Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, qwank said:

oh ok, I didn't know they had two separate kits. So he just need to get the adjustable kit then.

Yes. But most people think the shackle is cheaper and easier.   Although it might be. It rides like shit becsuse I had that shackle    it should be banned 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Nasty said:

The adjustable kit does. My kit didnt becsuse I went with the 4/7 kit 

I want to go the full 4/7 as I don't want to cut the factory hanger off but I'm worried the stock 275/55R20 will rub too much. 

Edited by Dinner
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Dinner said:

I want to go the full 4/7 as I don't want to cut the factory hanger off but I'm worried the stock 275/55R20 will rub too much. 

You dont cut the hanger at 7" in the rear. I'm at 4/7 with stock hangers 

 

And yes that tire will rub everywhere 

Edited by Nasty
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Nasty said:

You dont cut the hanger at 7" in the rear. I'm at 4/7 with stock hangers 

 

And yes that tire will rub everywhere 

Yeah I know, I was just hoping to avoid buying new tires if I'm going 4/7. 

 

The thought was to go 3" in the front with 2" spindles and setting the Belltech strut to -1" then doing a 7" flip kit and adding a 1" lift shackle to clear these massive 32" tires.

 

If I go the full 4/7 is still drive able with the 275/55R20? What's the preferred tire size? I've seen 305/45R22 to 255/50R20 on a 4/7 drop?! 

Edited by Dinner
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dinner said:

Yeah I know, I was just hoping to avoid buying new tires if I'm going 4/7. 

 

The thought was to go 3" in the front with 2" spindles and setting the Belltech strut to -1" then doing a 7" flip kit and adding a 1" lift shackle to clear these massive 32" tires.

 

If I go the full 4/7 is still drive able with the 275/55R20? What's the preferred tire size? I've seen 305/45R22 to 255/50R20 on a 4/7 drop?! 

It will be drivable yes.  I had 265 50 20 on mine when I had 20s perfect size I think. But are you crew cab or regular cab as crew cabs sit a little lower

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nasty said:

It will be drivable yes.  I had 265 50 20 on mine when I had 20s perfect size I think. But are you crew cab or regular cab as crew cabs sit a little lower

RCSB 5.3 2WD

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dinner said:

RCSB 5.3 2WD

I had 275 55 20 on my truck when it was 3/6.  With that lift shackle. Worst ride ever. I'm now at 4.5/7 ish.    So you can use the stock tires for now but you will want to get smaller ones in the near future 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Dinner said:

RCSB 5.3 2WD

This what me at 4/7 with 265 50 20

20180612_081431.jpg

Posted

I have 285/45R22 which is pretty much the same size as your stock 20s and barely ever rub on 4/6. and thats on 10'' wide wheels. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, qwank said:

I have 285/45R22 which is pretty much the same size as your stock 20s and barely ever rub on 4/6. and thats on 10'' wide wheels. 

Look at your front fender liner and the top of the rear fender wells. I have no paint in a few spots.  I thought I didnt rub either. But those felt fender liners quiet it down 

Posted
2 hours ago, qwank said:

I have 285/45R22 which is pretty much the same size as your stock 20s and barely ever rub on 4/6. and thats on 10'' wide wheels. 

What’s the rim offset you’re using for 22x10’s. 

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, 204-WPG said:

What’s the rim offset you’re using for 22x10’s. 

Most likely +31

Posted

MRR lists the offset on the wheels Qwank and I are running as +30

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Anyone know if I would have an issue with my Z71 Rancho shocks if I put in 2" drop shackles?  Or know if I will feel any ride difference from the extra compression on them?

Posted
1 hour ago, Dr Awesome said:

Anyone know if I would have an issue with my Z71 Rancho shocks if I put in 2" drop shackles?  Or know if I will feel any ride difference from the extra compression on them?

They will be fine with only 2' drop 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hit mid 90's today. Even at the boarder of Canada and up by Duluth it was in the 90's. Going to be like this all week. Such it's nothing like the south seeing 100's but they do say it's a different kind of heat here with all the lakes/water and humid days.
    • Pill flip on the transmission cooler lines is a 100% must do thing too.
    • It's a '21 and was a CPO with extended protection when purchased, so hopefully it will be covered.   I supposedly have all of it's service record history and nothing noted other than routine fluid changes, tire rotations, and the windshield washer nozzles replaced once. 
    • I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is:  First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees   That is WELL past 130ft.lbs per the TSB that you reference that does not apply to this scenario.     As for your clunk.  I'd say it needs to be diagnosed thoroughly.  Assuming the LCA hardware is tight, you could have a problem with the UCA, sway bar end links, etc.      
    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...