Jump to content

Rancho quicklift loaded


fuse36

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've only had them on for a about 2000-3000km so about 2000miles. Pretty sure the ball joints were bad when I bought the truck.

Did the new upper control arms not come with new ball joints?

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Did the new upper control arms not come with new ball joints?

yes they came with upper ball joints. It's my lower ball joints that are bad.
Posted

So after using these for three months, I can give a bit of an update on them. This is trying all setting variations. I find that setting the damping lower just made it bouncier as the spring has such a high rate. While I don't mind these shocks, I feel they give about the same ride quality as 5100's did for me in the past on my last truck. I get a preloaded spring feeling.

 

 

 

Pros

1. Ride is more controlled than stock

2. Reduces body roll/ nose dive

3. Gave slightly more than 2" of lift, for a new truck it would make it sit pretty much perfectly level

4. Adjustable damping great for towing

 

Cons

1. Still harsh riding over cracks and expansion joints

2. Very harsh riding over bigger bumps/man holes/speed bumps etc.

3. When the shock extends after going over bumps etc it does so very fast and harsh (most likely due to high spring rate)

 

 

These cons are leading me to probably replace the front shocks with Bilstein 6112's, all the people on various forums that have been running them have nothing but great things to say about how they ride and how soft and plush the ride is. I will most likely keep the rear 9000xl's for the sake of being able to adjust them for towing. Don't get me wrong I don't hate the rancho's they're good shocks, I just feel they could be better, but I guess you get what you pay for. They are better than stock, and they are an upgrade over stock. I'm very critical and I over think things like this while others just say "They ride great" and go on with their life.

 

I've spent some time comparing the quicklift loaded physically to my stock struts and I've noticed they mimic a lift kit that has a coil spacer and a bottom spacer. These kits provide lift by compressing the coil in combination with using a bottom or top spacer. The quicklifts coil is compressed more than my stock strut (mimics coil spacer) as well as it is slightly longer (mimics bottom/top spacer). I think this is its major down fall.

 

The 6112's use higher damping and a lower rate coil, this gives the ultimate ride by reducing the coil bounce that I hate and increasing the work done by the shock.

 

Why don't you get rid of the 20's and put 18's on the truck or switch to a taller sidewalled tire to help your ride. I have these shocks and they ride way better than stock and also I have them set at 6 in front and 5 in back and the ride is amazing so smooth and handle bumps really well. Your problem is you only have a 55 series tire on there. Go with a more side wall. People need to understand the bigger the wheel ie: 20" 22" and up are going to ride real rough and you will feel any imperfections in the road. Anybody looking at these shocks......buy them. Oh and also my truck has never hit the bump stops at all in the front and have pretty much the same suspension travel as stock. If your stock A arms are resting on the bump stops something is wrong. My suspension has never felt over extended at all.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Here in the US we blame the ride quality on the government for bad roads, not the shocks. :D

Posted

Mine ride better now with the ball joints replaced. Doesnt jar up as much on small cracks in the road. Still too stiff and bouncy imo though.

Posted

22's do not belong on a truck sorry. You could run Kings or Fox struts and you're still going to have a shit ride. Bilsteins won't fix your problem either. The 5100's by their very nature are going to ride rougher yet.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Quicklifts + Cognito UCA's + 3" rear blocks. Also installed 9000xl's in the rear. For anyone wanting the matching Rancho rear shocks but have larger rear blocks, the RS999269 parts are the perfect dimensions for 2" of lift. The rear shocks Rancho pairs with the quicklift struts are for stock rear height or 4" of lift.

 

post-129450-0-26692000-1435949113_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-77437000-1435949137_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-26692000-1435949113_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-77437000-1435949137_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-26692000-1435949113_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-77437000-1435949137_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-26692000-1435949113_thumb.jpg

post-129450-0-77437000-1435949137_thumb.jpg

Posted

 

Got my new wheel set up. Went from 20" to 18". The new bf Goodrich ko2 tires. 285 65 18. Love the ride. Much better ride then my 20" wheels

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

using Tapatalk

Posted

Got my Quicklifts and RS9000XLs on today, took the front end up and the ride is great! There is still some rake but I think it looks fine.

 

1_zps4bokqy3h.jpg

 

2_zpsz9mvwwzs.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I got my ranchos installed on friday. What a difference in the ride. I have the front on 6 and the rear on 5 but I think I am going to try 4 in front and 5 in back. It is kind of a pain to adjust the front because I can not see what setting they are on.

 

I had these in the rear of my last truck and I loved them.

 

Does rancho making a steering stabilizer for these?

Posted

Got my Quicklifts and RS9000XLs on today, took the front end up and the ride is great! There is still some rake but I think it looks fine.

 

1_zps4bokqy3h.jpg

 

2_zpsz9mvwwzs.jpg

Looks like about the same amount of rake I have. If you measure from the ground to cab at the front and back your cab is probably level.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

It's counter clockwise on mine, I just checked.

 

Yes going counter clockwise all the way will line up the 1 setting pointing up.

 

 

number pointing straight up is the setting


Sent from my iPhone
using Tapatalk

 

I installed mine, and even straight out of the box, I couldn't read the numbers. On my red circle "dials", there are four points- i.e. basically 3, 6, 9 and 12 o'clock. One of those dials is longer than the other three. Can someone with a set of these finish this sentence for me?

 

When the longest point on the dial is turned straight up, the setting is ________.

Posted

 

 

 

 

I installed mine, and even straight out of the box, I couldn't read the numbers. On my red circle "dials", there are four points- i.e. basically 3, 6, 9 and 12 o'clock. One of those dials is longer than the other three. Can someone with a set of these finish this sentence for me?

 

When the longest point on the dial is turned straight up, the setting is ________.

5

 

Best settings for me have been 5 in the front and 4 in the rear.

 

Turn them completely counter clock wise and you're at setting 1.

Posted

Got my Quicklifts and RS9000XLs on today, took the front end up and the ride is great! There is still some rake but I think it looks fine.

 

1_zps4bokqy3h.jpg

 

2_zpsz9mvwwzs.jpg

How much you spend all total?

 

Does this setup do anything to increase payload capacity or do I still gotta consider airbags?

 

Why r people wondering about steering stabilizers? Does it feel mushy or?

 

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...