Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Basically all the crap about corrosion protection the GM is applying is a total bite in the ass for them. I wonder if they have any feeling of complete failure. I mean if you you post it publicly you better prove it, well its a little late for that. So pathetic, isn't it. Appanently they don't know what extensive means! Oh and they state "enhances the trucks appearance" LOL so hard that is hurts. These trucks already look 8 plus years old underneath. What a joke.

  • Like 1
Posted

Does anyone actually believe this?

 

I'm sure some do, I was being sarcastic when I quoted GM's statement. I guess manufactures can claim anything nowadays without worrying about repercussions. I guess the frame rust and undercoat flaking off enhanced the trucks appearance. lol

  • Like 1
Posted

Basically all the crap about corrosion protection the GM is applying is a total bite in the ass for them. I wonder if they have any feeling of complete failure. I mean if you you post it publicly you better prove it, well its a little late for that. So pathetic, isn't it. Appanently they don't know what extensive means! Oh and they state "enhances the trucks appearance" LOL so hard that is hurts. These trucks already look 8 plus years old underneath. What a joke.

 

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Posted (edited)

 

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Is GM technically correct in advertising their trucks as being "like a rock"?

Edited by pm26
Posted (edited)

Is GM technically correct in advertising their trucks as being "like a rock"?

 

They haven't used that slogan since like '99 haha! I guess you could argue they've quietly backed away from their "like a rock" claim over the years.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

As an original owner, I bought a '87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe Demonstrator model and the undercarriage was sprayed with a Line-X type coating. After 28 years, the coating is still there.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Silverados corrosion protection measures provide superior defense against elements in the environment, whether driving through farm fields, on construction gravel, or down a snow-covered highway, said Mark Yergin, engineering group manager, General Motors Corrosion Engineering and Labs. The new Silverado is our strongest truck yet, affording us the confidence that the truck will continue to meet customers needs throughout its life.

Additional 2014 improvements over previous models include:

All new body structures designed to minimize the potential for corrosion

Improved hem flange sealing on the doors and hood, and additional underbody flange sealing help keep the joints of the truck dry, discouraging deterioration that might occur from moisture

***Extensive and improved chassis corrosion protection that enhances the trucks appearance and lengthens the life of underbody components

Anti-chip protection on the lower body side for extra protection from stones or gravel.http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2013/Sep/0905-silverado.html

Edit: the strange thing is, I haven't been able to find this same info about the 2014 Sierra. On GM's media site I could only find it on the Silverado.http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2013/Sep/0905-silverado.html

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Haven't we been thru this before, they specifically state "chassis" and guess what, the chassis consists of the frame.

"An example of a chassis is the underpart of a motor vehicle, consisting of the frame (on which the body is mounted)."

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted

Haven't we been thru this before, they specifically state "chassis" and guess what, the chassis consists of the frame.

"An example of a chassis is the underpart of a motor vehicle, consisting of the frame (on which the body is mounted)."

 

Have we? Haha sorry I don't remember reading that but I guess it does state it. I thought there was promotional video that showed them spraying the rock-guard and stuff and the frame was never addressed from what I remember. Anyway I don't know how it can be improved it's a worse wax coating than what they used to use.

Posted

Does anyone think this issue from the factory may have stopped after certain build dates?

Build dates 03/14 and up have an additional clear wax sprayed over the black stuff. Its a lot harder and I have 0 issues with rust on mine.
Posted

Build dates 03/14 and up have an additional clear wax sprayed over the black stuff. Its a lot harder and I have 0 issues with rust on mine.

Probably what was suppose to be done at the start of the 2014's but GM figured they would save a few bucks on the early builds.

Posted

My frame is horrible looking, The entire thing is orange colored with surface rust. I have not see any other new vehicle look this bad. Not even my 2005 tacoma that had to have the frame replaced due to rust. I plan on pressure washing it good this summer and getting under there and doing a good job at painting some sort of frame paint on it. I am not a fan of the thick gunky undercoating.

Posted

My truck was an August 2014 Build and I have found that the frame is rusting where there were welds or joints. The flat surface of the frame itself seems to be holding up alright. I know it's just cosmetic and the frames not going to rust through and break but it sure is annoying.

