Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just installed some Method Racing Double Standards on some 315/70/17 Bfg KO2s. Trucks got a 2” level so yes it rubs and needs to be trimmed but I’m in love with the look.

 

cedc286e85ad4d203ce7ba74db69d1f5.jpg170d74cbd1f4b1bc5879a1e9f6f798ec.jpg184df3f3c392e9c2ccba910bcee31f24.jpg6f3a8e8e92bf2b6c111ea3ea831664bf.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just installed some Method Racing Double Standards on some 315/70/17 Bfg KO2s. Trucks got a 2” level so yes it rubs and needs to be trimmed but I’m in love with the look.
 
cedc286e85ad4d203ce7ba74db69d1f5.jpg170d74cbd1f4b1bc5879a1e9f6f798ec.jpg184df3f3c392e9c2ccba910bcee31f24.jpg6f3a8e8e92bf2b6c111ea3ea831664bf.jpg
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Mind posting a couple pics when you trim? Curious what's needed to run this tire size


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


Mind posting a couple pics when you trim? Curious what's needed to run this tire size


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Not at all. Haven’t had a chance to cut all I need to cut but I will post pics when I’m done. It’s drivable right now but definitely needs some more clearance. I think I may raise the front another 0.5”. That should help


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Just for reference.

 

315/70/17 Bfg v 275/70/18 Falken Wildpeak

80c807b7526d2159f9a4bec4aa63278e.jpg

 

I didn’t rub at all with the Falkens on stock wheels. The new Methods are a 0 offset which definitely doesn’t help with the rubbing. The Bfg is right at 34.5” on this 8.5 wide rim. The Falkens are just over 33”

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, langston1726 said:

 

 


Not at all. Haven’t had a chance to cut all I need to cut but I will post pics when I’m done. It’s drivable right now but definitely needs some more clearance. I think I may raise the front another 0.5”. That should help


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

She's looking beefy that's for sure.

Posted
Just for reference.
 
315/70/17 Bfg v 275/70/18 Falken Wildpeak
80c807b7526d2159f9a4bec4aa63278e.jpg
 
I didn’t rub at all with the Falkens on stock wheels. The new Methods are a 0 offset which definitely doesn’t help with the rubbing. The Bfg is right at 34.5” on this 8.5 wide rim. The Falkens are just over 33”
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
 
 
 


I know bfgs run small, but it seems like falkens run big as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


I know bfgs run small, but it seems like falkens run big as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Agreed. However a 315/70/17 comes out to around 34.4 when you do the calculation. Mine are measuring 34.5. Most guys just call these 35s though. The Falkens are pretty beefy. We have some 285/70/17 Falkens on my wife’s Tahoe and there right at a 33.
Posted

 

 

Agreed. However a 315/70/17 comes out to around 34.4 when you do the calculation. Mine are measuring 34.5. Most guys just call these 35s though. The Falkens are pretty beefy. We have some 285/70/17 Falkens on my wife’s Tahoe and there right at a 33.

 

Damn that's big, my nitto g2's in 295/70/17 are a little under 33 mounted on the rear. Guess I won't be afraid to go with the falkens next time around for fear of them being too small.

 

Speaking of, pics of said Tahoe?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
 

Damn that's big, my nitto g2's in 295/70/17 are a little under 33 mounted on the rear. Guess I won't be afraid to go with the falkens next time around for fear of them being too small.

 

Speaking of, pics of said Tahoe?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Sorry they’re actually a little closer to 32.7

5c04a9070d19a0fb3bb99d7a8106e4a1.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

2014 Silverado 4x4 LT Crew Cab Std Bed; RC Lift: 2.5" Front 2" Rear; Tires: Mickey Thompson Baja ATZ 305/60R18;  Wheels: Stock 18x8.5, Factory Offset

Undetectable rub while driving in any configuration (towing, reverse...) , but minor paint rubbed off of sway bar.

WP_20170719_19_13_34_Pro1.jpg

WP_20170719_20_07_25_Pro.jpg

WP_20170719_16_51_57_Pro.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

2015 sierra 4x4 z71 motofab 3" front stock rear. 22x12 -44 ballistic rage and 33x12.5x22 nitto trail grappler20190110_174119.thumb.jpg.aa3c19e85b479e69f8fa022da85580db.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

67EF0CCB-36DF-4A0C-BBF9-EACF68510EE7.thumb.jpeg.7aff4e8255763eb4314479f6e2cb7f7b.jpeg

just sold my 2015 2500 gas burner. Man I loved the way this truck looked just wasn’t real practical as a DD. Cooper ST maxx 11.50 x 34.  Bought a 2018 z71 in September. Just ordered a 2 inch level kit and either 285/60/20 or 305/55/20 Toyo open country RT. Will post pics next week I hop. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 463 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...