2wd&autoYear=2014&autoModClar=Crew+Cab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...