Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Joe98 said:

WOW...very clean!  Thought I was on the wrong forum for a second...great looking Camaro.

Thanks  Always have been a Chevy guy, starting at 16. 

Posted

Traded in my '12 Ram Hemi for a '14 LT Z71. Hard to get used to the seats, and the completely quiet cab, but I'm pretty fond of the new truck.

 

Looking to offload the 22 rep CK375's , then add, borla s-type, air raid MIT, fox 2.5's, and do something about the headlights (and ridiculously dim reverse lights). Also researching vinyl wrap for bumper, grill and headlight trim, PTM mirror caps, 2.5 and radio swap, and leather seat/console swap.

IMG_0789.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Steven York said:

Traded in my '12 Ram Hemi for a '14 LT Z71. Hard to get used to the seats, and the completely quiet cab, but I'm pretty fond of the new truck.

 

Looking to offload the 22 rep CK375's , then add, borla s-type, air raid MIT, fox 2.5's, and do something about the headlights (and ridiculously dim reverse lights). Also researching vinyl wrap for bumper, grill and headlight trim, PTM mirror caps, 2.5 and radio swap, and leather seat/console swap.

IMG_0789.jpg

Hopefully this version is less distorted.

IMG_0789 (002).jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Steven York said:

Hopefully this version is less distorted.

IMG_0789 (002).jpg

Good looking truck!!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My sons 2016 LT  We  looking to return to the truck world soon miss my All-Terrain for the last 2 years and will lose access to my sons he is moving out on his own.

IMG_0302.jpg

  • Like 6
Posted (edited)
On 8/25/2019 at 4:55 PM, tarheelkidd said:

Thanks  Always have been a Chevy guy, starting at 16. 

I started early too. Use to drag race the 69 with my Dad. He started when I was 14 and I took over at 16. We sure had some good times. He’s gone but I still have the car. Added the 67 in 2001. 

FDEE8183-2C12-4955-84D3-47FC9544480F.jpeg

Edited by Racindave
  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Racindave said:

I started early too. Use to drag race the 69 with my Dad. He started when I was 14 and I took over at 16. We sure had some good times. He’s gone but I still have the car. Added the 67 in 2001. 

FDEE8183-2C12-4955-84D3-47FC9544480F.jpeg

Wow!  Both are beautiful 1st Gens.   I am partial to the 67, even though the 69 is more desirable  I am sure you have a lot of great memories. 

  • Like 4
Posted
8 hours ago, Steven York said:

Hopefully this version is less distorted.

IMG_0789 (002).jpg

Good looking rig ... I actually think those wheels look good !!

Posted
1 hour ago, Racindave said:

I started early too. Use to drag race the 69 with my Dad. He started when I was 14 and I took over at 16. We sure had some good times. He’s gone but I still have the car. Added the 67 in 2001. 

FDEE8183-2C12-4955-84D3-47FC9544480F.jpeg

My all time favourite car !!  You’re so lucky to have that in your stable.

  • Like 1
Posted
Good looking rig ... I actually think those wheels look good !!


Thanks! Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good look, just doesn’t fit the vision of where I want to go with the truck. I’d keep them if I was going to drop it and boost it. I’m looking for something to scoot around the farm and deer camp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
10 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Good looking truck!!!

i've done most of things to mine your talking about.. pm me if you want any info..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...