Jump to content

E85?

philbilly20

By philbilly20
in Engines & Drivetrain

Recommended Posts

kstruckcountry Senior Enthusiast

kstruckcountry

Posted
Posted

There is still more energy placed in creating the end product, than the energy you receive from it. The amount of diesel burnt to prep, plant, harvest a bushel of corn is more than the energy that bushel of corn yields. The only reason it is cheaper than gasoline is that it is subsidized. This is a well known fact and has been documented many times.

 

We should be looking at a different biomass than corn...switch grass, sugar beets, etc.. Isn't Venezuala making all their own fuel from sugar beets at this point? I know the local farms grow a lot of switcn grass for ethanol.

In Brazil they are getting around 8:1 return with sugar cane. You will not see that come here very quickly, the farm lobby wants CORN. And even those liars will only claim a 2:1 return with it.

 

BUT Brazil weaned a whole city off ethanol and back on, and found that the smog levels were actually lower with non-ethanol fuel.

  • Replies 326
  • Created
  • Last Reply
sdeeter19555 Senior Enthusiast

sdeeter19555

Posted
Posted

As for the mileage...isn't it a wash? Use more fuel, but better power or usd less fuel and get poorer power. I would assume making more power would make it easier to move the vehicle, which would net better mileage? Has anyone did hand calculated before/after?

 

I'm basing this off a deal I did a long time ago...dropped a decent 440 into a truck that had a 318...went from 13mpg to 16mpg driving sensibly.

austingta Enthusiast

austingta

Posted
Posted

This is a good conversation.

 

If you take everything into consideration, I'd rather be using e85 than Dino gas from the Middle East.

mjj Enthusiast

mjj

Posted
Posted

As for the mileage...isn't it a wash? Use more fuel, but better power or usd less fuel and get poorer power. I would assume making more power would make it easier to move the vehicle, which would net better mileage? Has anyone did hand calculated before/after?

 

I'm basing this off a deal I did a long time ago...dropped a decent 440 into a truck that had a 318...went from 13mpg to 16mpg driving sensibly.

I've kept track of mine. Got the truck in mid December so its all been winter blend here in MI. Probably 60/40 freeway/city driving with some 4x4 hi and auto 4x4 usage. First 1200 miles was 87 and I averaged 15.2 mpg hand calculated. The last 900 miles has been E85 (probably actually E75) and I've averaged 14.0 mpg hand calculated. That's only 8% less fuel economy with an average of 19-20% less cost at the pump (40 cent/gal cheaper for E85). From what I've noticed with E85 it stays in V4 much longer probably helping out the fuel economy.
WendysOrBust Enthusiast

WendysOrBust

Posted
Posted

As for the mileage...isn't it a wash? Use more fuel, but better power or usd less fuel and get poorer power. I would assume making more power would make it easier to move the vehicle, which would net better mileage? Has anyone did hand calculated before/after?

 

I'm basing this off a deal I did a long time ago...dropped a decent 440 into a truck that had a 318...went from 13mpg to 16mpg driving sensibly.

No, the engine uses considerable more e85 compared to gas per spark. In comparison I can average 17.5 on 91 city/highway. On e85 its like 13.8 doing similar driving. The best e85 milage I've got is 14.5 doing mostly highway.

 

If I was driving as much I was a few years ago, ~600+ miles a week. I could never justify e85 since its harder to find, and the cost per mile is more compared to 91. But I'm barely driving 300 miles a week now and there is a e85 fuel station 5 minutes from my house. Debating contacting Black Bear and having them do a 91 and an e85 tune.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

AS I posted before I lose 3 mpg on the hwy and an average of 2.5 in town on E85. But I would run mid grade or 93 gas when I cant get E85. Im not going to lie I like the way my truck runs on it, so if it cost me a little more no big deal.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Are those hand calculated numbers or the lie-o-meter?

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G730A using Tapatalk

I expect it to be off a few, I was just for the differents between the two fuels.
WendysOrBust Enthusiast

WendysOrBust

Posted
Posted

Are those hand calculated numbers or the lie-o-meter?

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G730A using Tapatalk

I don't know about you guys but I've found the trip meter to be pretty accurate. I've double checked it a few times and its always within .5mpg.

glcbn Enthusiast

glcbn

Posted
Posted

I don't know about you guys but I've found the trip meter to be pretty accurate. I've double checked it a few times and its always within .5mpg.

 

Yep. It's pretty darn accurate.

mjj Enthusiast

mjj

Posted
Posted

Same here. About a half a mpg on the high side.

patriot Enthusiast

patriot

Posted
Posted

I'd run E85 in the truck if I could get it here, and the price gave me equal or better fuel cost per mile.

Of course, the only reason it's this cheap is the .gov subsidy on ethanol fuel.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 488 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      AFM Experience

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • SwitchBladeSierra
      14-18 Sierra 1500 Heated Steering Wheel Help

      By SwitchBladeSierra · Posted

      UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • newdude
      Seems to be Missing a lot of Updates

      By newdude · Posted

      GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Blade8971
      Upgrade to a 2026 AT4 with the 3.0L Duramax

      By Blade8971 · Posted

      Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • Chuck FB
      Correct way to service 2024 l8t allison trans?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...