Posted

These frames are made of relatively thin walled C channels with some fully boxed in sections where the stresses are the greatest. Even though the frame is not likely to rust through for a number of years, it should be properly protected from corrosion, including the welds. It is not exactly made of two inch thick plate steel.

Posted (edited)

These frames are made of relatively thin walled C channels with some fully boxed in sections where the stresses are the greatest. Even though the frame is not likely to rust through for a number of years, it should be properly protected from corrosion, including the welds. It is not exactly made of two inch thick plate steel.

It's a fully boxed frame, not c channels. That's one of the reasons they dip it in wax to properly coat the interior surfaces of the boxed frame.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Silverado-Hareek

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm tangentially aware of what Harley used to be, back in my riding days, although I was into Italian sport bikes. Ducati seems to have gone the other way; still very expensive, but they've made a large subset of their bikes a lot more reliable and accessible, and they've diversified their lineup to include other riding sports too. IMO, a good example of where greed and growth might have also been beneficial to the consumer.   Although GM is charging a relative premium for its most popular pickups, I find that there are some excellent value propositions in its lineup as well.   The Colorado still strikes me as the most attractive midsize on the market, and also the most reasonably priced given capability and features. There's a part of me that wishes I would have bought one instead of my Silverado.   The Equinox ...I must be getting old. The ICE equinox is a great design IMO. Probably because it reminds me visually of an actual SUV aka an S Blazer. Underneath it's nothing even remotely close, but it LOOKS good. It's got all the modern features plus some at a very reasonable price. If I had to run out and buy myself a daily commuter to do everything except tow, an Equinox would be on my list.   It does bug me that mid-tier 1500's reach into the 50-60k range, and Tahoes and Burbs are even more expensive. Less than 10 years ago, dealers were sitting on rows of Tahoe LS and LT's for low 40's. You could even still find Tahoes with a front bench, still!
    • Big oil is raking in billions from the Iran war. Can it avoid Trump’s fury?   Remember I said Big Oil is 'Vertically Integrated"?   Even as they no longer own the majority of the "Pump" they still own the "Well". Crude price upward pressure does not translate into that same pressure on production. Pumping cost remain unaffected and the gap is pure profit. Even after subtraction of a minor, comparatively, lower amount from supposed, but not always, realized refining volume. Consumers hate war, Big Oil, not so much.
    • We live in a world where the average person expects more. People say wages and our needs are farther apart. My first new home had 3 bedrooms and one bedroom. My first car and truck had what would be considered a stripped or work vehicle. In my neighborhood back then there were more homes like that and cars too. Middle managers and second home buyers worked their way up to the fancy houses and cars. Car loans were 3 years. GM had different models of cars for different income levels. The cars were pretty much the same size if you wanted a big vehicle. The nameplate designated the opulence. Chevy, Pontiac, Buick, Oldsmobile and Cadillac.  To be fair some of the cost is government mandated. We can’t blame them for giving us what people will pay for. Careful advertising steering people towards more profitable SUVs and trucks. As I learned recently a minivan is a cheaper more efficient form of transportation. Certainly easier to live with. Somebody realized the profit margin wasn’t as big and gave it a soccer mom label. So it lost its coolness. They’re making it the masses are buying it. You hit your hand with a hammer you can’t blame the hammer.
    • Hi All, I’m In need of advice regarding a scan result on my 2023 Silverado HD.  The Sensor Supply voltage relay states ON But…. the following 3 tests show Malfunction. Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit HIGH voltage Test status- Malfunction Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit LOW voltage Test status- Malfunction Sensor supply voltage relay control circuit OPEN test status - Malfunction. No DTC codes are stored. No DIC Lights. Remote Key Fob has been giving a few issues, namely Vehicle will not respond to an Open/Lock command from the key fob. New batteries installed to FOB made no difference, plus on one occasion recently the vehicle unlocked using the Fob, the vehicle started normally via the push button, then a random warning came up on the DIC stating the Remote Key was not found, all this while the key was located next to the central cup holders. Does anyone have any input or advice regarding this scenario? TIA 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...