Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This his how she looks now after two years of owning her. RC level kit up front with the LTZ rims. Looking for a slightly higher lift now since shocks need to be replaced. 

B82923EE-1BEC-42F9-936F-AC227C2870D5.jpeg

Posted (edited)

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT  4.3L V6

20181220_012014.jpg

Edited by Melvin65
Add corrected photo
Posted

I have had the truck for a week 9f1c459df3754010899fd3d9d9f4ecc6.jpg40a30def3e3c59c0dca69a442c21826e.jpg44859810b08b87cde2b5a104c8a1a76d.jpg

Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Here's my 2018 LT - first thing i did was install a Rough Country leveling kit and some BFG's.  I'm very happy with the way it turned out.

20181219_122428.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
I have had the truck for a week 9f1c459df3754010899fd3d9d9f4ecc6.jpg40a30def3e3c59c0dca69a442c21826e.jpg44859810b08b87cde2b5a104c8a1a76d.jpg

Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk




Like the tow mirrors
Posted

Thanks all I need to do know is order the harnesses from Phil

Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
What size tires are those and what type of lift do you have?  Also, how did you go about getting rid of the chrome?  I have the same truck but an 18 and you are setting yours up just how I want mine to look.  Looks great man. 

Nice! Same question as kingofcrate, what lift and tires do u got? I have 3in front 2in rear level/lift was wanting 35x12.5 but only few people say i can run them the majority says 33x12.5,
20181204_165858.thumb.jpg.b01008bc9a7ee1d9cab2b85141f5c65f.jpg



I never got rid of the chrome after all. I could not find a wrap that would match the color 100% and painting chrome is just a pain. For lift I have a 3 inch front spacer and stock rear. Tires are 33x12.50r17s. I ran 35s on stock wheels for a while but went back to 33s on aftermarket wheels. 35s we’re fine on road but rubbed badly offroad. Happy with how it currently sits.

15d0017ee7fcbd5da8f2eb2ce5dabbfc.jpg
  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, 6TEEN5.3 said:

 

 

 


I never got rid of the chrome after all. I could not find a wrap that would match the color 100% and painting chrome is just a pain. For lift I have a 3 inch front spacer and stock rear. Tires are 33x12.50r17s. I ran 35s on stock wheels for a while but went back to 33s on aftermarket wheels. 35s we’re fine on road but rubbed badly offroad. Happy with how it currently sits.

15d0017ee7fcbd5da8f2eb2ce5dabbfc.jpg

 

 

 

Thanks man, your truck looks great.  I put a 2in front lift on mine.  You think I would be able to run 33in tires with the stock 17in rims with zero rubbing? 

3E450B93-79A1-4771-A0AD-339F669D21A0.jpeg

Posted

Here’s my 18 SLT I picked up. Kept it simple. Did a rc 2” level and 275 60 20 Hankook tire and a little window tint! Traded in a 18 Denali that I had all sorts of vibration issues . Couldn’t be happier!2E70FB14-C065-43A2-A853-501C832C878A.thumb.jpeg.a86400e818294a724dd4aeff1c9fe5df.jpeg

Posted
Thanks man, your truck looks great.  I put a 2in front lift on mine.  You think I would be able to run 33in tires with the stock 17in rims with zero rubbing? 
3E450B93-79A1-4771-A0AD-339F669D21A0.thumb.jpeg.496726336717694f5e6710ae2c196cd9.jpeg



Thank you! You’re going to rub on the UCAs if you get a wide tire like my 12.50s. My -6 offset wheels fixed that issue since they stick out a little.
Posted



Thank you! You’re going to rub on the UCAs if you get a wide tire like my 12.50s. My -6 offset wheels fixed that issue since they stick out a little.


Do you have any rubbing? I've got +0 rims and like the width of the 12.5s compared to my 295/70


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...