Jump to content

18" vs 20" Rims


HydrogenCyanide

Recommended Posts

Posted

Aside from looks are there any advantages to going with one verse the other?

 

Is one better for towing?

Does one provide a better ride?

Does one have better handling?

 

Anything else that should go into this decision aside from cost and looks?

Posted

actually 20in is pretty much the new standard on trucks. And the tires are the same $$$ ....if not lower in some cases..

Posted

well.. for 33 inch and up its about the same price on 18 and 20's.. but 20's seem to cost more.

 

but the load range you wont find E range in 20's as easy if you do alot of towing

Posted

I drove identical trucks with only the rim sizes being different before I bought mine. One was red with 20's and the other was black with the 18's. I really didn't notice much of a difference with the ride, I just went with the black one because.....well it was black haha. The 20's were a 920 dollar option as well so I figured I would save that and put it towards some denali 22' hybrid wheels (best rim ever). Seeing how 20's have become so popular on trucks and cars the price difference really isn't that much different. As long as you stick to a 24 and down rim, tires are pretty cheap. It all just comes down to what you want and need on your truck.

Posted

I can give you a pretty well educated answer since I drove a 2014 SLT on polished 18"s for 5,200 miles and then swapped it on a 2014 All Terrain on 20"s. IMO - the ride is a little cushier w/ the 18"s, but that could also have something to do (or maybe everything to do) w/ the firmer suspension setup on the AT. The 20"s will give you better handling characteristics due to the shorter sidewall (and I do notice the AT handles better - but again, the suspension), but technically you're going to be better setup for off-roading and towing w/ an 18" rim due to the fatter tire, it all comes down to what you expect out of the truck.


That being said, in truth, the 20" seems to be the better overally choice for a 1/2 ton pickup - it simply "looks right" IMO since the wheel wells have gotten so large, and there's still plenty of sidewall in the tire. The 22" rims is where you'll notice ride really suffering and towing ability compromised.

Posted

18" = Smoother ride, better off-roading and cheaper tires to replace.

 

20" = Looks better in da hood.

False, false and 20s look better in every hood.

Posted

I don't know where you're getting weight increase of 20's as compared to 18's... There's going to be material there no matter the rim size, and the weight difference is too small for it to change anything. Do the math and look at the energy required to spin them up to 60 mph. Then do the math and look at the energy required to accelerate a 6000 lb vehicle to 60. What's required to get the wheels themselves turning is so small it's negligible. That being said, my truck had factory 20's on it and they were swapped to 17's before it came home.

Posted

I don't know where you're getting weight increase of 20's as compared to 18's... There's going to be material there no matter the rim size, and the weight difference is too small for it to change anything. Do the math and look at the energy required to spin them up to 60 mph. Then do the math and look at the energy required to accelerate a 6000 lb vehicle to 60. What's required to get the wheels themselves turning is so small it's negligible. That being said, my truck had factory 20's on it and they were swapped to 17's before it came home.

I agree. 17,18,20, doesn't really matter, the amount of meat wrapped around it is going to play a bigger role in loss of mpg and acceleration IMO.

Posted

I can give you a pretty well educated answer since I drove a 2014 SLT on polished 18"s for 5,200 miles and then swapped it on a 2014 All Terrain on 20"s. IMO - the ride is a little cushier w/ the 18"s, but that could also have something to do (or maybe everything to do) w/ the firmer suspension setup on the AT. The 20"s will give you better handling characteristics due to the shorter sidewall (and I do notice the AT handles better - but again, the suspension), but technically you're going to be better setup for off-roading and towing w/ an 18" rim due to the fatter tire, it all comes down to what you expect out of the truck.

 

That being said, in truth, the 20" seems to be the better overally choice for a 1/2 ton pickup - it simply "looks right" IMO since the wheel wells have gotten so large, and there's still plenty of sidewall in the tire. The 22" rims is where you'll notice ride really suffering and towing ability compromised.

 

I have the factory 22's and I have ahd multiple people who have ridden in it comment on how it's one of the best riding trucks they've ever rode in. The tires that come on them are truck tires. Granted they aren't made for heavy towing but if I wanted to tow 12,000 pounds I would have gotten a 3/4 ton...

Posted

drove a

 

I don't know where you're getting weight increase of 20's as compared to 18's... There's going to be material there no matter the rim size, and the weight difference is too small for it to change anything. Do the math and look at the energy required to spin them up to 60 mph. Then do the math and look at the energy required to accelerate a 6000 lb vehicle to 60. What's required to get the wheels themselves turning is so small it's negligible. That being said, my truck had factory 20's on it and they were swapped to 17's before it came home.

 

 

very true

 

 

 

drove a bunch of 2500's that had 18's before i purchased mine which has 20's and noticed no difference in ride

Posted

I think 20's look great with a 35" or larger tire. Anything smaller than a 35".....I'd go 18's. I just prefer the look of more sidewall.

Posted

The ride difference is negligible and I doubt anyone's ass is sensitive enough to tell the difference. If larger wheels caused such a decrease in ride quality then why would a luxury vehicle, like an escalade, come with 22s? As far as the capability argument I call BS. Like parks mentioned, it's all relative anyway when talking about sidewall...I got plenty of it despite my "ghetto" wheels. A truck with 20s and 33s can do the exact same things as a truck with 17s and 33s. The only downside to larger wheels in an Offroad situation would probably be rock crawling. Small wheels and white letters out should stay in the 90s.

Posted

Aside from looks are there any advantages to going with one verse the other?

Is one better for towing?

Does one provide a better ride?

Does one have better handling?

Anything else that should go into this decision aside from cost and looks?

Do you have a 1500 or 2500? Looking for a P or LT tire? Based on the tire you "need"- P or LT rated, I would then look at tires in each rim size to see what is available to decide what rim size to go with! What type of towing, light or heavy? Not sure if there would be a noticeable difference in towing if comparing the same tire in a 18" or 20" rim size.

 

Now, for our 1500 we had, I did find a fair amount of LT tire choices in at least a load range C for the factory 18" rims, but never looked for 20" replacements. These were tire sizes that would fit a stock Z71 4x4, no level/lift kit.

 

The one advantage I have noticed in looking for replacement tires for our new '13 2500HD, the larger the rim size, the less the available tire choices. Just trying to locate an A/T tire for the beast, but the factory 20" (bought off lot-should have traded down) rims are making it very difficult in the 2 tires I like, the Cooper A/T3's and BFG A/T's, let alone something similar! For this reason I am seriously considering stepping down to an aftermarket 17" rim.

 

Bringtherain, your factory tires, are they a P or LT tire? I haven't found to many times when a factory tire is an LT on a 1500, though being a '14 it could be an all new learning experience since it is an all new model! Lol

 

Chris

Posted

The ride difference is negligible and I doubt anyone's ass is sensitive enough to tell the difference. If larger wheels caused such a decrease in ride quality then why would a luxury vehicle, like an escalade, come with 22s? As far as the capability argument I call BS. Like parks mentioned, it's all relative anyway when talking about sidewall...I got plenty of it despite my "ghetto" wheels. A truck with 20s and 33s can do the exact same things as a truck with 17s and 33s. The only downside to larger wheels in an Offroad situation would probably be rock crawling. Small wheels and white letters out should stay in the 90s.

Most people with 20's don't have 35's though... Like the member that has factory 20's that are scratched up now from going through mud. But you're right, 20's are fine for most peoples' uses.

 

Find me what I need to set up my truck with 35's and 20's for less than it costs for me to buy 4 sets of tires (that's 16 E rated tires) for my 17's and I'll be impressed. :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 894 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...