Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My Lo Pro QT just arrived today... hoping to be able to get it installed this weekend. A big part of my decision was the number of recommendations it got in this thread!

I just got mine installed yesterday. Seems built well. I have no info on how well it will seal out moisture yet but it should do a fair job.

0219161236a_zps950nbnxu.jpg

0219161236b_zpsdkrunfcz.jpg

0219161237_zpsli7x3gne.jpg

Posted

So I got the Lo Pro QT installed today, and I think I'm going to be very happy with it. I had an Extang Revolution on my previous truck, which I liked, because it does not use velcro at the sides, and held down tightly. However, it was a difficult to lock down (yes I adjusted the tension several times), and it required two latches to be released before you could roll it back. Doesn't seem like much, but it became a pain. I also had some leakage issues with it.

 

This one seems to be much better on the sealing issue. The front seal seems very solid to me. Very little light showing through when I crawled under the closed cover, so I feel confident I won't have much if any water leakage there. The rear looks like it seals more securely as well. I'll add an update once I get a chance to test it further.

 

Here it is installed:

 

Tonneau- Installed

 

Posted

http://shop.agricover.com/product/vanish?_ga=1.70107031.683625629.1455915352

I'm looking at this bed cover for my truck for the added mpg gain as well as keeping stuff dry in florida rain. How is the cover or one similar at highway speed? Does it flap or make any unwanted noises? If I braced it through the middle with a shower rod or storage rod would that help?

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

http://shop.agricover.com/product/vanish?_ga=1.70107031.683625629.1455915352

I'm looking at this bed cover for my truck for the added mpg gain as well as keeping stuff dry in florida rain. How is the cover or one similar at highway speed? Does it flap or make any unwanted noises? If I braced it through the middle with a shower rod or storage rod would that help?

 

sent from Florida beech

I'm pretty sure unless it's fully supported underneath it will flap under wind load.

Posted

I'm pretty sure unless it's fully supported underneath it will flap under wind load.

Is the teuXedo better quality and not flap? What do most people do to stop flapping?

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

So I got the Lo Pro QT installed today, and I think I'm going to be very happy with it. I had an Extang Revolution on my previous truck, which I liked, because it does not use velcro at the sides, and held down tightly. However, it was a difficult to lock down (yes I adjusted the tension several times), and it required two latches to be released before you could roll it back. Doesn't seem like much, but it became a pain. I also had some leakage issues with it.

 

This one seems to be much better on the sealing issue. The front seal seems very solid to me. Very little light showing through when I crawled under the closed cover, so I feel confident I won't have much if any water leakage there. The rear looks like it seals more securely as well. I'll add an update once I get a chance to test it further.

 

Here it is installed:

 

 

 

Nice looks good, can't wait for mine now.

So I got the Lo Pro QT installed today, and I think I'm going to be very happy with it. I had an Extang Revolution on my previous truck, which I liked, because it does not use velcro at the sides, and held down tightly. However, it was a difficult to lock down (yes I adjusted the tension several times), and it required two latches to be released before you could roll it back. Doesn't seem like much, but it became a pain. I also had some leakage issues with it.

 

This one seems to be much better on the sealing issue. The front seal seems very solid to me. Very little light showing through when I crawled under the closed cover, so I feel confident I won't have much if any water leakage there. The rear looks like it seals more securely as well. I'll add an update once I get a chance to test it further.

 

Here it is installed:

 

 

 

Nice looks good, can't wait for mine now.

Posted

I'm pretty sure unless it's fully supported underneath it will flap under wind load.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CGGXR9C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1455916806&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=572001+truxedo+low+pro+qt

Something along these lines. I don't know if the low ones make the difficult to support. Any tips I would appreciate

 

sent from Florida beech

Posted

To anyone with a Roll N Lock cover.....I'm just wondering does this cover move at all (or flap) on the interstate ?

I'm worried with a regular cab if it did I'd be able to hear it in the truck.

Probably going with the Roll N Lock A series metal cover.....I want one that will retract and one that will not cover the Chevrolet on the top of the bedside....doesn't look like I have many options.

Thanks for the help and any ideas !

Posted (edited)

You should practice what you preach.

 

All I know is everyone that has seen my DB cover could not believe how heavy duty it is. "Look at those heavy duty hinges", "that cover will last for ever". When I tell people it can hold 1600lbs on top they say "I believe just by looking at it".

 

 

Edited by txab
Posted

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00CGGXR9C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1455916806&sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=572001+truxedo+low+pro+qt

Something along these lines. I don't know if the low ones make the difficult to support. Any tips I would appreciate

 

sent from Florida beech

I'd recommend going back through this thread and asking members who have similar covers or the same cover. I've only had 1 vinyl cover and it flapped. That (and security) deterred me from buying another.

Posted (edited)

All I know is everyone that has seen my DB cover could not believe how heavy duty it is. "Look at those heavy duty hinges", "that cover will last for ever". When I tell people it can hold 1600lbs on top they say "I believe just by looking at it".

 

 

 

The SE model holds 400 lbs. The HD holds 1,600 lbs. According to DB's website, the HD (.100" thickness) would be 25% thicker than the SE (.080" thickness) which is rather significant. I'm not up to date on the current prices of a SE or HD covers, so what do they cost?

 

 

 

I like the RollNLock A-Series. It's the only cover that I've found with four locking points. The TruckCoversUSA looks pretty nice, it's rated at 500 lbs distributed weight, but I personally have never loaded anything on top of a tonneau cover.

 

EDIT for further explanation: The RollNLock's single lock has four locking points. The DB has two locks that have two locking points each.

Edited by TruckDaddy
Posted (edited)

The SE model holds 400 lbs. The HD holds 1,600 lbs. According to DB's website, the HD (.100" thickness) would be 25% thicker than the SE (.080" thickness) which is rather significant. I'm not up to date on the current prices of a SE or HD covers, so what do they cost?

 

 

 

I like the RollNLock A-Series. It's the only cover that I've found with four locking points. The TruckCoversUSA looks pretty nice, it's rated at 500 lbs distributed weight, but I personally have never loaded anything on top of a tonneau cover.

 

Both of those covers cost more than the SE (SE carries 400lbs cost $1199, HD carries 1600lbs cost $1599). A quick search shows me that roll n lock a series cost around $1500-1600 and tcusa around $1600-1700. so they would both be better suited being compared to the DB HD (1600lbs) due to pricing. The roll n lock according to their website will be damaged with only 120lbs on top of it. I believe DB covers could be considered having 4 locking points. Since there is a lock rod in each corner of the bed that pivots under the bed rails. As well as 4 clamps on the center panel.

 

 

 

Edited by txab
Posted

Hey how much of the bed is not usable with the GM cover?? Had the bakflip on my Dodge and loved the use of the whole bed?

  • Like 1
Posted

Anybody running the Truxedo Titanium? I've got the Tonnopro Hardfold now, it's a great cover in most aspects but, the latch system is cumbersome and I've had to remove it a few times in the last few months to haul larger loads so, I'm looking at hard roll ups, BAK's customer service and reputation are enough to steer me away from their products. Honestly I could probably get by with a lo-pro but, I like the hard cover aspect.

 

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...