Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was thinking of doing this before the truck gets a lot of road time, but the factory undercoating is pretty fragile; so haven't pulled the trigger yet.....

Posted

I plan on treating my frame with FF in the next couple of weeks. Never had an issue with it, if there's issues with using it someone please post a link.

Posted

Most of the rust issues with frame rust people are screaming about will never effect the life of the truck. Ive had more than my share of old cars and trucks, none of them had treated frames unless I did it for looks. My latest lowered 22 year old truck is bare out side of a little surface rust is just fine. My new truck if I can see it a little rubberized undercoating fixes it. Im not going to look under the truck for a spot of surface rust that will never rust through the frame. The leased amount of time my truck spends at the dealer the better.

  • Like 2
Posted

I know of a few that live up north have used AMSOIL's HD Metal Protector on the underside of their vehicles with good results.

 

AMH_zps26ed3c4d.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

I just FF'd mine a few weeks ago. It does soften the factory undercoating but it's still worth putting the Fluid Film on. Once there's a flake/crack/scrape in the factory uc, it seems to accelerate rusting of the frame if anything. Fluid film is one of the few good options out there. Krown is supposed to be good if you're in Canada. Krown and FF are supposedly pretty similar.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted

I do absolutely nothing to the frame of my trucks. Never had a problem, just one more reason I love living in the south.

  • Like 1
  • 4 years later...
Posted

2016 Silverado + Fluid Film application about a month ago + a few car washes + a few days of salted snowy roads. It definitely softens the factory 2016 undercoating. I am going to apply in those spots again.

IMG_2566.jpg

Posted

The factory wax coating only seems to get a winter or two before it starts falling off anyway. Who cares that an undercoat softens it. It least theres less time that the frame is exposed to the elements that way.

  • Like 1
Posted

if you're that worried about the wax coating, I'd just reapply it. You can buy a can of that stuff. The exact name is listed in several threads. I think its like nox-rust. If you are under bumper to bumber warranty, i'd see if the dealer will repair it for you. I got mine to reapply it right before my 36 month mark.

 

I use fluid film every year on my snow plow, but I only spray it on the steel parts. The directions specifically say to be careful applying to other surfaces and it is known that it can damage rubber.

Posted

I live in MA & my truck gets pummeled w/ road salt/sand etc. all winter. I make a point to re-apply the factory wax coating once yearly smack dab in the middle of SUMMER when its hot & dry so the coating adheres well & also so there's no chance for trapped moisture causing rust beneath the surface later. 

 

Depending on the condition 1 or 2 cans does the trick, this year I went heavy & did a full 2 spray cans of it everywhere underneath & it seems like reapplying helps the wax adhere to parts better & keeps it supple w/ way less flaking occurring in between applications  - I have 58k miles on this truck, previously my '14 had 45k miles on it before I totaled it and DIDNT treat the frame - its fairly obvious the frame/undercarriage on my current truck is holding up MUCH better.

 

My truck is leveled I don't even really need to lift it up to get a good application (although I do drive it up on ramps to really get a good look underneath) - safety glasses, respirator/handkerchief, a creeper & 1-2 $20 bottles of nox-rust all you need.

Posted

When I bought my truck in Apr 2015 I was warned about using FF as it would void my warranty... SMH who cares about my frame warranty when the fix from the dealership is to just spray nox-rust over the existing rust. I have fluid filmed my truck in the summer and late fall every year since and touch up bare spots with Nox-Rust. It does soften the wax. I will not deny this. But the wax was already soft thin and crappy from the factory. The high "spray" areas are prone to wearing the ft away and I will touch these up a few times in the winter. Overall if you look at my frame and park it next to any other 2015 in new hampshire you will see a shiny greasy soft wax coated frame on my truck, and a rusted nasty looking frame on another. I suppose it's a good thing that driver protected there factory warranty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I bought the 5 gallon bucket of fluid film and the kelsport spray gun. I undercoat all my winter vehicles (4) every year and I usually get two years out of a 5 gallon bucket. Stuff smells like dirty scrotum, but my frame has no rust!!! My braklines have not rust. I plan on having my truck for atleast 10 more years. Long after the warranty will dry up. I also pressure wash my vehicles at minimum bi-weekly even in the deep winter. I have had no issue with the water damaging the frame wax with ff.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,706 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...